Intro to logic quiz 1
A general statement makes a claim about an individual member of a class.
False
A prediction could be deductively valid.
False
A statement may be both true and false
False
A suggestion is a statement
False
A tu quoque ("you too") fallacy tries to win approval of its conclusion by exciting the emotions and enthusiasms of a group.
False
A valid argument form is a sign of a defective reasoning process in an argument.
False
A warning is an argument because it makes an inferential claim.
False
All defective arguments commit a fallacy
False
All invalid arguments are substitution instances of the same form.
False
Amphiboly can always be traced to an ambiguity in a specific word or phrase, whereas equivocation can be traced to an ambiguous statement.
False
An arguer may commit the fallacy of false dichotomy by reasoning in a circle.
False
An argument can be both a disjunctive syllogism and a categorical syllogism.
False
An argument that attempts to apply a general rule to a specific case that it was not intended to cover commits a straw man fallacy
False
An uncogent inductive argument must also be weak.
False
Any argument with true premises must be a good argument.
False
Any transference of attributes from parts to whole commits a composition fallacy.
False
Being a mammal is a sufficient condition for being a dog.
False
Counterexamples can be used to show inductive strength or weakness.
False
Each premise indicator may correspond to only a single premise.
False
Every argument that contains a deductive indicator words is a deductive argument.
False
Fallacies of weak induction occur mainly because the premises of an argument are logically irrelevant to the conclusion.
False
Fallacies that try to distract a listener from the rational implications of an argument by making pejorative claims about the argument's author are formal fallacies.
False
Fallacious arguments never have false premises
False
For the purpose of an argument from authority, no one should be considered an authority in more than one field.
False
Hasty generalization proceeds from the general to the specific, whereas the accident fallacy moves from the particular to the general.
False
If an argument commits a fallacy of relevance, then the conclusion of the argument follows from its premises.
False
If an argument commits a fallacy of weak induction, then it is a cogent argument.
False
If an argument is deductively valid, then its premises must be true in actuality.
False
If an inductive argument is weak, then ever statement in the argument is false.
False
If an invalid argument has premises and a conclusion that are all true, then it is impossible to give a counterexample to this argument's form.
False
If an opinion is stated convincingly, then it is a good argument.
False
If every statement in a deductive argument is true, then it must be a valid argument.
False
If reasons are given for a conclusion, then the result will be a good argument.
False
If the premises of an argument make a conclusion likely to be true, then the argument is deductively valid.
False
If you know just the truth values of a deductive argument's premises, then you will know whether the argument is sound.
False
In a deductive argument, the inferential claim is that the conclusion is probably true, given true premises.
False
In a sound argument, the connection between premises and conclusion is merely emotional
False
In all argument forms, the letters represent statements.
False
In an ordinary language argument, the conclusion always appears as the last sentence in the passage.
False
In general, a demonstrated lack of evidence counts as positive evidence.
False
In logic, an argument is adequately defined as a verbal fight.
False
In the form for a hypothetical syllogism, the letters represent noun phrases.
False
Informal fallacies never occur in deductive arguments
False
It is proper to call a statement either valid or invalid
False
No objective criteria exist by which to evaluate an argument.
False
Personal comments are never relevant to the conclusion of a good argument.
False
Some fallacious deductive arguments are sound
False
Some fallacious deductive arguments are valid
False
Some true statements are also false
False
Some uncogent arguments neither contain false premises nor commit a fallacy
False
The accident fallacy is an example of a fallacy of weak induction.
False
The appeal to vanity form of an appeal to the people fallacy entices a person's desire to not be left behind or excluded
False
The conclusion of an inductive argument follows from the premises in a stronger way than does the conclusion of a deductive argument.
False
The fact that a sample is large guarantees that an argument from generalization is cogent.
False
The fallacies of ambiguity arise because the premises are irrelevant to the conclusion.
False
The fallacies of ambiguity include false dichotomy.
False
The fallacies of presumption arise from mistakes in transferring attributes between parts of thing and that thing as a whole (and vice versa)
False
The fallacy of complex question occurs when a disjunctive premise presents two alternatives as though they were jointly exhaustive, when in fact other likely alternatives are available.
False
The false cause fallacy resembles an argument from authority.
False
The first step in testing a deductive argument for validity is to determine whether the premises are all actually true.
False
The objective of an appeal to snobbery fallacy is to arouse a kind of mob mentality.
False
The words, "thus," "since," and "because" are used only in arguments.
False
To be a counterexample, a substitution instance must use terms or statements that begin with the same letters as those in the argument form of which it is an instance.
False
To count as a premise, a statement must be true.
False
Tu quoque arguments are a form of the appeal to the people fallacy.
False
When a fallacy of equivocation is committed, the arguer is usually responding to an ambiguous statement made by someone else.
