Law - Question Bank
Arthur worked for Lady Grey and part of his job was to buy plants, ornaments and furniture for the gardens of her country manor house. When her son, Harry, was due to retire from the services, she advised Arthur that Harry would be taking on his responsibilities. A few weeks later, Arthur ordered some very expensive roses and marble statues from Lady Grey's main supplier and collected the goods the next day for his own garden. The invoice was delivered to Lady Grey. Is there an agency relationship between Arthur and Lady Grey in respect of the contract for the roses and statues? A. Yes B. No Is Lady Grey bound to settle the invoice? C. Yes D. No
A C Chapter 3 - Q1
Ashley is Phyllis's agent and enters into a contract for the purchase of a vintage car from Vince, as instructed by Phyllis. Vince does not know that Ashley is buying the car for Phyllis, at the time of entering into the contract, but discovers this to be the case one week later. If Vince then defaults on the sale, can Phyllis take action on the contract? A. Yes B. No If Phyllis defaults on the purchase, can Vince take action on the contract? C. Yes D. No
A C Chapter 3 - Q16
Walter enters into a contract for the purchase of a barge from Barney. He is actually buying it for Natalie, although Barney does not know that Walter is buying it for anybody else (not that it would have made any difference to him). When the date for payment arrives, Walter is unable to pay for the barge and tells Barney that he was actually buying it for Natalie anyway. Is the contract enforceable against Natalie? A. Yes B. No Is the contract enforceable against Walter? C. Yes D. No
A C Chapter 3 - Q17
A valid agency relationship can be created by: Express appointment A. Yes B. No Ratification A. Yes B. No
A C Chapter 3 - Q19
An agent's authority to act on behalf of their principal can arise: Where express authority is explicitly granted by the principal to the agent A. Yes B. No Where a person with actual authority makes a representation to a third party that a particular person has the authority to act as their agent without actually appointing the agent C. Yes D. No
A C Chapter 3 - Q21
Roz works in the accounts department of Bizzy Lizzy, a successful florist's business. The principal owner of the business, Vincent, was due to visit a specialist rose grower on the Isles of Scilly but was unable to go due to illness. Vincent asked Roz to go along instead. He telephoned the rose grower to say that his buying partner would be taking his place. Roz ordered 500 roses for Bizzy Lizzy. Which of the following best describes the legal position? A. Roz had ostensible authority to order the roses. B. Roz had implied authority to order the roses. C. Roz had express authority to order the roses. D. Roz had no authority to order the roses.
A Chapter 3 - Q14
Dennis was a partner in Doolittle Solicitors. He retires from the partnership and the firm's existing clients and suppliers are informed of this fact; the firm amends its stationery so that Dennis's name no longer appears on it. A short time later, Dennis orders goods using old stationery which still has his name and asks for the bill to be sent to Doolittle Solicitors. Which of the following statements is correct? A. There is a binding contract between Dennis and the firm which supplied the goods. B. No binding contract has been created between the supplier and Doolittle Solicitors because Dennis was not authorised to act on behalf of the firm. C. There is a binding contract between Doolittle Solicitors and the firm which supplied the goods. D. No binding contract has been created because the partnership shown on the stationery had ceased to exist.
A Chapter 3 - Q20
Barnaby is a partner in Brown & Co, a dentists' practice. He orders four filing cabinets, one for reception and one for each of the surgeries, from Office Gear. The other two dentists in the practice think that this is an unnecessary expense and ask Office Gear to cancel the order. Office Gear is not prepared to do so and demands payment. Which of the following best describes the legal position as to whether or not Brown & Co is bound by the contract? A. It is bound because the contract is within the implied usual authority of the dentist, Barnaby. B. It is bound because Office Gear knew that Barnaby was buying the cabinets for Brown & Co. C. It is not bound because Barnaby had authority to buy dentistry tools and equipment but not office supplies. D. It is not bound because the majority of partners do not wish to buy the cabinets.
A Chapter 3 - Q9
Are the following statements true or false in connection with agency by estoppel? The third party must show that they have relied on a representation that the contracting party was acting as agent for their principal. A. True B. False It is not necessary to show that the claimant's loss was cause by their reliance on the representation. C. True D. False
A D Chapter 3 - Q12
Annabel is Phil's agent. She enters into a contract with Tim, within her authority, expressly describing herself as an agent for Phil. Can Annabel be liable on this contract with Tim? A. Yes B. No If Annabel enters into a contract, saying that she is acting as agent but without actually naming Phil as her principal, does that mean that Phil not be liable on the contract? C. Yes D. No
A D Chapter 3 - Q15
Andrea purchases 10 watercolour painting from an artist, Ross, for her employer, the Earl of Somerset, even though he has told her not to buy any more watercolours on his behalf but to concentrate on pastels. When the artist learns this, he demands their return as he had no wish for his work to hang in Andrea's terraced home in Bridgwater. However, the Earl of Somerset had come to like them after seeing them on Andrea's walls and refused the artist's demand for their return, sending him a cheque instead. Does the Earl of Somerset's action amount to ratification of the contract? A. Yes B. No Is the artist able to insist on the return of the watercolour paintings? C. Yes D. No
A D Chapter 3 - Q4
Brenda writes to Carol on 1 January offering to sell her gold necklace for £100. Carol receives the letter on 3 January and on 5 January posts a letter accepting Brenda's offer and sends a cheque for £100. In the meantime, however, Brenda has sold the necklace to her sister Daisy for £150 believing that Carol wasn't interested. She wrote to Carol telling her this on 4 January but the letter wasn't received by Carol until 6 January. Brenda received Carol's cheque on 7 January. Which of the following is true? A. Carol's acceptance is effective on 5 January B. Brenda's offer is revoked on 4 January C. Carol's acceptance is effective on 7 January D. There is no binding agreement between Brenda and Carol
