Analysis of algorithms practice exam Set 1

Which of the following is not O(n^2)? A. (15^10) * n + 12099 B. n^1.98 C. n^3 / (sqrt(n)) D. (2^20) * n

The order of growth of option c is n2.5 which is higher than n2.

int fun(int n) { int count = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) for (int j = i; j > 0; j--) count = count + 1; return count; } A. Theta (n) B. Theta (n^2) C. Theta (n*Logn) D. Theta (nLognLogn)

The time complexity can be calculated by counting number of times the expression "count = count + 1;" is executed. The expression is executed 0 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + .... + (n-1) times. Time complexity = Theta(0 + 1 + 2 + 3 + .. + n-1) = Theta (n*(n-1)/2) = Theta(n2)

What is recurrence for worst case of QuickSort and what is the time complexity in Worst case? A. Recurrence is T(n) = T(n-2) + O(n) and time complexity is O(n^2) B. Recurrence is T(n) = T(n-1) + O(n) and time complexity is O(n^2) C. Recurrence is T(n) = 2T(n/2) + O(n) and time complexity is O(nLogn) D. Recurrence is T(n) = T(n/10) + T(9n/10) + O(n) and time complexity is O(nLogn)

The worst case of QuickSort occurs when the picked pivot is always one of the corner elements in sorted array. In worst case, QuickSort recursively calls one subproblem with size 0 and other subproblem with size (n-1). So recurrence is T(n) = T(n-1) + T(0) + O(n) The above expression can be rewritten as T(n) = T(n-1) + O(n) void exchange(int *a, int *b) { int temp; temp = *a; *a = *b; *b = temp; } int partition(int arr[], int si, int ei) { int x = arr[ei]; int i = (si - 1); int j; for (j = si; j <= ei - 1; j++) { if(arr[j] <= x) { i++; exchange(&arr[i], &arr[j]); } } exchange (&arr[i + 1], &arr[ei]); return (i + 1); } /* Implementation of Quick Sort arr[] --> Array to be sorted si --> Starting index ei --> Ending index */ void quickSort(int arr[], int si, int ei) { int pi; /* Partitioning index */ if(si < ei) { pi = partition(arr, si, ei); quickSort(arr, si, pi - 1); quickSort(arr, pi + 1, ei); } } [/sourcecode]

Given an unsorted array. The array has this property that every element in array is at most k distance from its position in sorted array where k is a positive integer smaller than size of array. Which sorting algorithm can be easily modified for sorting this array and what is the obtainable time complexity? A. Insertion Sort with time complexity O(kn) B. Heap Sort with time complexity O(nLogk) C. Quick Sort with time complexity O(kLogk) D. Merge Sort with time complexity O(kLogk)

1) to sort the array firstly create a min-heap with first k+1 elements and a separate array as resultant array. 2) because elements are at most k distance apart from original position so, it is guranteed that the smallest element will be in this K+1 elements. 3) remove the smallest element from the min-heap(extract min) and put it in the result array. 4) Now,insert another element from the unsorted array into the mean-heap, now,the second smallest element will be in this, perform extract min and continue this process until no more elements are in the unsorted array.finally, use simple heap sort for the remaining elements Time Complexity ------------------------ 1) O(k) to build the initial min-heap 2) O((n-k)logk) for remaining elements... 3) 0(1) for extract min so overall O(k) + O((n-k)logk) + 0(1) = O(nlogk)

Let w(n) and A(n) denote respectively, the worst case and average case running time of an algorithm executed on an input of size n. which of the following is ALWAYS TRUE? A. A(n) = Ω (W(n)) B. A(n) = Θ (W(n)) C. A(n) = O (W(n)) D. A(n) = o (W(n))

C. C. A(n) = O (W(n))

The recurrence relation capturing the optimal time of the Tower of Hanoi problem with n discs is. A. T(n) = 2T(n - 2) + 2 B. T(n) = 2T(n - 1) + n C. T(n) = 2T(n/2) + 1 D. T(n) = 2T(n - 1) + 1