False
You never need to examine content words when inspecting arguments for informal fallacies
False
An argument based on sign must have an intelligently produced message as justification for its conclusion.
true
Not every passage containing an indicator word is an argument.
True
Not every sentence in a paragraph that contains an argument has to be a part of the argument
True
Some defective arguments do not have false premises
True
Some fallacies arise because the arguer tries to appeal to a listener's dispositions or prejudices, rather than appealing to rational inference.
True
Some fallacies can be detected by inspecting the form of the argument alone
True
Some false cause fallacies arise because the arguer mistakenly tries to reduce a complex of multiple causes down to just one of those causes.
True
The appeal to force fallacy often causes emotion to impede a listener's ability to recognize a missing premise.
True
The counterexample method cannot prove that an argument is valid.
True
The fallacies of ambiguity include amphiboly
True
The fallacies of illicit transference arise from mistakes in transferring attributes between parts of a thing that thing as whole (and vice versa).
True
The fallacies of presumption include false dichotomy.
True
The fallacy of complex question is committed when multiple questions are posed in the guise of a single question, as to invite a single answer to more than one question.
True
The fallacy of equivocation is committed when an argument depends on the fact that a word or phrase takes on two different meanings within an argument.
True
The fallacy of slippery slope occurs when the conclusion of an argument rests on a supposed chain reaction without sufficient reason to believe that chain reaction will actually occur.
True
The modern account of induction allows that an inductive argument can proceed from the general to the particular.
True
The premises of a good argument provide positive evidence for the conclusion.
True
There are multiple distinct types of informal fallacies
True
To have a cogent inductive argument, the premises must not ignore a piece of evidence that would require a different conclusion.
True
When restructuring an argument, you should convert the statements within the argument to complete sentences and place them in the order in which they best capture the argument's reasoning, but otherwise remain as close as possible to the original version.
True
An argument against the person (ad hominem) fallacy attacks another arguer without posing a genuine rebuttal to the opponent's argument.
True
An argument that attempts to apply a general rule to specific case that it was not intended to cover commits an accident fallacy.
True
An argument's form is determined by replacing the content words with letters, while leaving the form words alone.
True
Application of general casual laws to specific circumstances can sometimes be interpreted as deductive.
True
Arguments that commit a fallacy can sometimes be made into valid arguments by rearranging the letters that are used in the argument's form.
True
Arguments using statistical reasoning are inductive.
True
Equivocation can always be traced to an ambiguity in a specific word or phrase, whereas amphiboly can be traced to an ambiguous statement.
True
Every passage that presents both a factual claim and a inferential claim is an argument.
True
If a deductive argument has false premises and a false conclusion, then the argument could be valid.
True
If an argument uses no indicators whatsoever, then the argument could still be either deductive or inductive.
True
If an inductive argument commits a fallacy of weak induction, then it is a weak argument.
True
If two arguments are not substitution instances of the same argument form, then one argument cannot be a counterexample to the other.
True
In a cogent argument, the premises provide evidence for the argument's conclusion.
True
In a good argument, you should be able to infer the conclusion from the premises.
True
In an argument form for a categorical syllogism, the letters will stand for terms or noun phrases.
True
In an explanation, the explanandum is a fact to be explained.
True
In an inductive argument, the inferential claim is that the conclusion is probably true when the premises are true.
True
In committing a straw man argument, the arguer fails to address an opponent's real argument.
True
In fallacies of weak induction, the premises bear some relevance to whether the conclusion might be plausible but not enough to cause a reasonable person to believe the conclusion is actually true.
True
In your textbook, the terms "proposition" and "statement" are used interchangeably.
True
Indicator words are helping in making explicit inferential claims.
True
It is not the case that an evoked sense of pity is always logically irrelevant to an argument's conclusion.
True
It is possible for a single argument to commit more than one fallacy of relevance.
True
No fallacious arguments are good arguments.
True
"necessarily" and "certainly" are typical deductive indicators.
True
A "leading question" is distinct from a "complex question."
True
A disjunctive syllogism must have an "either...or..." statement in its premises.
True
A passage's introductory statement is often not a part of the argument itself.
True
A set of loosely associated statements does not contain an inferential relationship.
True
A sound deductive argument cannot have any false premises.
True
A statement is true if it reflects an actual state of affairs
True
A strong inductive argument may have premises and a conclusion that are all false.
True
A substitution instance is produced by uniformly substituting terms or statements for the letters in an argument form.
True
A successful counterexample will use statements with indisputable truth values and terms with precise definitions.
True
A weak inductive argument cannot be cogent.
True
All arguments with false premises are either unsound or uncogent
True
All deductive arguments are either completely valid or completely invalid.
True
Although geometry uses analogies in its reasoning, geometric arguments are still deductive.
True
Not all fallacious arguments have false premises
True
In a deductive argument, the arguer claims that it is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false.
true
The hasty generalization fallacy is an example of a fallacy of weak induction.
true
