EXTENSION APPROACH

Réussis tes devoirs et examens dès maintenant avec Quizwiz!

Implementation: • Demonstration plots are major techniques

Commodity specialized approach

Disadvantages: expensive and inefficient

General agricultural extension approach

Program Planning: Centralized. What to teach and when to teach it is decided upon by professionals and is delivered down to farmers

The Training and Visit Approach

different extension approaches

1. General agricultural extension approach 2. Commodity Specialized Approach 3. project approach 4. Farming systems development approach 5. Training and visit system approach 6. The cost-sharing approach 7. agricultural extension participatory approach 8. Educational Institution Approach

extension approach embodies

1. it embodies the philosophy of a system. 2. spells the doctrines of the system 3. style of action which by and large; determines the direction and nature/style of the various aspects of the system.

embraces the entire spectrum of the process. It states a point of view, a philosophy, an article of faith (Garcia 1989). Within an approach there can be several methods.

APPROACH

general nature: Highly specialized

Commodity Specialized Approach

Advantages: Closer management and supervision.

Commodity Specialized approach

Advantages: Easier to monitor and evaluate.

Commodity Specialized approach

Advantages: Fewer farmers per extension worker.

Commodity Specialized approach

Advantages: Focus on a narrow range of technical concerns.

Commodity Specialized approach

Advantages: Higher salary incentives.

Commodity Specialized approach

Advantages: Relatively more cost effective

Commodity Specialized approach

Advantages: Technology tends to "fit" the production problems and so extension messages ten d to be appropriate because of coordination with research and marketing people, messages tend to be delivered in a timely manner.

Commodity Specialized approach

Disadvantages: Commodity organization maybe promoting its commodity even in situations where it is no Ionger in the national interest to be increasing production of that particular commodity

Commodity Specialized approach

Disadvantages: Does not provide advisory service to other aspects of farming.

Commodity Specialized approach

Disadvantages: Interests of farmers may have less priority than those of commodity organization.

Commodity Specialized approach

Measure of Success: Increase in yield, and total production of the crops being emphasized

Commodity Specialized approach

Basic Assumption: The way to increase productivity and production of a particular commodity is to concentrate on th at one grouping extension with such other functions as research, input supply, output marketing, credit, and sometimes price control, will make the whole system productive.

Commodity specialized approach

Implementation: • Carried by a large field staff assigned throughout the country

Commodity specialized approach

Program Planning: • Controlled by the commodity organization

Commodity specialized approach

purpose: Increase production of a particular commodity

Commodity specialized approach

purpose: • Sometimes to increase utilization of a particular agricultural input

Commodity specialized approach

Advantages: Interpret national government policies and procedures to the local people: covers the whole nation: relatively rapid communication from the ministry level to rural people

General agricultural extension approach

Basic Assumption: technology and information are available but are not being used by the farmers. If these could be communicated to farmers, farm practices would be improved

General agricultural extension approach

Disadvantages: Fails to adjust extension messages to different localities.

General agricultural extension approach

Disadvantages: Field staff not accountable to rural people.

General agricultural extension approach

Disadvantages: Lacks two-way flow of communication.

General agricultural extension approach

General Nature : Transfer of technology (TOT)

General agricultural extension approach

Implementation: Demonstration plots are major techniques

General agricultural extension approach

Implementation: carried by a large field staff assigned throughout the country

General agricultural extension approach

Program Planning: Changes in priority, from time to time, are made on a national basis with some freedom for local adaptation

General agricultural extension approach

Program Planning: controlled by the government

General agricultural extension approach

measure of success: Increase in national production of the commodities being emphasized in the national program

General agricultural extension approach

purpose: To help farmers increasing their production

General agricultural extension approach

It is procedural consisting of a series of actions arrange logically for the smooth flow of operation. It is the procedure or step by step guiding prospective clients.

METHOD

It is a particular trick, strategy, individual artistry of the teachers/EW.

Technique

Disadvantages :Pressure people might bring on central units. People's influence on personnel management like transfer, selection, promotion, etc.

The Agricultural Extension Participatory Approach

General Nature: Puts responsibility of determining agricultural extension programs in the hands of farmers making them partners with GOs and NGOs

The Agricultural Extension Participatory Approach (AEPA

Basic Assumption: Extension efficiency is gained by focusing on important points based on expressed needs of farmers.

