Ch. 3: Introduction to the Fourth Amendment
Seizure of property
A seizure of property occurs when "there is some meaningful interference with an individual's possessory interest in that property" (United States v. Jacobsen, 466 US 109 [1984])
Open field
Any unoccupied or undeveloped real property falling outside the curtilage of a home (Oliver v. United States, 466 US 170 [1984], p. 170)
Reasonable suspicion
Justification that falls below probable cause but above a hunch. Reasonable suspicion is Court-created justification; it is not mentioned in the Fourth Amendment. Reasonable suspicion is necessary for police to engage in stop-and-frisk activities
Probable cause
More than bare suspicion; it exists when "the facts and circumstances within [the officers'] knowledge and of which they [have] reasonably trustworthy information [are] sufficient to warrant a prudent man in believing that the [suspect] had committed or was committing an offense" (Beck v. Ohio, 379 US 89 [1964], p. 91). In practical terms, more than 50 percent certainty. The comparable civil standard is preponderance of evidence
Seizure
One of two government actions (the other being searches) restricted by the Fourth Amendment. Seizures can be of persons or property
Reasonableness clause
The first part of the Fourth Amendment: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated..."
Warrant clause
The second part of the Fourth Amendment: "...and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath of affirmation, and particularity describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
Reasonableness
When evaluating questionable police action, it is first necessary to determine whether the Fourth Amendment applies. If it does, then we ask, "Did the police act in line with Fourth Amendment requirements?" This question is concerned with the reasonableness of the action in question
Seizure of a person
A seizure of a person occurs when a police officer-by means of physical force or show of authority-intentionally restrains an individual's liberty in such a manner that a reasonable person would believe that he or she is not free to leave (Terry v. Ohio, 392 US 1 [1968]; United States v. Mendenhall, 466 US 544 [1980])
Administrative justification
A standard used to support certain regulatory and special needs searches. Created by the Supreme Court, it adopts a balancing approach, weighing the privacy interests of individuals with the interests of society in preserving public safety
Government action
Action on the part of paid government officials, usually police officers. Government action is one of the two requirements (the other being infringement on one's reasonable expectation of privacy) that must be in place for a Fourth Amendment search to occur
Justification
Also know as cause, justification is necessary for the police to engage in actions that trigger the Fourth Amendment. Examples of justification include probable cause and reasonable suspicion
Reasonable expectation of privacy
An expectation of privacy that society (through the eyes of the judge) is prepared to accept as reasonable. For a search to occur, a reasonable expectation of privacy must be infringed upon a government actor
Search
For Fourth Amendment purposes, a government action that infringes on one's reasonable expectation of privacy
