Chapter 9
comparative advantage (World Trade Organization publication calls )
"arguably the single most powerful insight in economics."
sources of comparative advantages
1) climate and natural resources 2) relative abundance of labor and or capital 3) technological differences 4) external economices
two observations about international trade.
1. Trade allows a country "to produce more with less." 2. There is little doubt who wins [from trade] in the long run: consumers.
japan exports
12% gdp
japan trade
20% of gdp
Why do countries not completely specialize?
Because production of most goods involves increasing opportunity costs. Because tastes for products differ. Because not all goods are traded internationally.
reason for all trade
Comparative advantage is, arguably, the underlying
trade with country
Every country, no matter how poor, will have a comparative advantage in producing some good. (Often countries are poor because they cannot or will not trade with others.)
If the government imposes a tariff, which area shows the government tariff revenue?
Government tariff revenue is equal to the imports multiplied by the tariff. Area C is the government's tariff revenue.
Arguments for Protection
Protect national security. Protect infant industries. Protect high wages. Save jobs.
net exports
exports - imports
trade deficit
imports > exports
A tariff
is basically an ad valorem tax on imports.
us exports is typically smaller than imports
since 1980
Autarky
situation when countries do not trade
free trade benefits
small country with fewer people more
us stops inter trade
some service industry + agriculture industry + manufacturing industry will see sales decline
why dont we see complete specialization?
th the real world products are not generally produced by one nation reasons include 1) not all goods and services can be traded internationally 2) production of many goods involves increasing opportunity costs 3) tastes for products differ; countries might have comparative advantages in different sub-types of products
The primary difference between a quota and a voluntary export restraint (VER) is that
the quota is unilaterally imposed by one nation on the other while the VER is the result of negotiations between nations.
importance on intra trade in us
though it is steadily increasing not all sectors have been affected
importance on intra trade
us has smaller fraction than most other countries
country benefits from free trade
A country benefits from free trade even if other countries do not engage in it. It gains because it can obtain goods and services at a lower opportunity cost via trading.
What is a quota?
A numerical limit a government imposes on the quantity of a good that can be imported into a country.
Autarky
A situation in which a country does not trade with other countries
What is a voluntary export restraint?
A voluntary export restraint is an agreement negotiated between two countries that places a numerical limit on the quantity of a good that can be imported by one country from the other country.
quota
Another restriction with a similar outcome would be to impose a limit on the amount of a specific good that can be imported. This restriction is called a
who benefits from trade
Both countries benefited from their bilateral trade. It is not possible to determine which country benefited more; however, the question asked assumes that exports benefit a country more than its imports. This is a fallacy. Countries gain when they import goods that are not produced in their own country or can only be produced at a higher cost domestically. The concept of comparative advantage proves that trade is mutually beneficial.
GATT
By the end of World War II in 1945, government officials in the United States and Europe were looking for a way to reduce tariffs and revive international trade. To help achieve this goal, they set up the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) in 1948.
benefits and who loses from dumping
Consumers benefit while competing firms lose;
country gains
Countries gain from specializing in producing goods in which they have a comparative advantage and trading for goods in which other countries have a comparative advantage.
country shifts resources toward producing only those goods where it has a comparative advantage, it is specializing in the production of those goods.
However, there are several reasons why countries do not completely specialize: 1. Not all goods and services can be traded internationally. 2. At some point, producing more of a particular good involves increasing opportunity costs. 3. Consumers in different countries have different tastes and preferences.
tariff
If the government wants to protect import competing industries and its workers from foreign competition, it can impose a tax on imports called a
What is meant by a country specializing in the production of a good?
It shifts resources toward producing only those goods where it has a comparative advantage;
Explain how it is possible that middle- and lower-income Americans are both the biggest losers and at the same time the biggest winners from free trade.
It would be possible for middle- and lower-income Americans to be both the biggest losers and at the same time the biggest winners from free trade if they are the ones most likely to work in industries that produce at higher opportunity cost than in other countries and purchase those goods that can be produced at lower opportunity cost in other countries
positive economic analysis example
Measuring the effect of the sugar quota on the U.S. economy is an example of positive economic analysis.
fact 1
Once a country has lost its comparative advantage in producing a good, its income will be higher and its economy will be more efficient if it switches from producing the good to importing it.
Economists believe the most persuasive argument for protectionism is to protect infant industries. But the argument has a drawback. What is this drawback?
Protection lessens the need for firms to become productive enough to compete with foreign firms; this often results in infant industries never "growing up."
Protectionism is the use of trade barriers
Protectionism is the use of trade barriers to shield domestic firms from foreign competition. For as long as international trade has existed, governments have attempted to restrict it to protect domestic firms. Protectionism is usually justified on the basis of one of the following arguments: saving jobs; protecting high wages; protecting infant industries; protecting national security.
Dumping
Selling a product for a price below its cost of production.
terms of trade
Since countries are producing goods and services at different opportunity costs, terms of trade can be negotiated that will allow all countries to consume more with trade than in autarky.
Why do some people oppose the World Trade Organization (WTO)?
Some opponents desire to erect trade barriers to protect domestic firms from foreign competition. B. Some opponents are specifically against the globalization process that began in the 1980s and became widespread in the 1990s. C. Some critics of the WTO support globalization in principle but believe that the WTO favors the interests of the high-income countries at the expense of the low-income countries.
GATT was replaced by the World Trade Organization (WTO).
