Com235#3
Use collaborative terms
(we,us,our) not individual terms (I, me, mine, you, your, yours)
Sias & Cahill's transitions in co-worker relationships (3)
-Acquaintance to friend -Friend to close friend -Close friend to almost best friend
Negative consequences of workplace relationships (4)
-Commodity -Information retrieval -Codependency -Giving support may work against the person providing it
Guidelines for managing differential treatment
-Employees talk to one another to make sense of the differential treatment -Talk centers on determining the "fairness" of the differential treatment -Must be managed with: TEAM MEETINGS
Elements of the formal evaluation
-Encourage employee participation- the employee should do much of the talking -Establish job-related goals with employee -Contain specific and limited criticism -Be private
Primary types of peer relationships (3)
-Informational peer -Collegial peer -Special peer
Types of workplace conflict
-Interpersonal: between you and another person -Intergroup: within the group -Intagroup: outside of the group
Interpersonal needs
-Must feel included -Give and receive affection -Some control over relationship
Workplace friendship functions
-Power and influence -Social support -Information processing
Guidelines for providing effective negative feedback (5)
-Private location -Begin with positive statement -Let employee explain -Provide specific guidance and instruction for improving performance -Don't raise your voice, interrupt, ignore employee, or make fun of them
How to avoid rating errors
-Provide informal feedback throughout the year -Document all informal feedback conversations over evaluation period
Principles of interpersonal relationships (3)
-Proxemics -Symmetrical -Interpersonal needs
Influences of how individuals handle conflict at work
-Relationship with other party, Issue salience (importance/accuracy/clarity_, personality
Performance feedback (5 dimensions)
-Valence -Timeliness -Specificity -Frequency -Sensitivity
Unique characteristics of workplace friendships
-Voluntary: you cant choose your co-workers, but you can choose which ones to be friends with -Personalistic focus: treat friend as "whole person" not work role occupant
Impact on differential treatment on peer relationships/communication (MATRIX)
-could be good because it could be learning opportunity for organization -workplace bullying -creates uncertainty
John Challenger's relationship guidelines
1. Clear definitions of what types of relationships are allowed and between who 2. Definitions of what behaviors are considered appropriate in the work environment. Hand holds? Share emails? 3. Managers should meet with romantically involved couples to be assured that the relationship is consensual and not violating any organizational sexual harassment policies
Formal evaluation/feedback
A written record of employee's overall job performance; becomes part of the employees personal profile
Administrative function of evaluations
Administrative decisions; documentation for potential grievance proceedings (sales, promotions, discipline)
Timeliness
Amount of time between performance and feedback about performance (sooner is better)
Goal theories
Assume that people are motivated to achieve specific goals
Need-based theories
Assume that to motivate someone you must fulfill their needs
The loose rater (rating error)
Avoids confrontation by giving average ratings
Recency error (rating error)
Based on recent events
Causes of friendship deterioration
Betrayal, conflicting expectations, distracting life events, personality conflict, work promotion
Romantic relationships in the workplace- BENEFICIAL:
Can increase teamwork, communication flow, and job satisfaction
Acquaintance to friend
Caused by: environmental factors like being in the same physical space and sharing tasks/socializing outside of work
Friend to close friend
Caused by: problems or events in both personal life and work life. Communication is more intimate and open.
Close friend to almost best friend
Caused by: socializing outside of work, shared life events, and work related problems. TRUST is increased and discussions about work and personal life become much more detailed
Codependency
Co=worker becomes dependent on the relationship to the extent that he is no longer able to act independently. (Does not want to take on a new project if they have to move work areas away from other person)
Extrinsic incentive
Comes from outside of the individual. Rewards are money and grades and threat of punishment (EXTERNAL MOTIVATION)
Accommodation (conflict management style)
Concern for relationship, emphasis on relationship over problem. Win-lose approach
Informal evaluation/feedback
Continuous feedback from supervisor throughout the year, usually regarding specific portions of the employees performance
Motivation definition
Degree to which an individual is personally committed to expending effort in the accomplishment of a specified activity or goal
Competition (conflict management style)
Dominating and forcing; concern for self, emphasis on winning, win-lose approach
Outcomes and consequences of workplace friendships
Employee adjustment: Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, stress (workplace romances)
Length of service bias (rating error)
Employee assumed to be doing their job effectively based on prior experience
Framing conflict
Example: the office (win-win) (lose-lose) conflict whether the poster is put up or is kept down because it creeps oscar out -the poster can be put somewhere he could not see it
Intrinsic incentive
Exists within the individual vs. external pressure, pleasure of activity vs, reward, driven by enjoyment of task itself (INTERNAL MOTIVATION)
Sensitivity
Extent to which negative feedback is provided in a way that "saves face" for the employee
Giving support may work against the person providing it:
Give information about an opportunity you want but do not want the other person to want as well, but feel obligated to tell them about it
Commodity
Given by one person to be "owed" support at some future time. The "social cost" of the relationship in terms of time and energy (might expect you to cover their shift for a favor)
Romantic relationships in the workplace- DETRIMENTAL:
Hard to separate personal and professional lives when two workers are intertwined and can affect work performance. Deterioration of relationship can strain work environment. OR could lead to harassment
Developmental function
Help to improve job performance: reinforce effective performance/behavior; change ineffective performance/behavior
Frequency
How often feedback is provided
Disengagement tactics/relationship deterioration
How people leave job: depersonalization and withdrawal
Social construction
Humans construct the world through social practices and social processes (boys shouldn't cry, women eat salads and men prefer bbq)
Organizational relationships
INVOLUNTARY. When an organizational structure has forced two people to spend time together on a mutual task, they are participating in a dyadic relationships. Many remain mostly task oriented or could become a personal relationship.
