Microeconomics Test 2
implicit
costs you don't actually have to pay for, but are still opportunity costs (subjective)
profit maximization
marfinal revenue=marginal cost
allocative efficiency
marginal benefits(demand)= marginal costs yes in short run and long run for perfect competition
supply=
marginal cost at prices above AVC
in perfect competition, what three things equal each other?
market price=marginal revenue= marginal cost
What could it do to improve the loss situation and make a profit in the long run?
market their product to get more people to want it
productive efficiency
minimum ATC short run only productively efficient at breakeven, long run always because we breakeven at minimum of ATC in perfect competition
price discrimination
need to distinguish different customers- mechanism of charging different prices - more profits, worse for customers (higher prices), higher quantity sold (some customer benefit)
economists want to make most amount, not biggest
percentage
monopoly produces at higher _____ and lower ____ than perf. comp
prices and quantity
increasing marginal returns
production going up very fast
in monopoly, it is not
productively efficient (cost is above min of ATC) and not allocative efficient MB don't equal MC
diminishing marginal returns
total production going up at a slower rate (if negative, starts going down) just a short run concept
economic profit=
total revenues- explicit costs- implicit costs
accounting profit=
total revenues-explicit costs
in monopoly market marginal revenue is always
twice as steep as demand
inputs in the short run are
variable, at least one input is fixed
why a patent?
will promote people to come up with ideas, spur innovation
Explain why a firm would stay in business even though it isn't making any profit.
you are making your opportunity cost as much as you could somewhere else - not better off or worse off, firm is at profit maximization, MR=MC
If no budget constraint (no scarcity), you consume until total utility is maximized, which means marginal utility equals
zero
Some restaurants offer "all you can eat" meals. How is this practice related to Diminishing Marginal Utility? What restrictions must the restaurant impose on the customer to make a profit?
A customer's satisfaction (utility) decreases as they eat more which prevents them from eating so much that the restaurant won't make profit. Restrictions: Can't take food home- must eat in restaurant, no sharing, some have time limits
why does demand slope downward- income effect (price independent, quantity dependent)
as price goes down, real income goes up, buy more NORMAL goods
why does demand slope downward - diminishing marginal utility
as quantity goes up, you get less additional satisfaction from each additional unit and therefore you are less willing to pay
diminishing marginal returns
as we add more and more of an input, we get less and less additional output
law of diminishing utility
as you have more of a good (not a thing, something you like), total utility increases, marginal utility decreases
Perfect competition assumptions
- identical products (commodities) - there are many buyers and sellers - ease of entry and exit - perfect information
barriers to entry
- patent- exclusive right to produce product (20 years), then people can copy - economies of scale (natural)- as quantity produced increases, cost per unit decreases (these are businesses where a lot of capital can make production cheaper) - control of natural resources - license - trademark- can't copy logo or name -copyright- legal right to creative work (music)
perfect competition implications
- price taker- everyone prices at the market price because products are identical - no long run profits
Monopoly Assumptions:
-one supplier -barriers to entry -unique product (no close substitutes) - imperfect information
Monopoly implications
-price maker- firms set the price within the limits of consumer demand -long fun profits are possible- barriers to entry--> don't get entry of new firms so can make profit
Is it possible for marginal utility to be negative while total utility is positive? If yes, under what circumstances is it possible?
Marginal Utility can be negative while total utility is positive because total utility increases at a decreasing rate of marginal utility. Marginal Utility will most likely not bring down totally utility to negative right away.
in a perfect competitive market with shut down- Explain why a firm might still choose to operate in the short run at this point or at less of a loss. Will it shut down if the price is lower?
The firm is no better off operating in the short run than shutting down.. firms will break even in LR when firms leave. if price goes below AVC, firm should definitely shut down because aren't even covering their variable cost of operating and will lose more staying open
diminishing marginal returns happens because
additional outputs (labor) have to share a fixed input (capital)--- short run
variables in the long run are
all inputs are variable
substitution effect (price independent, quantity dependent)
as price goes down, consume more of this good because relatively cheaper than other goods
if marginal utility turns negative, the good becomes a ____
bad
why should firms stay in long run if never making profit?
because they are making as much as they could in their next best alternative
Why can't monopolists charge any price they want?
because they have to listen to demand- what consumers are WTP- willing to walk away if price gets too high
explicit
cash payment, actually have to pay for
supply curve slopes upward because
diminishing marginal returns
monopoly- MR is twice as steep as demand for a monopolist, explain why this is the case thinking about the revenue brought in by each additional customer
each additional consumer is less willing to pay so monopolists must lower their price to sell them and that means lower price for everyone
MUx/Px = MUy/Py means
get the most bang your your buck
generally AP is
greater than EP
Qr always ____ than profit max
higher- MR-0 profit max
why is marginal revenue=marginal cost profit maximization?
if MR>MC... then the next unit will bring in more revenue/profit than the extra cost, so we should sell it
in a perfect competitive market with loss- if firm is losing money, why is it still operating?
if the firm closes doors, they still have to pay for fixed cost in short run, so if loosing less than fixed cost, they should stay open to help pay fo fixed cost
total costs=
implicit costs + explicit costs
dynamic efficiency
incentive to innovate- monopoly has this over perf. comp. because profit incentives drive innovation
natural monopoly
it's cheaper for just 1 firm to produce because isn't enough demand for 2 or more firms
economic profit
job is to make decisions- use both explicit and implicit costs
accountants
just looking at explicit costs- have to have proof
if we increase all inputs, production more than proportionally increase, so
long run average cost decreases
utility-
satisfaction a consumer gets from having a good or service
diminishing marginal returns is responsible for
the increasing marginal costs