A. Carol's acceptance is effective on 5 January Chapter 1 - Q20
Which of the following statements is incorrect? A. If the defendant succeeds in arguing res ipsa loquitur, the burden of proof is then on the claimant to show negligence B. In arguing res ipsa loquitur, it must be shown that the thing that caused the damage was under the management and control of the defendant C. Res ipsa loquitur is relevant where the reason for the damage is not known D. Whether a breach of the duty of care has occurred is a matter of fact
A. If the defendant succeeds in arguing res ipsa loquitur, the burden of proof is then on the claimant to show negligence Chapter 4 - Q4
Which of the following statements correctly describes privity of contract? A. Individuals and businesses only have rights and obligations under a contract if they are a party to it B. To be valid, contracts must contain agreement, consideration and intention to create legal relations C. Consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate D. Contractual terms are a private matter to be decided by the contracting parties
A. Individuals and businesses only have rights and obligations under a contract if they are a party to it Chapter 1 - Q39
Michael offers to sell his Laser 2000 sailing dinghy to Rupert for £1,500 , provided he gets the job for which he has just been interviewed, since that would result in him having to live somewhere too far from sailing facilities. Rupert is delighted and thinks £1,500 is an excellent price. Michael fails to get the job. What is the consequence of Michael failing to get the job? A. The offer is terminated B. The contract is rendered voidable C. The contract is rendered unconditional D. The contract is rendered unenforceable
A. The offer is terminated Chapter 1 - Q8
Malcolm is managing director of Eastreach Ltd. Knowing that the finance director, Finley, was undergoing cancer treatment, Malcolm asked Tristan, an accountant, to prepare the company's accounts. Tristan provided the accounts in draft and Malcolm asked Finley to check that he was happy with them. While awaiting Finley's review, George, Tristan's brother (and business rival), saw the draft accounts and bought the entire 51% shareholding in Eastreach Ltd owned by Brigitte. When Finley had finished checking the accounts, it was discovered that Tristan had made significant accounting errors and had shown the company to be significantly more profitable than it was: in fact the company was heading for insolvency. Brigitte is delighted but George sues Tristan for his negligence, noting that Tristan had not made any disclaimer of liability in respect of his work. Which of the following statements is incorrect? A. Tristan owe
A. Tristan owed a duty of care because George was known to him Chapter 4 - Q13
With regard to terms being implied into contracts, are the following true or false? The courts will imply a terms into a contract if required to do so by statute. A. True B. False Terms may be implied on the basis of a custom or practice of a particular trade. C. True D. False
A. True C. True Chapter 1 - Q29
On Monday, Andrew advertised his car for sale for £5,000 in a local newspaper. Brian saw the advertisement and telephoned Andrew offering him £4,500 for the car. Andrew eventually offered to sell the car to Brian for £4,800. Brian replied that he would need to test-drive the car before he could agree such a price. Brian then agreed a time to meet at Andrew's house the following weekend for the test drive. On Friday, Andrew sold his car to his neighbour Carol for £4,500. Are the following statements true or false? Andrew's advertisement in the newspaper is purely an invitation to treat and as such is incapable of acceptance and forming a legally binding contract. A. True B. False Brian has no right of action against Andrew because no acceptance took place. C. True D. False
A. True C. True Chapter 1 - Q32
Are the following statements true or false? Where the offeror prescribes a mode of communication of acceptance, the offeree can normally use an alternative mode, provided it is at least as expeditious as the mode prescribed. A. True B. False Where no mode of communication of acceptance is prescribed, the offeree should use the same mode as that used for the offer. C. True D. False
A. True D. False Chapter 1 - Q18
Are the following statements true or false? There is a rebuttable presumption that social, domestic and family arrangements are not intended to be legally binding. A. True B. False There is an irrebuttable presumption that parties to a commercial arrangement intend it to be legally binding C. True D. False
A. True D. False Chapter 1 - Q23
Are the following statements true or false? Anticipatory breach may be implied from conduct and need not be explicit. A. True B. False Where an innocent party elects to treat a contract as discharged, they waive the right to claim damages from the party in default. C. True D. False
A. True D. False Chapter 2 - Q3
Are the following statements true or false? Acceptance may be express or inferred from conduct. A. True B. False Acceptance must always be communicated to the offeror in order for it to be effective. C. True D. False
A. True D. No Chapter 1 - Q15
With regard to the terms of a contract, answer the following: Where a contract is in writing, will the courts allow the parties to rely on any terms that are agreed between them but not embodied in the written document? A. Yes B. No Can a term implied by custom and practice be overridden by a written term? C. Yes D. No
A. Yes C. Yes Chapter 1 - Q21
Can the following constitute valid consideration? The payment of £1 per year as rent for a house A. Yes B. No A promise by Adam not to pursue his action for breach of contract against Ben, if Ben agrees to do Adam's accounts for him for 12 months without charge C. Yes D. No
A. Yes C. Yes Chapter 1 - Q25
A contractual offer may be terminated by: Rejection A. Yes B. No Lapse of time C. Yes D. No
A. Yes C. Yes Chapter 1 - Q35
With regard to factors that need to be taken into account by the court when determining whether a duty of care exists in cases of professional misstatement: Is the purpose for which the statement was made relevant to the court? A. Yes B. No Will the court consider whether it is just and equitable to impose a duty of care? C. Yes D. No
A. Yes C. Yes Chapter 4 - Q18
Some situations will cause a contract to be discharged by frustration. A manor house which was hired for a wedding reception is destroyed by fire a week before the wedding. Is this contract discharged by frustration? A. Yes B. No A boat supplier in England has a contract to supply boats to a foreign country. However, due to tensions between the nations, the contract has become subject to a number of onerous legal requirements that make it difficult, but not impossible, to perform the contract. Is this contract discharged by frustration? C. Yes D. No
