Philosophy Exam 3
Consequentialism
maintains that morality, and moral terms, are defined solely by end-result or consequences. (Right/wrong) (just/unjust) (duty of obligation)
Example of Moral principle
it is morally wrong to intentionally take the life of an innocent person; and the punishment should fit the crime.
Explain the hierarchal structure of moral reasoning
(Top of Structure) Metaethics: the search for ultimate justification in ethics Moral theory: Moral theories evolve out of an area of inquiry within ethics known as metaethics Moral principle(s): Moral principles come from moral theories Moral judgment: Specific moral judgments evolve out of moral principles Moral action: As rational individuals, our specific moral actions come from the specific moral judgments or decisions we render (Bottom of Structure)
Ethical Egoism vs Psychological Egoism
Ethical Egoism: each person has 1 primary duty, it is to maximize self- interest Psychological Egoism: theory of human motivation, human beings are "hardwired" in a way that they always seek to maximize self interest
Ethical Egoism versus Altruism:
Ethical Egoism: every individual has 1 primary duty, it is to maximize self-interest. These terms are polar opposites. Altruism: the view that we sometimes have duties to act unselfishly on behalf of others.
Ethical egoism
Ethical egoism is a consequentialist moral theory because it maintains that individuals act rightly to the extent that each person maximizes SELF-INTEREST as an end. Utilitarianism is a consequentialist moral theory because it maintains that individuals act rightly to the extent that their actions or rules maximize OVERALL HAPPINESS as an end.
The meaning behind ("ought implies can")
I have a duty to perform an action if, and only if, I can perform it (this is the principle of "ought implies can") -for example, a person doesn't have a duty to fly like a bird, because the person in incapable of flying; nor does any person have a duty to see through walls with x-ray vision, because no person has this ability
Normative Ethics vs Descriptive Ethics
Normative ethics critiques the morality of people in general as well as that of social groups by way of evaluating whether these social practices are consistent with the way people OUGHT to behave. Descriptive Ethics: Is simply an account of the way people and societies do IN FACT behave
Example of moral action
casting our vote as jurors that Tsarnaev be executed
Example of Moral Judgment
deciding Tsarnaev should be executed; and deciding to cast our vote accordingly
Factual/ Descriptive Propositions:
statements of perceived fact; non value judgements
Example of Metaethics
the search for ultimate justification in ethics
Normative propositions:
value judgements; a person expresses positive or negative attitudes towards something
Example of Moral Theory
we ought to maximize the overall balance of unhappiness over unhappiness (this is a moral theory known as utilitarianism); we calculate that executing Tsarnaev will maximize the overall balance of happiness over unhappiness