The Agricultural Extension Participatory Approach (AEPA)

Basic Assumption: Needed is participation of farmers, research, and related services

The Agricultural Extension Participatory Approach (AEPA)

Basic Assumption: There is a reinforcing expect in group learning and group action

The Agricultural Extension Participatory Approach (AEPA)

Basic Assumption: • That farming people have much wisdom regarding food production from their land.

The Agricultural Extension Participatory Approach (AEPA)

Disadvantages • Lack of control of program from central government. Difficulty of managing, reporting and accounting.

The Agricultural Extension Participatory Approach (AEPA)

Implementation: Features many meetings and discussions of farmers' problems

The Agricultural Extension Participatory Approach (AEPA)

Implementation: • Exploring situations with extension officers

The Agricultural Extension Participatory Approach (AEPA)

Pleasure of Success: Extent of participation of key stakeholders in program planning and implementation

The Agricultural Extension Participatory Approach (AEPA)

Pleasure of Success: • Continuity of local extension organization s and the benefits to the community

The Agricultural Extension Participatory Approach (AEPA)

Program Planning: Controlled locally, often by farmers' association

The Agricultural Extension Participatory Approach (AEPA)

purpose: To increase production of farming people; increase consumption and enhance the quality of life or rural people

The Agricultural Extension Participatory Approach (AEPA)

Program Planning: Shared by various levels paying the cost but must be responsive to local interest in order to maintain cooperative financial arrangements

The Cost-Sharing Approach

Advantages: Effective communication between local people and extension worker.

The Cost-Sharing Approach (CSA)

Advantages: Higher adoption rates.

The Cost-Sharing Approach (CSA)

Advantages: Lesser cost. Stimulates increased awareness, confidence, and activity among farm people.

The Cost-Sharing Approach (CSA)

Advantages: Local people tend to have strong voice in program planning

The Cost-Sharing Approach (CSA)

Advantages: Lower cost Eo central government and local people.

The Cost-Sharing Approach (CSA)

Advantages: Relevance or fit of the program. Mutually supportive relationships which develop among participants

The Cost-Sharing Approach (CSA)

Advantages: Some measure of local control of program planning increases relevance of program content and methods to needs of client.

The Cost-Sharing Approach (CSA)

Basic Assumption: Program would more likely serve interest of the client if costs are shared between "outside" sponsors and "inside" target groups

The Cost-Sharing Approach (CSA)

Basic Assumption: • Any non-formal education program is more likely to achieve its goals if those who benefit from it share some part of the cost

The Cost-Sharing Approach (CSA)

Basic Assumption:• Commitment of learners to participate if they pay some part of the costs

The Cost-Sharing Approach (CSA)

Disadvantages : More difficult for central government to control either program or personnel

The Cost-Sharing Approach (CSA)

Measure of Success: Farm people's willingness and ability to provide some share of the cost, individually or through their local government units

The Cost-Sharing Approach (CSA)

purpose: To make fun din g of agricultural extension affordable and sustainable both at central and local levels

The Cost-Sharing Approach (CSA)

Implementation: Through partnership of research and extension personnel with the local people, taking a systems approach to the farm

The Farming System s Development Approach

Implementation: • Requires research personnel to go to the farm, listen to farmers and in collaboration with them and the extension personnel, understand the farm as a system

The Farming System s Development Approach

Basic Assumption: • Technology which fits the needs of farmers particularly the small farmers, is not available and needs to be generated locally

The Farming System s Development Approach (FSDA)

Disadvantages: Some degree of difficulty in working in a multi disciplinary team. No quick results in development of appropriate technology

The Farming System s Development Approach (FSDA)

Measure of Success: Extent to which farm people adopt technologies developed in the program and continue to use them overtime

The Farming System s Development Approach (FSDA)

Program Planning: Evolve slowly during the process for different climatic farm ecosystem types since program takes into account a holistic approach to the plants, animals, and the people in each particular location

The Farming Systems Development Approach

Advantages: Effective communication between local people and extension personnel.

The Farming Systems Development Approach (FSDA)

Advantages: Higher adoption rates.