The GATT agreement covered only goods. As trade in services and in products incorporating intellectual property grew in importance, many GATT members pressed for a new agreement that would cover services and intellectual property, as well as goods. A new agreement was negotiated, and in January 1995, GATT was replaced by the World Trade Organization (WTO
events led to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
The Great Depression and the Smoot-Hawley Tariff
Sherman antitrust act of 1890
The Sherman antitrust act of 1890 made it illegal for firms to engage in anticompetitive practices.
How does the World Trade Organization (WTO) allow countries to determine whether dumping has occurred?
The WTO allows countries to determine that dumping has occurred if a product is exported for a lower price than it sells for on the home market.
comparative advantage
The ability of an individual, a firm, or a country to produce a good or service at a lower opportunity cost than competitors is known as
advantages the Bay Area
The advantages the Bay Area has are likely to persist over time because more software firms will locate there, enhancing the external economies
deadweight loss is the area(s)
The deadweight loss is the area(s) that represent the reduction in economic surplus resulting from a market not being in competitive equilibrium.
domestic producer surplus
The domestic producer surplus is the area above the supply curve and below the price line
economy as whole loses
The economy as whole loses because a tariff or a quota produces a deadweight loss, which is the loss of economic surplus caused by the tariff or quota.
if meat import is banned
The prices charged by U.S. producers will rise by the amount of the tariff or more, if foreign competition is entirely eliminated. With a tariff, the price in the U.S. will be Upper P Subscript US PUS instead of the world price, Upper P Subscript Upper W Baseline . PW. If imports are banned altogether, the price in the U.S. will rise to Upper P Subscript NT Baseline comma PNT, the no-trade price. Also, if the imported goods are a different style or quality than the U.S. goods, U.S. consumers will face a reduced variety of goods.
Globalization
The process of countries becoming more open to foreign trade and investment.
problems arise when implementing anti-dumping laws
The true production costs are not easy for foreign governments to calculate.
quantity limits
The two kinds of quantity limits discussed in the text are quotas and voluntary import restraints. Quotas can be imposed by the government.
economic nationalism
The use of quotas to protect domestic industries. The use of tariffs to protect domestic industries. The use of non-tariff barriers to protect domestic industries.
Protectionism
The use of trade barriers to shield domestic firms from foreign competition.
better athletes
This is a normative question. Objectively, one can conclude that Usain Bolt ran faster than Eaton in the 100 meter race, but it is doubtful whether Bolt would defeat Eaton any of the other decathlon events.
free trade
Trade between countries that is without government restrictions.
World Trade Organization eventually replace GATT
Trade in services and in products incorporating intellectual property grew in importance
specializes in the production
When a country specializes in the production of the goods or services in which it has a comparative advantage, it will be allocating resources toward their most productive use. Then, it can exchange these goods and services for other goods and services. By doing this, it will be able to consume more than without trade.
job loss
When more-efficient foreign firms drive less-efficient domestic firms out of business, jobs are lost, but jobs are also lost when more-efficient domestic firms drive less-efficient domestic firms out of business. These job losses are rarely permanent. In the U.S. economy, jobs are lost and new jobs are created continually.
does 6trade barriers protect domestic jobs.
While some jobs are saved by trade restrictions, many more jobs are lost in industries that use trade restricted goods as inputs. It is a fallacy to think that trade barriers protect domestic jobs.
Quota
a numerical limit a government imposes on the quality of a good that can be imported into that country
Tariff
a tax imposed by a government on imports
Comparative advantage is,
arguably, the underlying reason for all trade
why poor
because they cannot or will not trade with others
globalization is opposed because
believe globalization destroys the distinctive cultures of many countries. want to erect trade barriers to protect domestic firms from foreign competition. believe globalization favors the interests of high-income countries at the expense of low-income countries.
high tariffs
believing that such measured made their own firms and consumers better off
International trade can help consumers
by keeping prices down. Businesses that use the imported products or inputs also benefit from less expensive imports. But the cheaper imports can negatively affect the companies that are directly competing with the imports. Consequently, workers in these sectors can also lose jobs.
cheaper imports can negatively affect
cheaper imports can negatively affect the companies that are directly competing with the imports. Consequently, workers in these sectors can also lose jobs.
GDP
consumption spending + gross private domestic investment + government spending + net Exports
external economies
decrease in cost with the increase in size4
us economy dont relay
dont rely on inter trade as it is a small % of gdp
trade surplus
exports > imports
protection from free trade
for quotas or tariffs
opponents of globalization contend
globalization destroys cultures.
imports
goods and services bought domestically but produced in other countries
exports
goods and services produced domestically but sold in other countries
powerful insight because
it explains why if individuals, firms, and countries specialize and trade they will be better off
terms of trade
its the ratio at which a country can trade its exports for imports from other countries no country would accept terms of trade worse than its opportunity cost
tariff removes no opposition
lowers the cost of imports from other countries
Removing a tariff on imports of canned tuna
lowers the price of tuna in the United States, and U.S. producers decrease the quantity they supply. U.S. consumers increase their purchases. Equilibrium rises. Removal of the tuna tariff causes a gain of consumer surplus equal to the area under the demand curve between the initial price after the tariff and the price before the tariff.
gains from trade
more consumption
us economy gdp
more imports n exports to what they were 40 years ago
Is it typical for countries to be completely specialized?
no
country trades
when it has comparative advantage
deadweight loss
which is the loss of economic surplus caused by the tariff or quota
Smoot-Hawley Tariff in 1930
which raised average tariff rates to more than 50 percent. As other countries retaliated by raising their tariffs, international trade collapsed.
Are they correct in asserting that free trade costs U.S. jobs?
No, since free trade creates more jobs for the U.S. economy than it costs the U.S.