Child Psychology Test 3
Retaliatory aggression
Aggressive acts elicited by real or imagined provocations
Average
All in middle
Conflict
Circumstances in which two or more persons have incompatible needs, desires, or goals Ex: as kids mature
Work with parents
Parenting skills; being more warm, accepting, and positive with children; ignore negative behaviors; how to do time out the right way
Internalizing symptoms
Suicide, depression
Sociometric status classification
Take date and turn it into categories to put kids in
Poverty
More likely to be aggressive
Parental conflict
More parents fight; kids model what their parents do
Interprets the available cues
What is their reaction and did they mean to do it?
Peer perceived popularity
Who kids think are liked
Morrow (aggression)
5th graders fill out short measure asking if they were bullied today, and how they felt today, as well as got standardized test scores from district; took scores every day for 10 days; found out how much kids were bullied was related to academic achievement and it upset some kids more than others to be bullied; also found that the more children were upset about being bullied, the worst they did on their test scores
Huesmann
600 people, 8 to 30 years old, how many criminal convictions; at age 8 the kids considered to have high aggression were more likely to have a criminal conviction by the age of 30
How many percent of bullying happens with bystanders watching?
85 percent
Sociability
A person's willingness to engage others in social interaction and to seek their attention or approval
Reactive aggression
Act of aggression through a response back to something
Externalizing symptoms
Acting out
Relational aggression
Acts such as snubbing, exclusion, withdrawing acceptance, or spreading rumors that are aimed at damaging an adversary's self-esteem, friendships, or social status
Instrumental aggression
Aggressive acts for which the perpetrator's major goal is to gain access to objects, space, or privileges Ex: young kids- toys and candy
Hostile aggression
Aggressive acts for which the perpetrator's major goal is to harm or injure a victim
Punishment
Any response that decreases the likelihood that a behavior will happen again
Reinforcement
Any response that increases the likelihood a behavior will happen again
Physical correlates
Attractiveness, boys in late puberty, girls and early puberty, race, and ethnicity
Aggression
Behavior with the intent to hurt someone
Earhight
Bystanders; 79 fourth and fifth grade kids; assessed how much they were willing to engage when they are a bystander; used peer nomination (who tries to stop bullying?); had kids watch videos, and after each video, self report questions of negative emotions felt from video, and she collected physiological measures while they were watching the videos; divided kids into an emotional and unemotional group
Who should we focus on i we want to decrease bullying?
Bystanders; support the victim, rather than support the bully; getting adults involved, etc.
Peer rejection
Child is disliked by most of the other kids in their peer group
Criminal correlates of aggression
Childhood reactive aggression to adult spouse and child abuse; childhood proactive aggression to adult criminal behavior
What does peer rejection in childhood put kids at risk for?
Externalizing symptoms; particular for rejected aggression; more likely for substance abuse, drop out of school, pregnancy, delinquency
KiVa in Delaware
First in US; 95 classrooms in 12 elementary schools; randomized them; 4th and 5th grade; 1885 kids; ethnically diverse, both boys and girls; collected data at beginning and end of school year (anti bullying attitudes, empathy for victims, self efficacy to support victims, bystander behaviors); got some changes
Time out technique
Form of discipline in which children who misbehave are removed from the setting until they are prepared to act more appropriately
Kenneth Dodge
Formulated a social information processing model that seeks to explain how children come to favor aggressive or nonaggressive solutions to social problems; proposes that a child's response will depend on the outcome of 6 cognitive steps (encode, interpret, formulate goal, generates, evaluates, enacts response)
Work with children
Friendship groups and academic tutoring
Relational and social aggression
Gossiping, exclusion, rumors; girls and boys of all ages engage in the same amount; kids who other kids think are popular are more likely to spread rumors
Work with teachers
Help teachers learn how to manage kids better in their classroom
Controversial children
High impact, in the middle preference; children who have received many nominations as liked and many nominations as disliked
Social-cognitive correlates
Hostile attributional biases, and positive outcome expectations for aggression
Social impact
How many people noticed you at all
Patterson
Identified a lot of aggressive kids, went to homes, and did lots of naturalistic observation; coercive home environments; pattern happens a lot more in homes of aggressive children; person who gets what they want is positively reinforced and the person who gave them what they want was negatively reinforced
Combined intervention
Identified kids in kindergarten; teacher ratings on aggressivness and peer nominations; experimental group with intervention and control group without intervention; did random assignment by school; 3 years; collected parent, teacher, self, peer, and observational data; 6th grade did not have differences, but the results came back in 9th and 12th grade
Expectations of peer rejection
If you give rejected kids the projection that other kids like them, they will be more prosocial and other kids will like them more
KiVa program
In Finland, found that increased self reports of empathy towards victims and peer reports of bystander supporting behavior in the school that got the programs; also found that peer reports of reinforcing or assisting behavior decreased in the schools that got the program; led to significant reductions in self- reports of bullying and self-reports and peer-reports of victimization
FAST Track
Intervention program; how can we identify the kids at risk earlier and get them off the pathway?