A. Yes D. No Chapter 2 - Q16
Tim, an accountant, prepares financial statements for MarkUp plc, knowing that the company was considering three takeover bids, including one from Growth plc. There was no disclaimer of liability in the accounts. In the event that Tim prepares the statements negligently, indicating that the company is financially secure when it is not, and Growth plc takes over MarkUp plc on the basis of those accounts: Can Growth plc recover any resulting losses it makes on the takeover? A. Yes B. No Will Tim be liable to pay damages to the other takeover bidders where they were also identified to him as potential takeover bidders who would be relying on the accounts? C. Yes D. No
A. Yes D. No Chapter 4 - Q15
Zak owes Eve £100. Finding that he has insufficient cash, Zak offers Eve his bicycle worth £90 instead. Eve accepts. Which of the following statements best describes the legal position as to whether there is valid consideration? A. Yes, Eve was not already entitled to the bicycle so it is sufficient consideration for waiver of the debt B. No, he bicycle is not sufficient as it does not match or exceed the value of the debt C. No, consideration must be in money or money's worth D. Yes, a bicycle constitutes sufficient consideration because it has an identifiable value
A. Yes, Eve was not already entitled to the bicycle so it is sufficient consideration for waiver of the debt Chapter 1 - Q27
On 1 February, Harry posts a letter to Beth offering to sell his car. On 2 February, Beth receives Harry's letter. On 3 February, Harry changes his mind and posts a letter to Beth telling her that the car is no longer for sale. On the same day, Beth posts a letter to Harry accepting the offer contained in his letter of 1 February. On 4 February, Beth receives Harry's letter informing her that the car is no longer for sale. Is there a valid contract between Beth and Harry regarding the sale of Harry's car? A. Yes, acceptance took place on 3 February and Harry's revocation took place on 4 February B. No, Harry revoked the offer before Beth posted her acceptance C. Yes, Harry cannot revoke the offer once it has been communicated to Beth D. No, Harry's revocation took place on 3 February so Beth's acceptance is too late
A. Yes, acceptance took place on 3 February and Harry's revocation took place on 4 February Chapter 1 - Q34
Foul Foods Ltd, a company specialising in the production and sale of cream cakes on an industrial scale, bought a large oven from Ovens & Co intending to extend their existing business to include the production of pizza bases. The delivery of the oven was three months later than the contract date. During those three months Foul Foods Ltd tried unsuccessfully to buy another oven. Foul Foods Ltd has claimed for its lost profits in the following two ways: 1) Profits which would have been made from the expected increase in business following their increased capacity; and 2) Profits which they would have made from a lucrative contract for the supply of pizza bases to a nationwide supermarket chain for which they would have been able to bid. Is Foul Foods Ltd's claim for its lost profits likely to be successful? A. Yes, but only the lost profits from the expected general increase in trade are recoverable, not those from th
A. Yes, but only the lost profits from the expected general increase in trade are recoverable, not those from the loss of the lucrative supermarket contract Chapter 2 - Q13
Are the following statements true or false? For an agency by estoppel to arise, there must be a pre-existing agency relationship between the principal and the agent. A. True B. False When an individual revokes the authority of their agent they should inform the third parties, who regularly deal with the agent, of the change in circumstances in order to prevent the former agent having any continuing authority to act on their behalf. C. True D. False
B C Chapter 3 - Q13
Martha tells John that she wants to buy one of his horse sculptures on behalf of her grandmother, Lady Reynolds. In fact, Lady Reynolds has not asked her to do so. Three months later, John contacts Lady Reynolds to say that he has completed a bronze stallion and it is ready for collection on the payment of £10,000. Lady Reynolds denies all knowledge of it and refuses to pay. Can John sue Lady Reynolds on the contract? A. Yes B. No Can John sue Martha under the tort of deceit? C. Yes D. No
B C Chapter 3 - Q18
Are the following statements regarding agency law true or false? The duties of an agent are limited to what was agreed and incorporated into the agency contract between agent and the principal. A. True B. False An agent and their principal have a fiduciary relationship between them. C. True D. False
B C Chapter 3 - Q24
Are the following statements true or false? On ratification of an agent's contract by a principal, the third party may then choose whether to enforce the contract against the agent or the principal. A. True B. False Ratification can only validate an agent's past acts and will not endow any future authority. C. True D. False
B C Chapter 3 - Q5
Brian has just terminated his appointment of Livvi, who has been his agent for the past six months. The written contract of agency did not mention anything about remuneration and Brian relies on this when he refuses to pay her in respect of her services. He does, however, accept that he must reimburse her for £5,000 expenses that she has paid along the way. Can Brian rely on the written contract to claim that no remuneration is payable to Livvi? A. Yes B. No Is Livvi entitled to retain the goods belonging to Brian that she has in her possession until he pays her the sums owed to her? C. Yes D. No
B C Chapter 3 - Q8
Alice, acting as Petra's agent, contracts with Toni to purchase Toni's car. Under agency law, who may sue and be sued on the contract? A. Alice and Toni B. Petra and Toni C. Alice and Petra D. Alice, Toni and Petra
B Chapter 3 - Q23
Frank acts as an agent for Marilyn, purchasing silk nightwear from a number of different suppliers. Sometimes the suppliers pay a commission on orders placed with them by Frank on behalf of Marilyn. Frank regards the commissions as a perk of the job and keeps them. Which of the following best describes the legal position? A. The commissions are regarded as bribes and Marilyn should report Frank to the police. B. Marilyn may dismiss Frank and recover the amount of commissions retained by him. C. Commissions are customarily retained by an agent as part of his remuneration and so Frank has no liability in respect of them. D. Marilyn can take action against the suppliers for directing the commissions to Frank instead of her.