Impact on differential treatment on peer relationships/communication (MATRIX) EXAMPLE 1:
In a machinery area, a coworker from other coworker to get a drill and bosses him around. This leaves the bossed around co-worker feeling unmotivated and used
Positive consequences of workplace relationships
Individuals are able to share workplace experiences and help one another make sense of them, can talk to their co-workers about organizational phenomena that friends outside the organization might not understand, can provide: emotional, social and task support and can benefit the organization by reducing employee turnover. Can provide a support system that supplies information and feedback might not otherwise receive, this can lead to organization loyalty.
Conflict definition
Interaction of interdependent people who perceive opposition of goals, aims and values and who see the other party as potentially interfering with the realization of those goals
Information retrieval
Make the other person feel she should give the should give the support some information not exactly available to the supporter. If the other person does not have anything to share as well, the one who told could feel used
Feedback exercise
Manger at coffee shop in college town. Most customers are college students. New employee: Chris has been having trouble at work (customer service). Rude and snappy toward the customers especially during busy periods and complains to other workers. -As manager: not let him work on the busy schedule until he picks up the job and is more comfortable -Make sure he is trained without it being too costly, going to change the culture if you fire him right away, make sure it is in private rather than in front of any other employees
Negative consequences of organization conflict
More stressful and more tension
The halo effect (rating error)
Most common error. Supervisor gives favorable ratings to all job duties based on impressive performance in just ONE job function
Expectancy-valence theory
Motivation governs how individuals choose among different voluntary activities/goals
Intrinsic incentive example
Motivation within Kramer: did the job for himself and his own feelings not for the money, he didn't even have the job, giving feedback and evaluation was key to him
Cooperative and problem solving attitude
Must want to solve problem, focus discussion on problem not the person, be open-minded to other viewpoints
Competitive rater (rating error)
No one under the supervision should be given higher performance rating than supervisor receives
Feedback example: The office (it's all up there)
Not accepting feedback or evaluations meant to make you a better worker/employee. What he did wrong was he kept his state of mind about how he was doing . He thought he was doing it well not matter what someone else said
Interpersonal relationships (2)
Organizational relationships and Personal relationships
Factors that promote friendship development
Personality, demographic and perceived similarity, proximity, shared tasks and projects, shared tasks and projects, socializing, work related problems (can lead to gossip) and life events
Valence
Positive or negative
Informational peer
Primary function is INFORMATION SHARING. Low levels of trust and self disclosure, talk about work and job related feedback, most co-worker relationships are information peer relationships, low levels of cohesion and lower quality information sharing
Special peer
Primary function is confirmation, emotional support, close friendship, "best friend" at work; high levels of trust; rarest type of co-worker relationship, low levels of supervisor consideration
Collegial peer
Primary function: career-strategizing, job related feedback and friendship, moderate levels of trust and self disclosure, information sharing, emotional support, feedback (personal and job related) and confirmation, discussion of personal as well as work related concerns, high levels of cohesion, higher quality of information sharing
Impact on differential treatment on peer relationships/communication (MATRIX) EXAMPLE 2:
Quest diversity. michael the boss: favors a certain coworker and does not give a bigger workload to other coworkers which results in a discouraged and insecure coworker
Central tendency (rating error)
Rater rates everyone down the middle
Herzberg's theory (need-based)
Satisfaction and dissatisfaction are not the same dimension. Assumes people have two types of needs: -Hygiene needs: met by extrinsic rewards (pay, benefits) -Motivational needs: intrinsic rewards (achievements, etc)
Tight rater (rating error)
Seldom rates employee as excellent
Feedback sandwich
Start out with a positive and then a negative and then end with a positive
Positive consequences of organization conflict
Teaches you how to deal with different personalities
The pitchfork effect (rating error)
The opposite of halo. Gives all negative ratings based on poor performance of one thing
Personal relationship
VOLUNTARY. When two people choose to spend time with each other due to mutual emotional needs.
Specificity
Vague versus detailed feedback
Symmetrical
When the two partners are equal in the relationship. They participate equally to make decisions and share control over what they do together.
Conflict management exercise
You and co-worker, megan requested vacation time, but boss says cant be out of office at the same time because someone needs to be there to cover responsibilities. Asked you and megan to deal with the problem -trust and respect (one could take off the first week and then one could take off the second week)
Identify common goals
between supervisor and worker
Proxemics
friendships develop based on which individuals happen to share the same space. More likely to develop friendship when in constant contact.
Establishing and maintaining effective workplace relationships
resolves conflict