Chapter 9: International Law and Justice: An Alternative Approach
Moral pragmatism
A decision maker must ask, first whether any tangible good is likely to result from a course of action and, second, whether the good will outweigh negative collateral consequences
Codify (write down) the law
A primary advantage of treaties is that they do this
1. International treaties 2. International custom 3. General principles of law 4. Judicial decisions and scholarly legal writing (tentatively add a fifth: resolutions and other pronouncements of the UN General Assembly)
According to the Statute of the International Court of Justice, four sources of law:
Moral relativism
Actions must be placed in context
Benefits
Adherence to international law leads to this
* Formal law enforcement organizations (police) * Sanctions (fines, prison)
Advanced legal systems, like those found in stable countries, rely mostly on these things to enforce the law
Atrocities that occurred in Bosnia and in Rwanda during the 1990s
After an absence of nearly 50 years, international tribunals reemerged in the 1990s. This was the driving force
Pacta sunt servanda (treaties are to be served/carried out)
Agreements between states are binding according to this doctrine
Optional clause
Although all UN member-countries are technically parties to the ICJ statute, they must also sign this, agreeing to be subject to the compulsory jurisdiction of the ICJ
Self-help
As a primitive society, the global community continues to focus on this for enforcement
1. Primary reliance on bargaining between adversaries 2. Mediation/conciliation by neutral parties 3. Adjudication (and closely related process of arbitration) by neutral parties
As primitive legal systems develop, the method for settling disputes evolves in this way
Ancient Roman concept of jus gentium (the law of peoples)
Basis of general principles of law
1. States submit legal disputes that arise between them and other states 2. The organs or agencies of the UN asks the ICJ for an advisory opinion
Cases come before the ICJ in these two ways
Process of gaining compliance through threats of violence, imprisonment, economic sanction, or other punishment
Coercion is this
Voluntary compliance
Compliance with international law is mostly based on this
* Religious beliefs * Secular ideologies or philosophies * Standard of equity (what is fair) * Common practice
Concepts of just behavior stem from these things
They recognize the need for a system that is made predictable by adherence to laws and it is in their best interest that other countries follow it
Countries follow international law for this reason
* Constitution (constitutional law) * Legislative body (statutory law) * Statutorily authorized rule making by government agencies and officials (decrees, regulation)
Countries usually make domestic law through these means
Fear that US leaders and military personnel might become targets of politically motivated prosecutions
Crux of US opposition to a strong International Criminal Court
Moral absolutism
Ends never justify the means
* It does not have a formal rule-making (legislative) process ---> Codes of behavior are derived from custom or form explicit agreements among actors * Little or no established authority to judge or punish violations of law
Evidence that the current international legal system falls toward the primitive end of the evolutionary scale of legal systems
Roper v. Simmons ruling against executing juveniles
Example of international custom in domestic legal practices and standards
* Ideological/theological school of law * Naturalist school of law
External law reviews
Hugo Grotius
Father of international law
Low politics such as trade, diplomatic rules, and communications
Functional relations involve these things
* Post-World War II tribunals * Current international tribunals * International Criminal Court
How international law and justice is applied to individuals can be divided into these three topics
Resolve issues between IGOs and may even establish general international law
ICJ advisory opinions help do this
Law is derived from an overarching ideology or theology
Ideological/theological school of law holds this
* Enforcement through self-help * Enforcement by central authorities
In all legal systems, enforcement relies on a combination of these two things
Stare decisis (let the decision stand)
In many domestic systems, legal interpretations by courts set precedent according to this doctrine
* Judicial decisions (interpretation), which set guidelines (precedent) for later decisions by the court
In practice, law is also established through this
Origin of states and their need to regulate their relations
International law has its beginnings in this
* The philosophical roots of law * How laws are made * When and why the law is obeyed (adherence) * How legal disputes are decided (adjudication)
International law is based on these four critical considerations
High politics issues such as national security relations
International law is least effective when applied to this
Rapidly expanding range of transnational functional relations
International law is most effective in governing this
* Proportionality (amount of force used must be proportional to the threat) * Discrimination (force must not make noncombatants intentional targets)
Jus in bello (just conduct of war) includes these standards
Jus ad bellum
Just cause of war
Jus in bello
Just conduct of war
The cause of war The conduct of war
Just war theory has these two parts
* Jurisdictional limits * Lack of enforcement
Limits on the impact of the ICJ and other international courts
* Order * Sovereignty * Theory of property (underpinning of capitalism) * Relies heavily on the process and substance of law rather than on equity
Main points of the western view of law
Costs
Non-compliance to international law leads to this
A clause that commits the signatories to submit disputes arising under the treaty to the ICJ
Nonadherence to the optional clause does not entirely exempt a country from ICJ jurisdiction. It is common for treaties to have this
Voluntary compliance Coercion
Obedience to the law in any legal system is based on a mix of these two thingsC
ICC treaty has not been ratified by 46% of the world states, including such notable countries as the United States, China, Russia, India, and Japan
One issue with the ICC
International treaties
Primary source of international law
Self-help to enforce laws and norms, then gradually develop central enforcement authorities
Primitive societies begin by relying on this for enforcement of the law
* Can the ends justify the means? * Should we judge others by our own standards? * Is it pragmatic to apply standards of legality and justice?