B Chapter 3 - Q6
Preparing for her 40th birthday party, Scarlett went into Choice Wines and ordered three cases of pinot noir, saying that she was buying them in her capacity as agent for Dame Hilda, a well-known celebrity who lived in the same village and who was planning a summer ball in the grounds of her country house. Choice Wines supplied the wine and then invoiced Dame Hilda. Is there an agency by holding out or estoppel? A. Yes B. No Can Choice Wines demand payment from Dame Hilda? C. Yes D. No
B D Chapter 3 - Q3
With regard to the duties owed by an agent: Is an agent entitled to delegate the tasks that they are appointed to undertake, as they see fit? A. Yes B. No Is an agent at liberty to reveal details about their principal discovered during the course of the agency relationship, once that relationship has ended? C. Yes D. No
B D Chapter 3 - Q7
Raheem is visiting Karl's office. Whilst he is there he sees a photocopier that Karl no longer needs. Raheem offers Karl £500 for the photocopier and Karl accepts. Raheem pays Karl, loads the photocopier into his van and drives away. Which type of consideration is present in the contract between Raheem and Karl? A. Past B. Executed C. Executive D. Executory
B. Executed Chapter 1 - Q38
Are the following statements true or false? An acceptance of a contractual offer sent by email takes effect as soon as the person accepting the offer presses the 'send' key. A. True B. False Whether or not postal acceptance is within the contemplation of the parties is a question of face and may be deduced from all the circumstances. C. True D. False
B. False C. True Chapter 1 - Q17
In relation to the intention to create legal relations: The parties to social or domestic agreement are presumed to have intended the agreement to be legally enforceable, although this intention is rebuttable. A. True B. False The parties to a commercial agreement are presumed to have intended the arrangement to be legally enforceable. C. True D. False
B. False C. True Chapter 1 - Q31
Are the following statements true or false? To be effective, a revocation of an offer must be made in writing. A. True B. False To be effective, a revocation can be made by an authorised agent of the offeror. C. True D. False
B. False C. True Chapter 1 - Q37
Are the following statements true or false? If an offer states that it will remain open for three months, the offeror cannot revoke it before three months have passed. A. True B. False A letter of revocation is effective when posted. C. True D. False
B. False D. False Chapter 1 - Q12
The equitable remedy of specific performance can be awarded in cases involving: The performance of personal services A. True B. False A contract to build a house C. True D. False
B. False D. False Chapter 2 - Q14
Are the following statements true or false? Under contract law, parties to a contract are required to substantially perform their obligations. This is sufficient to prevent the other party from seeking redress if they are not happy with their performance. A. True B. False Breach of contract occurs in all cases where one party to a contract fails to perform their contractual obligations. C. True D. False
B. False D. False Chapter 2 - Q18
Are the following statements true or false? Damages for breach of contract are primarily intended to restore the injured party to the same position they were in at the time when the contract was made. A. True B. False The claimant is required to take every opportunity to mitigate their loss arising as a consequence of a breach of contract. C. True D. False
B. False D. False Chapter 2 - Q5
Are the following statements true or false? An auditor who is responsible for an auditor's report containing materially false or misleading information commits an offence under the Companies Act 2006 that is punishable by a fine and/or imprisonment. A. True B. False A liability limitation agreement between a company and its auditor limiting potential liability for negligence in the course of auditing accounts is automatically void. C. True D. False
B. False D. False Chapter 4 - Q16
James contracted to buy a rare sports car from Jeremy for £23,000 but refused to take delivery as agreed. Jeremy, who had recently bought the car for £20,000, was able to sell the car to Richard for £24,100, but sued James for breach of their contract. Which of the following best describes the legal position? A. Jeremy is entitled to recover £23,000 from James, that being the agreed contract price and there being no excuse for James' breach B. Jeremy is entitled to nominal damages only since he has been able to sell the car for greater profit C. Jeremy is entitled only to recover from James the £20,000 that he had in fact paid for the car himself since he was able to sell the car on for profit following the breach by James D. James is no longer in breach of contract because Jeremy has mitigated his loss totally
B. Jeremy is entitled to nominal damages only since he has been able to sell the car for greater profit Chapter 2 - Q7
Mark emails Nathan and offers to sell his tandem to him for £250. Nathan texts him back to say that he'd love it but he will only pay £230. Two days later Mark says he'll accept £230 but Nathan has bought one on eBay for £200. Which of the following best describes the legal position between the parties? A. Nathan's reply is a rejection of Mark's offer B. Nathan's reply is a counter offer which Mark accepts C. Nathan's reply is merely a request for information as to whether Mark will accept £20 less D. Nathan's reply constitutes a counter offer but this is revoked when he buys a tandem from eBay
B. Nathan's reply is a counter offer which Mark accepts Chapter 1 - Q11
To be valid, a contract must contain: Written evidence of the principal terms of the contract A. Yes B. No An agreement C. Yes D. No
B. No C. Yes Chapter 1 - Q36
In respect of a successful action in the tort of negligence: Is it true that the claimant must have suffered personal injury? A. Yes B. No Is the standard of proof the balance of probabilities? C. Yes D. No
B. No C. Yes Chapter 4 - Q1
With regard to an auditor's potential liability in tort for providing audited accounts: Is a provision (other than in a liability limitation agreement) that excludes them from such liability enforceable? A. Yes B. No Can the company agree to indemnify an auditor against such liability? C. Yes D. No
B. No C. Yes Chapter 4 - Q17
In an action for negligence: Does there need to be some sort of pre-existing relationship between the claimant and defendant at the time of the act complained of, although not necessarily a contractual relationship? A. Yes B. No Does the court need to be satisfied that public policy would allow a duty of care to exist? C. Yes D. No
B. No C. Yes Chapter 4 - Q2
On 28 May, Abigail writes to Gill and offers to sell her all her old accountancy study manuals for £50. Gill posts a letter together with a cheque for £50 on 1 June saying that she'll pick them up on 3 June. However on 2 June, Abigail discovers that she has failed two of her papers and so sends a letter to Gill saying that the books are no longer for sale. On 3 June, each receives the other's letter. Does the letter of revocation take effect on 2 June? A. Yes B. No Does Gill's acceptance take effect on 3 June? C. Yes D. No