Physical health problems
Kids who are physically victimized have more stress response hormones, which leads to physical health problems; Bookhout
What was Zakriski's findings?`
Kids who are rejected and aggressive are not accurate with who likes them and doesn't like them, but accurate when looking at other kids and seeing they don't like each other
Emergence of peer rejection in new groups
Kids who are rejected in one group tend to become rejected in another; 3 hours
Victims
Kids who are victimized have more trouble than other kids; serious mental health and academic outcomes
What were Earhight's findings?
Kids who were in the emotional group, were more likely to have been peer nominated for who stands up to bullies
Why are peer relations important?
Learn more about diversity, learn how to work things out, what kids learn about emotion regulation
Popular children
Liked a lot and disliked by hardly anyone
Bookhout
Looked at BMI measures and self report measure of weight related victimization; 924 children; had measures of negative body cognitions; teachers gave measures of depression and anxiety; found you could draw a pathway between BMI to weight related victimization, from weight related victimization to negative body cognitions, and from negative body cognitions to depression and anxiety
Physical and verbal aggression
Males are more; both biological and social explanations
Neglected
Middle on social preference, but low impact; children who receive few nominations as either a liked or disliked individual from members of their peer group
What were Morrow's findings?
More aggressive, the more inaccurate for themselves (over estimated how many like them and under estimated how many don't like them) More depressed, the more inaccurate (over estimated how many don't like them and underestimated how many do like them)
Behavioral correlates
Neglected are usually quiet kids
Does positive and negative mean good and bad?
No
Incompatible response technique
Non-punitive method of behavior or modification in which adults ignore undesirable conduct while reinforcing acts that are incompatible with these responses
Unemotional group
Not a lot of negative emotions and did not become physiologically aroused
LL
Number of peers who nominated the child as like least
LM
Number of peers who nominated the child as liked most
Work with peers
Once a week, pull out a kid from classroom, but with a different peer each time; once we made some progress with kids' behaviors, we can get other kids to notice they are okay to hang out with
Emotionally unavailable parents
Parenting that reflects a withdrawing from the child and is characterized by cold, unsupportive, and even indifferent, disinterested, or neglectful parenting
Bystanders
Part of what drives kids to intervene is empathy
Coercive home environments
Patterson; One person in family wants another to do something, they pester, until another finally gives in to do what they want
Positive outcome expectation for aggression
Person will act in a certain way because they are motivated to select a behavior over others due to what they expect the result of that selected behavior to be
Generates
Possible strategies for achieving goal
Origins of aggression
Poverty, parental conflict, coercive home environments
Bullies
Proactive aggression
Proactive aggression
Purposeful behavior a child engages in to get something that they want
Friendship groups
Put kids together in groups of 6, and work on different types of skills; emotion understanding and emotion regulation
Emotional and physiological correlates of aggression
Reactive aggression in connected to anger and physiological arousal; proactive aggression is connected to be unemotional and physiologically unaroused
Psychopathology correlates of aggression
Reactive aggression is related to depression and anxiety; proactive aggression seems to lead to more behaviors that are psychopathic
Awareness of peer rejection
Rejected non aggressive kids are very aware, but aggressive are not aware
Crick and Underwood
Relational or social aggression; if we only think about physical and verbal aggression, we might miss other behaviors girls do more
Emotional group
Reported a lot of negative emotions and became physiologically aroused
Formulates a goal
Resolve a solution
Positive
Response involves giving something
Negative
Response involves taking something away
Provocative victims of aggression
Restless, hot tempered, and oppositional children who are victimized because they often irritate their peers
2 equations
SP=LM-LL SI=LM+LL
Morrow
Same thing as Zakriski; then related that accuracy to kids' level of aggression and depression
Social-cognitive correlates of aggression
Smithmir; reactive aggression did not connect to anything
Popularity
Social construction by kids, with popular children being well known and accepted by other children, and having high status attributes such as attractiveness, athleticism, and desirable posessions
SI
Social impact
SP
Social preference
Smithmir
Social-cognitive correlates of aggression; collected data of incarcerated boys; staff who worked in facility rated boys on the two types of aggression
Passive victims of aggression
Socially withdrawn, anxious children with low self esteem who bullies torment, even though they appear to have done little to trigger such abuse
Finland
Teachers get 2 hour built into their day of prep time, highly educated and well paid, more valued, and get more support
Hostile attributional biases
Tendency to interpret others' behaviors as having hostile intent, even when the behavior is ambiguous or benign; characterizes reactive aggressors
Evaluates
The likely effectiveness of strategies and select a response
Why do kids bully?
To gain power and status in a peer group
Negative body cognitions
To what extent do you have negative thoughts about your body
Peers
Two or more persons who are operating at similar levels of behavioral complexity
Emotional correlates
Understanding emotion and emotion expression and regulation
Stability of aggression
Very stable
Sociometric popularity
Who kids like
Academic tutoring
Work with them academically to keep them on track; don't have to go to a separate classroom
Zakriski
2 parts; kids say who they do and don't like and showed kids a video of one kid not liking another and asking kids if they liked each other
Sociometric Methodology
Coie; Ask privately who kids like and don't like
Rejected children
Disliked by a lot of people and liked by few
Stability of peer rejection
Emergence of peer rejection in new groups, expectations of peer rejection