Following are the steps to follow to solve Tower of Hanoi problem recursively. Let the three pegs be A, B and C. The goal is to move n pegs from A to C. To move n discs from peg A to peg C: move n-1 discs from A to B. This leaves disc n alone on peg A move disc n from A to C move n?1 discs from B to C so they sit on disc n The recurrence function T(n) for time complexity of the above recursive solution can be written as following. T(n) = 2T(n-1) + 1

What is time complexity of fun()? int fun(int n) { int count = 0; for (int i = n; i > 0; i /= 2) for (int j = 0; j < i; j++) count += 1; return count; } A. O(n^2) B. O(nLogn) C. O(n) D. O(nLognLogn)

For a input integer n, the innermost statement of fun() is executed following times. n + n/2 + n/4 + ... 1 So time complexity T(n) can be written as T(n) = O(n + n/2 + n/4 + ... 1) = O(n) The value of count is also n + n/2 + n/4 + .. + 1

Suppose we have a O(n) time algorithm that finds median of an unsorted array. Now consider a QuickSort implementation where we first find median using the above algorithm, then use median as pivot. What will be the worst case time complexity of this modified QuickSort. A. O(n^2 Logn) B. O(n^2) C. O(n Logn Logn) D. O(nLogn)

If we use median as a pivot element, then the recurrence for all cases becomes T(n) = 2T(n/2) + O(n) The above recurrence can be solved using Master Method. It falls in case 2 of master method.

Which of the following is not true about comparison based sorting algorithms? A. The minimum possible time complexity of a comparison based sorting algorithm is O(nLogn) for a random input array B. Any comparison based sorting algorithm can be made stable by using position as a criteria when two elements are compared C. Counting Sort is not a comparison based sorting algortihm D. Heap Sort is not a comparison based sorting algorithm.

See http://www.geeksforgeeks.org/lower-bound-on-comparison-based-sorting-algorithms/ for point A. See http://www.geeksforgeeks.org/stability-in-sorting-algorithms/ for B. C is true, count sort is an Integer Sorting algorithm.

Which of the following is not true about comparison based sorting algorithms?The minimum possible time complexity of a comparison based sorting algorithm is O(nLogn) for a random input array Any comparison based sorting algorithm can be made stable by using position as a criteria when two elements are compared Counting Sort is not a comparison based sorting algortihm Heap Sort is not a comparison based sorting algorithm.

See http://www.geeksforgeeks.org/lower-bound-on-comparison-based-sorting-algorithms/ for point A. See http://www.geeksforgeeks.org/stability-in-sorting-algorithms/ for B. C is true, count sort is an Integer Sorting algorithm.

Which of the given options provides the increasing order of asymptotic complexity of functions f1, f2, f3 and f4? f1(n) = 2^n f2(n) = n^(3/2) f3(n) = nLogn f4(n) = n^(Logn) A. f3, f2, f4, f1 B. f3, f2, f1, f4 C. f2, f3, f1, f4 D. f2, f3, f4, f1

f1(n) = 2^n f2(n) = n^(3/2) f3(n) = nLogn f4(n) = n^(Logn) Except f3, all other are exponential. So f3 is definitely first in output. Among remaining, n^(3/2) is next. One way to compare f1 and f4 is to take Log of both functions. Order of growth of Log(f1(n)) is Θ(n) and order of growth of Log(f4(n)) is Θ(Logn * Logn). Since Θ(n) has higher growth than Θ(Logn * Logn), f1(n) grows faster than f4(n). Following is another way to compare f1 and f4. Let us compare f4 and f1. Let us take few values to compare n = 32, f1 = 2^32, f4 = 32^5 = 2^25 n = 64, f1 = 2^64, f4 = 64^6 = 2^36 ............... ............... Also see http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=2^n+vs+n^%28log+n%29 Thanks to fella26 for suggesting the above explanation.