B. No D. No Chapter 1 - Q14
On 1 May, Hugh offered to sell his boat to Jeff for £5,000 , stating that his offer had to be accepted by notice in writing. Jeff posted a letter of acceptance on 3 May, but it never arrived. Does the postal rule apply ie, is the acceptance effective as soon as it is posted? A. Yes B. No Is there a contract between Hugh and Jeff? C. Yes D. No
B. No D. No Chapter 1 - Q19
Clarence sells champagne and high quality wines from home. He delivers a glossy flyer to all the £1 million plus homes in the Clifton area of Bristol, offering a 1998 Chablis for £30 a bottle. On reading his copy of the flyer, Kenton goes to Clarence's home and asks for a case of Chablis. Is the flyer issued by Clarence a valid offer? A. Yes B. No Is Clarence in breach of contract if he says to Kenton that the Chablis is out of stock and that he is unable to get hold of any more? C. Yes D. No
B. No D. No Chapter 1 - Q5
The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 renders some exclusions void and other subject to the reasonableness test: In a contract between two businesses, is a clause which limits liability for losses due to negligence void, however reasonable it might appear? A. Yes B. No Is a clause limiting liability for personal injury resulting from negligence in a contract between two private individuals subject to the reasonableness test? C. Yes D. No
B. No D. No Chapter 2 - Q11
Natasha holds all relevant qualifications in horse and stable management. She runs a stable yard and has a team of college students to help at the yard, including transferring horses from the stables to the field and vice versa. One day, Becky, a student, went to collect a horse and was kicked in the head. She suffered serious injury. Shortly after this incident, a similar incident happened at the yard of a top showjumper. Reacting to this later incident, the Horse Society issued a direction that all yard owners should ensure that their grooms and helpers always wear suitable headgear when turning out or catching horses. After reading this, Becky's parents decide to sue Natasha for negligence. In the context of negligence: Is the Horse Society guidance relevant to the standard of care owed by Natasha? A. Yes B. No Is the standard of care owed by Natasha that of an ordinary reasonable man guided by those consideration
B. No D. No Chapter 4 - Q8
On Monday, George offers to sell his piano to Hilda for £1,500 , to be delivered on Thursday. On Tuesday, Hilda replies, saying that she will only buy the piano if George will delay the delivery until the following Monday. George doesn't reply but sells his piano to Ivy on Thursday. On Friday, Hilda sees George and accepts his offer. Is there a binding contract between George and Hilda? A. Yes, Hilda's reply on Tuesday constitutes an acceptance of the offer B. No, Hilda's reply on Tuesday constitutes a counter offer which destroys the original offer C. No, the offer is terminated when George sells the piano to Ivy on Thursday D. Yes, Hilda's reply on Tuesday is a request for information only and on Friday she accepts his offer
B. No, Hilda's reply on Tuesday constitutes a counter offer which destroys the original offer Chapter 1 - Q9
Tina, a trainee accountant, was approached by Kevin, the husband of Tina's senior colleague, Jill, at an office party. Kevin asked her for some professional advice. Flattered that he had asked her rather than Jill, Tina obliged. However, her advice was flawed. Is she liable for the resulting loss suffered by Kevin? A. No, because she is only a trainee B. No, because the advice was not given in a professional context C. Yes, because she knows him and assumes responsibility for her advice D. Yes, because she owes a duty of care for which the standard is that of a reasonable qualified accountant
B. No, because the advice was not given in a professional context Chapter 4 - Q14
In which of the following scenarios is there insufficient consideration for a waiver of rights by Oscar where Humphrey owes him £1,000 to be paid on 13 May? A. Oscar agrees to accept a car instead B. Oscar agrees to accept £980 on 13 May in cash C. Oscar agrees to accept £980 from Humphrey's sister in full satisfaction of the debt D. Humphrey agrees to pay Oscar £700 on 1 May
B. Oscar agrees to accept £980 on 13 May in cash Chapter 1 - Q28
Which of the following statements in relation to contractual remedies is incorrect? A. Specific performance is awarded at the discretion of the court where damages would not be an adequate remedy B. Specific performance is likely to be more appropriate than damages in a contract involving personal services C. Specific performance is likely to be awarded in a contract for the sale of land D. A mandatory injunction often has the same result as specific performance but is less common
B. Specific performance is likely to be more appropriate than damages in a contract involving personal services Chapter 2 - Q9
Siegfried employs Marij to plan and build a go-kart course on his field which he intends to open to the public on 1 May. His viability and market research studies lead him to expect that he will earn £300 per day in the first three months of business. Marij contracts to construct the course and surrounding areas according to certain plans and specifications and to complete the work by no later than 30 March for a contract price of £10,000. The contract provides that Marij will be liable to pay Siegfried £150 for every day work overruns the scheduled completion date. Which of the following best describes the legal position? A. The provision is for unliquidated damages and is valid because it is less than the anticipated loss B. The provision is for liquidated damages and is valid because the figure is not penal in nature and protects Siegfried's legitimate interest C. The provision is void because it states a sum in e
B. The provision is for liquidated damages and is valid because the figure is not penal in nature and protects Siegfried's legitimate interest Chapter 2 - Q8
Anton is learning to drive with his father, when he mistakenly goes into reverse gear instead of first gear, and hits a pedestrian on the road behind him. Although he is moving very slowly, the elderly and frail pedestrian suffers bruising, but also a heart attack induced by the shock. She dies within minutes. Which of the following best describes the legal position? A. The standard of care owed by Anton is that of a reasonable learner driver and the fact that she is especially vulnerable is irrelevant B. The standard of care owed is that of a reasonable driver and it is irrelevant that she was especially vulnerable C. The standard of care owed is that of a reasonable learner driver but the fact that she was especially vulnerable means that a higher standard will be applied D. The standard of care owed is that of a reasonable driver but the fact that she was especially vulnerable means that a higher standard will be
B. The standard of care owed is that of a reasonable driver and it is irrelevant that she was especially vulnerable Chapter 4 - Q7
Which of the following terms describes a contract where one party may set it aside, but property transferred before avoidance is usually irrecoverable from a third party? A. Void B. Voidable C. Unenforceable D. Valid
B. Voidable Chapter 1 - Q2
Which of the following descriptions best describes the statutory test of reasonableness under the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977? A. Whether an ordinary person in the normal course of business would consider the clause to be reasonable in all the circumstances B. Whether it is fair and reasonable, with regard to all the circumstances which were, or which ought to have been known to the parties when the contract was made C. Whether it is fair and reasonable with regard to all the circumstances which were known to or in the reasonable contemplation of the parties D. Whether it is fair and reasonable to exclude liability, having regard to the relative bargaining strengths of the parties
B. Whether it is fair and reasonable, with regard to all the circumstances which were, or which ought to have been known to the parties when the contract was made Chapter 2 - Q12
Which of the following is irrelevant in determining whether a duty of care exists? A. Whether it is fair that the law should impose a duty on the defendant B. Whether the defendant intended to cause injury to the claimant C. Whether it was reasonably foreseeable that the claimant might suffer damage as a result of the defendant's actions D. Whether there is sufficient proximity between the parties
B. Whether the defendant intended to cause injury to the claimant Chapter 4 - Q3
On Monday, Peter writes to Quentin offering to sell his car to Quentin for £900. Peter's letter is received the next day. On Wednesday, Peter posts a letter to Quentin saying that he has changed his mind. Later that day, Quentin speaks to Peter and says that he accepts his offer. Is there a valid contract between Peter and Quentin? A. No, because Peter posted his revocation before Quentin accepted the offer B. Yes, because Quentin accepts the offer before he receives Peter's letter of revocation C. No, because Quentin's acceptance should have been in writing since the offer was made in writing D. Yes, because Quentin's acceptance is made in a more expeditious manner that the offer
B. Yes, because Quentin accepts the offer before he receives Peter's letter of revocation Chapter 1 - Q16
A contract between two businesses included a clause restricting the potential liability of the seller if the goods supplied were not of satisfactory quality. The seller was a large multinational plc, the buyer a small retail shop that operates as a private limited company. Can the seller rely on this clause if they supply unsatisfactory good to the buyer? A. No, because the buyer is in a weaker position than the seller B. Yes, but only if the clause passes the reasonableness test set out in the Unfair Contract Terms Act (UCTA) 1977 C. Yes, the clause applies because there are no restrictions on the terms that can be agreed in a business-to-business contract D. No, because exemption clauses do not apply to the sale of unsatisfactory goods
B. Yes, but only if the clause passes the reasonableness test set out in the Unfair Contract Terms Act (UCTA) 1977 Chapter 2 - Q17
Amanda, Sophia and Nadia are in partnership, in the name of InStyle, providing interior design services to commercial clients. Sophia is a keen gardener and has advertised garden design and landscaping services, also in the name of InStyle. She has even carried out some gardening work and always puts up an InStyle sign at the entrance to the premises where she is working and Amanda and Nadia have not objected to Sophia putting up the sign and have not tried to stop her. In fact, they have welcomed the extra income for the partnership. When Sophia damages a valuable statuette while carrying out some landscaping works, the owner threatens to sue the partnership. Which of the following best describes the legal position? A. InStyle is not liable because Sophia's implied usual authority relates to the interior design work only. B. InStyle is not liable because Sophia is wrongly using the partnership name for what is effec
C Chapter 3 - Q10
Barry, Kevin and Oscar were the directors of Suresend Ltd. No managing director had been appointed but Kelvin and Oscar were well aware that Barry behaved as if he were Suresend Ltd's managing director. In particular Kelvin and Oscar knew that Barry entered into contracts on behalf of the company, including regularly hiring cars and requiring valeting services from Fastfleet Ltd. Kelvin and Oscar have now discovered that Barry has just entered into a contract with Fastfleet Ltd to service all Suresend's delivery vans and lorries. Kelvin and Barry do not wish Suresend Ltd to proceed with this contract with Fastfleet Ltd and claim that Barry had no authority to enter into the contract and have written to Fastfleet to this effect. Which of the following best describes the legal position? A. Suresend is not bound because it provided written revocation of the authority given to Barry. B. Suresend is not bound because Barr
C Chapter 3 - Q11
Kit and Lin are partners in a takeaway pizza business. One of their employees, Jeff, decides to try to improve the business's profits by setting up a parcel delivery operation, using the same business name, that uses the pizza delivery vehicles to deliver the parcels. Kit and Lin do not prevent Jeff doing this and are happy with the extra money the parcel delivery service is making. Which type of authority does Jeff have in regard to the parcel delivery service? A. Actual express authority B. Implied usual authority C. Ostensible authority D. Actual implied authority
C Chapter 3 - Q22
Which term best describes a contract, such as a building contract, that provides for payment at various stages of the contractor's progress? A. A divided contract B. A segmented contract C. A severable contract D. A partial contract
C. A severable contract Chapter 2 - Q1
Abigail agrees to let her flat to Xavier for one day for the purpose of viewing a carnival. Xavier pays her a £50 deposit with £80 due to be paid at the end of the carnival. Die to civil unrest, the government prohibits all street entertainment and the carnival is cancelled just before Xavier is due to travel to the flat. Neither party has incurred any costs (save for payment of the deposit) in performance of the contract. Applying the Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943, which of the following statements is correct? A. Abigail can keep the deposit but cannot claim the balance B. Abigail can keep the deposit and Xavier is liable to pay the balance C. Abigail must pay back the deposit and Xavier need not pay the balance D. Abigail can keep the deposit and Xavier must pay an additional £15 so that each party bears an equal loss
