Self efficacy theory
Previous performance
if i have done well before im more likely to do well again
Coaching efficacy
the extent to which coaches believe they have the capacity to affect the learning and performance of athletes SOURCES: •PAST PERFORMANCE AND EXPERIENCES •PERCEIVED ABILITY OF THE ATHLETES •PERCEIVED SOCIAL SUPPORT INFLUENCES: •COACHING BEHAVIOR •PLAYER SATISFACTION •PLAYER PERFORMANCE
who made the Self efficacy theory?
Albert Bandura (1986) professor and psychologist at university of Stanford Father of the social cognitive theory "IN ORDER TO SUCCEED, PEOPLE NEED A SENSE OF SELF-EFFICACY, TO STRUGGLE TOGETHER WITH RESILIENCE TO MEET THE INEVITABLE OBSTACLES AND INEQUITIES OF LIFE."
Verbal persuasion
Attempting to install self-efficacy beliefs through persuasive means Self talk : You can do this Zourbanos et al 2013 carried out a study that showed great effect of self talk
Coaching efficacy study on high school volleyball players (2003)
COACHING EFFICACY PREDICTED TEAM EFFICACY BUT NOT INDIVIDUAL PLAYER EFFICACY! TYPE OF COACHING EFFICACY: TEAM-RELATED COACHING MOTIVATION EFFICACY → TEAM EFFICACY CHARACTER BUILDING → ↓TEAM EFFICACY TECHNIQUE AND GAME STRATEGY HAD NO LINK TO TEAM EFFICACY (VARGAS-TONSING, WARNERS & FELTZ, 2003)
Imaginal states
How: Imaginal experiences can influence task-specific self-confidence (Maddux, 1995). What: Good or bad performance Yourself or others Self-modelling When: Rehearsal strategies(Garza & Feltz, 1998)
Emotional states
How: Offers information in the forming of efficacy perceptions What: Mood, affect, emotions When: Positive or negative Treasure et al. (1996) reported that self-efficacy prior to competition was +related to positive affect, and negatively related to negative affect.
Study on university coaches' leadership style
MOTIVATION EFFICACY AND TECHNICAL EFFICACY PREDICTED: -POSITIVE FEEDBACK BEHAVIOR -TRAINING AND INSTRUCTION BEHAVIOR
Physiological states
How: Interpreting physiological conditions which offers information What: Arousal Fear Pain Fatigue When: Pre competition Training
Vicarious experiences
Observing the performance of someone else, seeing the consequences of their performance, and using this information to make judgements about ones own performance. (Maddux, 1959)
Self efficacy is based on ...
- Previous performance (Past success and failures at similar tasks) -Vicarious experiences (seeing others) - Verbal persuasion (by others) - Physiological states - Emotional reactions (how we feel about the behavior) - Imaginal states
Self efficacy theory
SELF-EFFICACY IS DEFINED AS OUR JUDGEMENTS ABOUT OUR CAPABILITY TO SUCCESSFULLY PERFORM A TASK OR BEHAVIOR - NOT ACTUAL ABILITY (BANDURA, 1986). SELF-EFFICACY BELIEFS ARE NOT JUDGEMENTS OF ONE'S SKILLS, BUT RATHER WHAT ONE BELIEVES ONE CAN ACCOMPLISH WITH THOSE SKILLS (BANDURA, 1986) IT IS A MATTER OF PERSONAL SELF CONFIDENCE SELF-EFFICACY HAS BEEN SHOWN TO BE A SIGNIFICANT PREDICTOR OF ATHLETIC PERFORMANCE (FELTZ AND LIRGG 2001). WAS ONE OF THE CHIEF FACTORS OF PERFORMANCE OF OLYMPIC ATHLETES IN NAGANO (GOULD ET AL. 1999)
collective efficacy study on college athletes
START OF THE SEASON • OPTIMISM AND SELF-EFFICACY WERE MORE IMPORTANT ANTECEDENTS. • THE INFLUENCE OF SELF-EFFICACY DEPEND ON THEIR PERCEPTIONS OF OTHERS' SELF-EFFICACY! END OF THE SEASON • MORE UNIFORM COLLECTIVE EFFICACY • WERE PREDICTED BY COLLECTIVE EFFICACY AT THE START OF THE SEASON • COLLECTIVE EFFICACY APPEARS STABLE OVER TIME • INFLUENCES GROUP PERFORMANCE • CONFIDENT LEADERSHIP WAS RELATED TO STRONGER COLLECTIVE EFFICACY!
