tamworth industries ltd v attorney general
Year
1991
Treatment
Adopted Parker v British Airways Board "I adopt the analysis of Donaldson LJ in Parker". Considered Bridges v Hawkesworth Distinguished SSWC v Sharman Considered Hannah v Peel
Ratio Decedendi
An occupier of a property has not manifested an intention to exercise control over a property and the things that may be found on it or in it, in order to have a stronger claim to an article found there than the finder when the true owner cannot be found, if they have allowed unrestricted public access.
Obiter Dicta
Bank vault or house v public property (reference from Parker v British Airways Board).
Extra Information
Cur adv vult. Adopted finders law into New Zealand. Strongest New Zealand precedent. Level of control was not high enough even though on private property. Hidden = lost or abandoned Public has access even if it is private property
Judges
Eichelbaum C.J. (Chief Justice)
Reasoning
Evidence given does not support a manifest intention to exercise control. "Here, unlike the instances of a locked home, the fenced section or the bank vault. The static circumstances do not, to my mind, give rise to any interference in favour of the occupier at all". "The occupier has failed to discharge the burden of proving the existence of any manifest intention to exercise control over lost property. Accordingly, the plaintiffs claim must fail".
Defendant
Finder (Attorney General - on behalf of Police)
Court
High Court
Outcome
It was held that the finder had the superior claim to the item than the occupier.
Material Facts
Occupier leased a property where the public had a reasonable access to as it was unrestricted. An item was found in a box on the ground under the building. The true owner could not be found.
Plaintiff
Property owner/occupier (Tamworth Industries Ltd)
Citation
Tamworth Industries Ltd v Attorney General [1991] 3 NZLR 616
Issue
Whether an occupier of a property has manifested an intention to exercise control over a property and the things that may be on it, or in it, in order to have a superior claim to the item found, if they have allowed unrestricted public access to the property.