C. Abigail must pay back the deposit and Xavier need not pay the balance Chapter 2 - Q2
Which of the following types of contract must be in writing or evidenced in writing? A. A partnership agreement B. A contract for the sale of goods C. An agreement for the transfer of land D. An employment contract
C. An agreement for the transfer of land Chapter 1 - Q1
Campbells, a firm of accountants, prepared annual accounts for Thespians plc. The director of Moneymakers Ltd, which held shares in Thespians plc, saw the accounts and, as a result, the company lent Thespians plc £100,000 to finance its new premises. In fact, the accounts had been prepared negligently and Thespians plc was actually facing mounting debts. Since there was no disclaimer of liability in the audit report, Moneymakers Ltd sued Campbells. Which of the following best describes the legal position regarding Campbell's potential liability to Moneymakers Ltd? A. Campbells is liable because it owes a duty of care to potential lenders B. Campbells is liable because it knew that Moneymakers Ltd was a shareholder and would therefore have sight of the accounts C. Campbells is not liable because the accounts were not prepared for the purpose of enabling people to decide whether or not to lend to the company D. Campbel
C. Campbells is not liable because the accounts were not prepared for the purpose of enabling people to decide whether or not to lend to the company Chapter 4 - Q12
Which of the following statements best describes consideration? A. Consideration must be adequate and sufficient B. Consideration must be adequate but need not be sufficient C. Consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate D. Consideration need be neither sufficient not adequate
C. Consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate Chapter 1 - Q24
A local newspaper advertises "50 Whizzalong scooters remaining. 3 feet high. Only £20 each." Which legal term best describes the advert? A. Offer B. Statement of intention C. Invitation to treat D. Supply of information
C. Invitation to treat Chapter 1 - Q6
Gary intends to promise Carl that he (Gary) will pay the bets owed to Carl by Duncan, in the event that Duncan fails to pay them himself. Which of the following is true with regard to Gary's proposed guarantee so that it will be enforceable in a court of law? A. It must be by deed B. It must be in writing C. It can be oral provided it is evidenced in writing D. It can be oral only
C. It can be oral provided it is evidence in writing Chapter 1 - Q3
Zoe was employed to give one lunchtime recital per month at a prestigious eating venue in London. Her contract contained a provision that she would stay behind and meet with appreciative members of the audience after the recital, as part of the venue's aim of making music more accessible and less elitist. After about 18 months, Zoe's recitals had become very popular but she was always keen to get away quickly after each performance. The manager offered her £50 (on top of her recital fee) if she would stay behind and meet with appreciative members of the audience for up to an hour after each recital. Can Zoe enforce the promise to pay her the extra £50? A. Yes. It is a fresh promise that the manager chose to make B. Yes, because the contractual provision had become redundant through its non-observance C. No, because she was obliged to perform that duty anyway D. No. It was simply a goodwill gesture and is not intended
C. No, because she was obliged to perform that duty anyway Chapter 1 - Q26
Monster Mowers Ltd agrees to sell one of its ride-on mowers to Geoff in the knowledge that Geoff is taking on new customers from Percy, a commercial gardener, who is retiring and that Geoff is unable to cope with the increased workload with his present mower. The company fails to deliver the mower until 10 days after the due date for delivery and Geoff is forced to continue working with his old mower as best he can. As a result he is unable to complete all the contracts he has agreed with Percy's old customers. He is also unable to accept an offer from the local botanical gardens to be their grass-cutting contractor for the next 12 months because he cannot begin work immediately. Which of the following statements best describes the legal position of Monster Mowers Ltd? A. The company would be entitled to assume that Geoff could perform his contracts without the new mower and will not be liable for damages as a result
C. The company will be liable for damages in respect of breaches of Geoff's contracts with all his customers but not in respect of the botanical gardens' potential contract as this was not a normal loss and the company was not aware of it Chapter 2 - Q4
John drives in a careless fashion down a narrow street with cars parked on each side of the road, actually knocking the wing mirrors off two of the cars. While Naomi is watching him, she trips on some tools that have been left out by council workmen laying new kerbstones and breaks her ankle. Which of the following best describes the legal position? A. John is liable because his negligent driving causes her to trip B. Naomi is liable because she does not look where she is going C. The local authority is liable because its workers are negligent in leaving tools on the pavement D. John and the local authority are both liable because they both caused her injury
C. The local authority is liable because its workers are negligent in leaving tools on the pavement Chapter 4 - Q9
All of the following, except one, have the effect of terminating an offer. Which is the exception? A. Rejection B. Counter offer C. When a pre-condition is satisfied D. A lapse of time
C. When a pre-condition is satisfied Chapter 1 - Q7
Mr and Mrs Higgins own two flats in Bristol which they let to students. When their eldest son, Crispin, was offered a place at Bristol University to read Law, he and his parents entered into a tenancy agreement allowing him to reside at one of the flats during his university studies for a rent of £190 per month. He was allowed to sublet the second bedroom for a rent of £200 per month. In the light of the rebuttable presumption that no intention to create legal relations exists in the case of a family, social or domestic arrangement, which of the following statements best describes the legal position as to whether the necessary intention to create legal relations exists in this instance? A. No, because it is a family or domestic arrangement and so no such intention is presumed B. No, because the fact that Crispin pays a reduced rent is evidence that no such intention exists C. Yes, the normal presumption in family arr
C. Yes, the normal presumption in family arrangements is rebutted by the fact that the parties enter into a written agreement and rent is payable Chapter 1 - Q22
An accountant has given incorrect tax advice to one of their clients. The error on the part of the accountant constituted negligence. Do they face potential liability in: A. contract only? B. tort only? C. contract and tort? D. neither contract nor tort, but in misrepresentation?