Questions regarding the prudence of applying standards of law, justice, and morality
International custom
Second most important source of international law
Such votes reflect international custom and/or the general principles of law
Some scholars contend that resolutions approved by overwhelming majorities of the General Assembly constitute international law for this reason
2002 after 60 countries became party to it
The ICC treaty became operational at this time
Consists of 15 judges, who are elected to 9 year terms through a complex voting system in the UN. By tradition, each of the 5 permanent members of the UN Security Council has one judge on the ICJ
The ICJ is structured in this way
The UN Secretariat, which is the ICJ executive branch, does not have the authority or power to enforce ICJ rulings
The ICJ only has limited effectiveness for this reason
Gives countries a way, short of war, to settle a dispute once diplomacy has failed
The ICJ plays this valuable role in keeping peace
Weighted voting schemes that favor the rich and powerful, such as those in the UN Security Council, the World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund
The LDCs reject this voting method
Principles designed to protect the long-dominant power of this bloc of states
The Western view of law is based on this
Cite other legal decisions in justifying their own rulings
The doctrine of stare decisis is specifically rejected in Article 59 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice, but in practice judges on both domestic and international courts do this
Humans, by nature, have certain rights and obligations
The naturalist school of law holds this
* Different cultural heritage of non-Western states * Recent independence of those states * History of exploitation their people have often suffered at the hands of the West
The non-Western view of international law is influenced by these things
* Sovereignty * Noninterference
The non-Western view of international law supports these things
Law reflects society and the way people want that society to operate
The positivist school of thought holds this
Wars of aggression, genocide, and numerous "widespread and systematic" crimes committed as part of 'state, organization, or group policy" during international and internal wars
The treaty gives the ICC jurisdiction over these things
Increasing international interaction and interdependence
The twentieth century saw the expansion of both concern for and practice of international law in response to this
Ethical norms
There is a growing body of this that help determine the nature of the international system
The Hague Conferences Geneva Conventions
These set down some rules regarding impermissible weapons, the treatment of prisoners, and other matters
Moral, ethical, equitable, and humanitarian standards and behavior
These things in sum equate to justice
1. Leaders are criminally responsible for war crimes they ordered 2. Leaders are responsible for war crimes committed by their subordinates unless the leaders tried to prevent the crimes or punished perpetrators 3. Obeying orders is not a valid defense for having committed atrocities
These three important precedents were established during the post-WWII tribunals
ECJ and ECHR
These two European regional courts have been by far the most effective of the regional courts
Multiple, reinforcing sources
These, while not a separate source of law, are perhaps the strongest foundation for international law
Primitive but evolving legal system
This concept is important to understanding international law
The United States (given its hegemonic role in the international system)
This country will be critical to the ICC's success
Pragmatic legitimacy
This is the key to international voluntary compliance
National courts remain the first point of justice, and the ICC is authorized to try cases only when countries fail to do so
This is true of cases that come to the ICC
Judicial review
This, which is deciding whether a government law or action is constitutional, is another possible role of international judicial bodies
* Human rights violations * War * Unpunished examples of "lawlessness"
Those who discount international law contend that it exists only in theory, not in practice. They cite these things as evidence
Legal systems Justice
Two things that restrain the power-based pursuit of self-interest in a domestic system
Quasi-legislative
UN members are bound by treaty to abide by some of the decisions of the General Assembly and the Security Council, which makes these bodies this
Subjects obey the law because they accept its legitimacy, that is, people abide by rules because they accept the political authority that made the rules and/or agree with the rules themselves
Voluntary compliance occurs when this happens
1. A last resort 2. Declared by legitimate authority 3. Waged in self-defense or to establish/restore justice 4. Fought to bring about peace
Western tradition has believed that jus ad bellum (just cause of war) exists in cases where the war is these four things
* Ideological/theological school of law * Naturalist school of law * Positivist school of law
Where does law originate? There are these three major schools of thought
International Court of Justice (ICJ)
World Court, which is associated with the UN and evolved from the Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ)