HUSTLER MAGAZINE v. FALWELL

Réussis tes devoirs et examens dès maintenant avec Quizwiz!

HUSTLER MAGAZINE v. FALWELL

A lead story in the November 1983 issue of Hustler Magazine featured a "parody" of an advertisement, modeled after an actual ad campaign, claiming that Falwell, a FUNDAMENTALIST MINISTER AND POLITICAL LEADER, had a drunken incestuous relationship with his mother in an outhouse. Falwell sued to recover damages for libel, INVASION OF PRIVACY, and INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS. Falwell won a jury verdict on the emotional distress claim and was awarded a total of $150,000 in damages. Hustler Magazine appealed.

QUESTION

Does the First Amendment's freedom of speech protection extend to the making of patently offensive statements about public figures, resulting perhaps in their suffering emotional distress?

UNANIMITY DECISION (8 votes for Hustler Magazine) (J. Kennedy took no part in the decision)

PUBLIC FIGURES, such as Jerry Falwell, MAY NOT RECOVER FOR THE INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS WITHOUT SHOWING THAT THE OFFENDING PUBLICATION CONTAINED A FALSE STATEMENT OF FACT WHICH WAS MADE WITH "ACTUAL MALICE." The Court added that THE INTEREST OF PROTECTING FREE SPEECH, UNDER THE FIRST AMENDMENT, SURPASSED THE STATE'S INTEREST IN PROTECTING PUBLIC FIGURES FROM PATENTLY OFFENSIVE SPEECH.


Ensembles d'études connexes

University of Notre Dame Microeconomics Final

View Set

Criminal and delinquent behavior final

View Set

vocab level g unit 5 definitions

View Set

Mathematics 800 Fundamentals - Unit 5: More With Functions SOLVING EQUATIONS WITH DISTRIBUTIVE PROPERTY

View Set

Философия сессия 2

View Set

PrepU Passpoint Coordinated Care

View Set

8th Grade Forces, Motion, and Energy 4-2

View Set

Chapter 8: The Adrenal Glands (Penny)

View Set

Industrial test, absolutism test, French rev test

View Set