Case 9-2 Fox v. Mountain West Electric, Inc case
Topic
Contracts outside the code
Decision
District Court found that an implied-in-fact contract existed based on the industry standard's flow- down method of compensation
Issue
Fox and MWE disagreed on compensations methods. There were many changes to the contract.
Summary
Fox and mountain west were contracted to put in fire alarms. MWE did the wiring, while fox did everything else. There was an issue about the contract, and fox left and took them to court. He claims he should've been compensated under UCC. the district and appellant court both sided with MWE, saying the the contract didn't fall under UCC since it was service and goods, not just the sale of goods
Where are we?
Supreme Court of Idaho 2002