The Farming Systems Development Approach (FSDA)

Advantages: Local control of program planning increases relevance of program content and methods to needs and interests of clientele.

The Farming Systems Development Approach (FSDA)

Advantages: Lower cost to central government and local people

The Farming Systems Development Approach (FSDA)

general nature: Interdisciplinary approach, /.e., involves several scientific disciplines

The Farming Systems Development Approach (FSDA)

purpose: To provide extension persons, and through their farm people, with research results tailored to meet the needs and interests of local farming systems conditions

The Farming Systems Development Approach (FSDA)

Implementation: • Flow of good ideas from the project to areas outside the project

The Project Approach

Implementation: • Includes a project management stall, project allowances for field staff, better transportation, facilities, equipment and housing than regular government programs

The Project Approach

Program Planning: Controlled by outsiders, with central government, the don or agency or some combination

The Project Approach

Advantages: Focus enables evaluation of effectiveness and sometimes "quick results" for a foreign donor.

The Project Approach (PA)

Advantages: Novel techniques and methods can be treated and experimented with within the limits of the project

The Project Approach (PA)

Basic Assumption: Better results can be achieved in a particular location, during a specified time period, with large infusion of outside resources, high impact activities, carried out under artificial circumstances, will have some continuity after outside financial support is no longer available

The Project Approach (PA)

Disadvantages: Double standards.

The Project Approach (PA)

Disadvantages: When money ends, project extension programs most often end also

The Project Approach (PA)

Disadvantages: usually too short time period. Money provided tends to be more than what is appropriate.

The Project Approach (PA)

Measure of Success: Increase in yield, and total production of the crops being emphasized

The Project Approach (PA)

general nature: Fixed period of time, large funding

The Project Approach (PA)

purpose: To demonstrate, within project area, what can be accomplished on a relatively short period of time

The Project Approach (PA)

purpose: To test the validity of alternative extension methods

The Project Approach (PA)

Basic Assumption: Extension personnel poorly trained, not up-to-date and tend not to visit farmers, but stay in offices

The Training and Visit Approach

Basic Assumption: Two-way communication between research and extension units and between extension staff and farmers can be achieved

The Training and Visit Approach

Basic Assumption: • Management and supervision is not adequate

The Training and Visit Approach

General Nature: highly disciplined and patterned with fixed schedules for training of extension workers, SMSs, and visits by extension workers to farmers.

The Training and Visit Approach

Implementation: Fortnightly visits by village extension workers to small groups of farmers or to individual "contact" farmers

The Training and Visit Approach

Implementation: • Fortnightly training of village extension workers (VEW) by SMSs

The Training and Visit Approach

Program Planning: • Program planning follows cropping pattern of priority crops

The Training and Visit Approach

purpose: To induce farmers to increase production of specified crops

The Training and Visit Approach

Advantages: Brings discipline to the system village extension workers become more up-to-date with information. Closer technical supervision

The Training and Visit Approach {T & V)

Advantages: pressure on governments to organize a large number of small agricultural units into one integrated system

The Training and Visit Approach {T & V)

Disadvantages: High long-term costs to governments due to expanding size of VEWs.

The Training and Visit Approach {T & V)

Disadvantages: Lack of actual two-way communication.

The Training and Visit Approach {T & V)

Disadvantages: Lack of flexibility to change programs as needs and interests of farmers change staff tires of vigorous, patterned activities without appropriate rewards

The Training and Visit Approach {T & V)

Disadvantages: Technology relevant to farmers not integrated.

The Training and Visit Approach {T & V)

Measure of Success: Increase in yield, and total production of the crops being emphasized

The Training and Visit Approach {T & V)

An organized and coherent combination of strategies and methods, designed to make rural extension effective in a certain area designed to make rural extension effective in a certain area.

extension approach

Are approaches and method chosen or develop to reach a particular set of goal; used to define the operational design by means of which the national government, or other sponsoring organizations, implements its policies.

strategies


Ensembles d'études connexes

Tema 6 - Los Reyes Católicos II

View Set

history nationalism + imperialism quiz october 11 - alex sinins

View Set

Pharmacology Exam 2 Chapter 9-11 PrepU Questions

View Set

What Are Natural Resources? practice

View Set

Bio 1110 Ch. 18 Introduction to Darwinian Evolution

View Set