INR 4011 (Cunha): Exam 1
economic protectionists
support protection and oppose fair trade
general protectionists
support protection and support fair trade
with
the H-O model is (with/without) factor mobility
factor type
the H-O model's trade preferences will reflect (factor type/industry of employment)
without
the R-V model is (with/without) factor mobility
industry of employment
the R-V model's trade preferences will reflect (factor type/industry of employment)
absolute advantage
the ability of an individual, a firm, or a country to produce more of a good or service than competitors, using the same amount of resources
comparative advantage
the ability to produce a good at a lower opportunity cost than another producer
globalization
the process by which businesses or other organizations develop international influence or start operating on an international scale
human capital
the skills and knowledge gained by a worker through education and experience
firms and individuals
who trades, countries or firms and individuals?
Mayda and Roderik; Scheve and Slaughter
which author(s) support the factor model over the sector model?
women
(men/women) tend to be more anti trade
politicians, Americans
(politicians/Americans) are against trade while (politicians/Americans) are for it
positive
(positive/negative) correlation between level education and preference for free trade in advanced economies = evidence for factor model
capital-intensive goods
Capital-abundant countries will export _____; according to H-O model
fair trade
Fair prices are paid to producers in developing countries
less
Individuals in losing sectors, are (more/less) likely to be pro free trade
labor-intensive goods
Labor-abundant countries will export _____; according to H-O model
scarce
_____ factors will oppose trade; according to the factor model
abundant
_____ factors will support trade; according to the factor model
Heckscher-Ohlin model
a country that has an abundant supply of a factor of production will have a comparative advantage in goods whose production is intensive in that factor
Ricardo-Viner (specific-factors) model
a model of trade relations that emphasizes the sector in which factors of production are employed rather than the nature of the factor itself. This differentiates it from the Heckscher-Ohlin approach, for which the nature of the factor—labor, land, capital—is the principal consideration.
compatriotism
absolute gains from in-group
low land to labor ratio
abundance of labor and scarcity of land
high land to labor ratio
abundance of land and scarcity of labor
free trading (for)
abundant factors
zero-sum
an exchange in a purely conflictual relationship in which what is gained by one competitor is lost by the other
increases
at high income levels, consumption of services (health, education) (increases/declines) (and saving, too)
pro trade
comparative advantage sectors are...
protectionist
comparative disadvantage sectors are...
middle
consumption gains from trade should be highest for (lower/middle/upper) class
no
do voters vote based off of trade/tariffs?
ethnocentrism
evaluation of other cultures according to preconceptions originating in the standards and customs of one's own culture
industries
factors of production can move across _____ but not across countries; per the H-O model
land, labor, capital
factors of production; the sources of trade
wealthy
human capital will be pro-trade in (wealthy/poor) countries
immobile
in the R-V model, changes in trade fall mainly upon (mobile/immobile) factors
2 noneconomic factors individuals oppose trade
in-group favoritism, fairness concerns
3 economic factors individuals oppose trade
income effects, employment effects, consumption effects
cosmopolitan
looking at the interests of the entire world rather than a single nation
service (non-tradable) economies
modern economies are
services
non-tradable sector
free traders
oppose protection and oppose fair trade
fair traders
oppose protection and support fair trade
consumer
people who work in non-tradables can only experience trade as a...
4 ways Americans views are shaped on trade
perception of US economy's status, thoughts about the possible trading partner, attitudes towards people who are different compared to themselves, the political party in office
nationalism
pride in one's country
declines
proportion of income spent on food (increases/declines) as income rises
increases
proportion of income spent on tradable, durable goods (increases/declines) with income (up to a point)
intergroup competition
relative advantage of in-group (zero-sum)
protectionism (for)
scarce factors
Stopler-Samuelson Theorem
the theorem that protection benefits the scarce factor of production; trade reduces price of labor-intensive goods because imports from labor abundant countries are cheaper, while trade increases the price of capital-intensive goods because it is expensive in labor-abundant countries
manufacturing
tradable sector
Baumol's cost disease
tradable sectors begin growing with trade -> there is a rise in cost/wages in tradable sectors -> the non-tradable sectors need to keep up with the increase in cost/wages in the tradable sectors -> the cost/wages goes up also in non-tradable sectors
opportunity cost
whatever must be given up to obtain some item
nationalism and ethnocentrism
when it comes to determineing whether or not the American public supports trade, which is a better indicator: economic variable or nationalism and ethnocentrism
Ehrlich
which author(s) believes fair trade is sincere to some degree, meaning that people who support fair trade have non-economic sentiments behind their support?
Guisinger
which author(s) believes that knowing the public's preferences toward free trade or protection does not necessarily help us predict which trade policies will be enacted?
Baker
which author(s) believes that middle income Latin Americans benefit the most from trade; consumption of tradable, durable goods increases proportional to income but only to an extent? Ex: the poor do not have enough money to buy these goods while the rich would prefer to put their money towards things besides these goods.
Rogowski
which author(s) believes that owners of abundant factors will favor free trade and owners of scarce factors will oppose free trade?
Mutz and Kim
which author(s) explain views of free trade through the concept of "in-group" favoritism?
Mayda and Roderik
which author(s) looked at GDP per capita and education to interpret the effect of education on trade preferences?
Scheve and Slaughter
which author(s) looked at education and wage for trade preference?
Haiunmeller and Hiscox
which author(s) looked at the impact of education on trade attitudes by labor force statistics?