C. contract and tort? Chapter 4 - Q10
Stephen lives near an isolated headland in Cornwall. One day, he sees a Rolls Royce parked on the beach. No one is in sight but the tide is coming in rapidly. Stephen calls his neighbour and arranges for him to come and tow the Rolls Royce up the beach to safety. The neighbour is happy to oblige but wants payment for what he has done. When the owner, Anthony, returns, he refuses to pay because he says the action was not necessary. Which of the following best describes the legal position? A. An agency of necessity has arisen because Stephen is unable to contact Anthony. B. An agency of necessity has arisen because there is an emergency situation and a pressing need for action. C. No agency of necessity has arisen because the Rolls Royce is not a perishable good and Stephen's action was not reasonable. D. No agency of necessity has arisen because there is no pre-existing contractual relationship between Stephen and Ant
D Chapter 3 - Q2
Reece's parked car was damaged by the negligent driving of Jack on 1 January 20X0. He understands that there is a limitation period in regards to claiming damages in respect of tortious acts. On which date will Reece be prevented from putting in a claim for the damages to his car? A. 1 January 20X3 B. 1 January 20X4 C. 1 January 20X5 D. 1 January 20X6
D. 1 January 20X6 Chapter 4 - Q19
Henry agreed to advertise the services provided by his father's business, The Complete Service Ltd, in appropriate publications over a period of 24 months. It was agreed that Henry would be liable to pay a sum of £5,000 in respect of any advertising error or missed deadline. Which of the following describes this contractual provision? A. A liquidated damages clause B. An unliquidated damages clause C. An exclusion clause D. A penalty clause
D. A penalty clause Chapter 2 - Q6
Colin was engaged as a coach of the South of England Athletics Squad (SEAS) and his contract contained a clause that he would not coach any other team without the consent of the SEAS. The SEAS management discovered that unknown to them, he had in fact been coaching the South Wales team for three months and brought action against him for breach of contract. Which of the following is the most likely remedy to be granted in addition to possible damages? A. A mandatory injunction B. A quantum meruit award C. Specific performance D. A prohibitory injunction
D. A prohibitory injunction Chapter 2 - Q10
Which of the following may be used to resolve disputes, even after court proceeding have been commenced? 1) Negotiation 2) Expert determination 3) Mediation 4) Adjuducation A. 1 only B. 2 + 3 + 4 C. 1 + 4 D. All of them
D. All of them Chapter 2 - Q15
Denzil puts a notice in the local post office saying "Reward. Lost cavalier King Charles spaniel named Barnie. £150 reward for his safe return". Florence finds Barnie and, unaware of Denzil's notice, takes him to Denzil's home address which is inscribed on the dog's name tag. Which of the following statements best describes the legal position? A. Florence is not entitled to the reward. The offer is invalid as it is not made to an identifiable class of persons B. Florence is entitled to the reward. The offer is valid and her acceptance of the offer can be inferred from her act of returning the dog C. Florence is not entitled to the reward. She failed to claim the reward at the time of returning Barnie (and accepting Denzil's offer) and has therefore waived her right to receive it D. Florence is not entitled to the reward as she did not even know that a reward was being offered
D. Florence is not entitled to the reward as she did not even know that a reward was being offered Chapter 1 - Q4
Frank offered Mary his lawnmower for £200. Mary asked whether he might be willing to accept £100 now and £100 at the end of the month when she is paid. Which of the following best describes the status of Mary's reply? A. It is a rejection of Frank's offer B. It is an implied acceptance because she was clearly agreeable to the price C. It is a counter offer D. It is a request for information
D. It is a request for information Chapter 1 - Q10
Brown & Cameron, a firm of accountants, prepares accounts for Target plc, showing a profit of £800,000 when they should, in fact, have shown a loss of £8,000. Marnie owned 300 shares in the company and, after reading the accounts that were sent to her (as to all shareholders), she purchased an additional 500 shares. When it came to light that the accounts had been prepared negligently (and the share price tumbled as a result of that negligence), Marnie sued the accountants for negligence. There was no disclaimer of liability in the audit report. Which of the following best describes the legal position in respect of the potential liability of the firm, Brown & Cameron to Marnie? A. It is liable because the partners in the firm knew that the accounts would be sent to all shareholders B. It is liable because it was reasonably foreseeable that existing shareholders would rely on the accounts for the purpose of reviewing
D. It is not liable because the firm did not owe a duty to existing shareholders who rely on the accounts for a purpose other than that for which they were intended Chapter 4 - Q11
Prunella agrees to pay Paul £500 if Paul will landscape Phillip's garden. There is no agency relationship and the Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 does not apply. Who may enforce the terms of the contract? A. Prunella, Paul and Phillip B. Prunella and Phillip only C. Paul and Phillip only D. Prunella and Paul only
D. Prunella and Paul only Chapter 1 - Q30
All of the following options, except one, must be shown by a claimant in order to succeed in an action for negligence. Which is the exception? A. That the defendant owed them a duty of care B. That the defendant was in breach of a duty of care C. That the claimant suffered injury, damage or loss as a result of a breach of a duty of care D. That the damage was not too remote
D. That the damage was not too remote Chapter 4 - Q5
Matt runs a small hotel. One of his friends, Louise, decorated two of the bedrooms for him, as a surprise, when he was away on holiday. On his return, Matt was delighted and agreed to give her a laptop in consideration for all her work. As a separate matter, he also agreed to pay Louise's brother, Adam, the sum of £300 to fit new lights and sockets in the bedrooms. Adam performs the work. When Louise and Adam come to collect the laptop and the money Matt refuses to give them either. Which of the following statements is correct? A. The contract with Louise is valid; the contract with Adam is valid B. The contract with Louise is valid; the contract with Adam is invalid C. The contract with Louise is invalid; the contract with Adam is invalid D. The contract with Louise is invalid; the contract with Adam is valid
D. The contract with Louise is invalid; the contract with Adam is valid Chapter 1 - Q33
Ralph writes to Theo offering to buy Theo's sand yacht for £300. In his letter, he writes "If I do not hear from you, I shall consider it mine and pick it up on Tuesday." Which of the following best describes the legal position as to whether or not a contract exists? A. There is a contract because Ralph waived the need for acceptance B. There is a contract because Theo complied with Ralph's terms exactly C. There is a contract because acceptance can be inferred from Theo's conduct D. There is no contract because there is no positive act to indicate acceptance
D. There is no contract because there is no positive act to indicate acceptance Chapter 1 - Q13
All of the following statements, except one, were established by, or relevant to, the landmark case of Donoghue v Stevenson, which involved an allegation that there had been a decomposing snail in a bottle of ginger beer? Which is the exception? A. No contractual relationship is necessary to found an action for negligence B. There must be a sufficient degree of proximity or neighbourhood between the parties C. A manufacturer could owe a duty of care to a person who did not actually buy its goods D. There should be a special relationship of some sort between the parties
D. There should be a special relationship of some sort between the parties Chapter 4 - Q6