Philosophy Final

Ace your homework & exams now with Quizwiz!

Conjunctive statement

A and B So, A and So, B

Good counterexample

A substitution instance in which the premises are well known truths and the conclusion is a well known falsehood.

1. A substitution instance of an argument form may be valid even if the argument form itself is invalid

False

1. Some arguments are false.

False

Every argument with a valid form is valid

True

Counterexample method

1) Identify the most logically sensitive form of the argument. Use capital letters to stand for statements or terms. 2) Find English statements or terms that, if substituted for the capital letters in the conclusion of the argument form, produces a well known falsehood. 3) Substitute these Englishe statements or terms for the relevant capital letters uniformly throughout the argument form. 4) Find English statements or terms that, if substituted uniformly for the remaining capital letters in the argument form, produce premises that are well known truths. 5) Check your work, if you have succeeded, you have shown the argument to be invalid.

Form 1

A B So, A and B

Statement

A declarative sentence that is either true or false.

Constructive Dillema

A or B If A then C If B then D So, C or D

Disjunctive Syllogism Version 1

A or B Not A So, B

Disjunctive Syllogism Version 2

A or B Not B So, A

Form 2

A or B Not both A and B A So, Not B

Argument Form

A pattern of reasoning

Argument form

A pattern of reasoning

Argument

A set of statements where some of the statements; called the premises, are intended to support another, called the conclusion.

As understood by logicians, an argument is....

A set of statements, one of which is supported by the others

A premise of an argument is...

A statement intended to provide support for another statement

Categorical Statement

A statement that relates two classes or categories, where a class is a set or a collection of things. Often signaled by terms like "all", "some", and "no"

Cogent Argument

A strong argument in which all of its premises are true.

Counter example

A substitution instance in which the premises are true and the conclusion is false.

Sound argument

A valid argument in which all of the premises are true.

A term is...

A word or phrase that stands for a class of things

Term

A word or phrase that stands for a class of things.

Form 6 - Total Encapsulation - Valid

All A are B All B are C So, All A are C

Form 7 - Partial Occlusion - Valid

All A are B Some C are Not B So, Some C are not A

Valid Argument Form

An argument form in which every substitution instance is a valid argument.

Invalid argument form

An argument form that has some invalid substitution instances.

Valid argument form

An argument in which every substitution instance is a valid argument

Valid argument

An argument in which it is necessary that, if the premises are true, then the conclusion is true.

Invalid argument

An argument in which it is not necessary that, if the premises are true, then the conclusion is true.

Weak Argument

An argument in which it is not probable that, if the premises are true, that the conclusion is true.

Strong Argument

An argument in which it is probable (but not necessary) that, if the premises are true, then then conclusion is true.

Deductive argument

An argument in which the premises are intended to guarantee the conclusion.

Inductive argument

An argument in which the premises are intended to make the conclusion probable, without guaranteeing it.

Uncogent Argument

An argument that is either weak, or strong with at lease one false premise.

Unsound argument

An argument that is invalid or has at least one false premise.

Formally valid argument

An argument that is valid in virtue of its form

Formally Valid Argument

An argument that is valid in virtue of its form.

Substitution Instance

An argument that results from uniformly replacing the variables in an argument form with statements (or terms)

Substitution instance

An argument that results from uniformly replacing the variables in an argument form with statements (or terms)

Disjunction

An either-or statement

Appeal to Authority

An expert in the field says that P is true So, Probably P is True

Conditional statement

An if - then statement

Conditional Statement

An if-then statement, often simply called a "conditional"

1. A disjunctive syllogism has the following form:

Either A or B; Not A; So, B.

Form 8 - Partial Encapsulation - Valid

Every A is a B Some A are C So, some B are C

Modus Ponens

If A then B A So, B

Fallacy of affirming the consequent

If A then B B So, A

Hypothetical Syllogism

If A then B If B then C So, If A then C

Fallacy of denying the antecedant

If A then B Not A So, Not B

Modus Tollens

If A then B Not B So, Not A

Identify the form of the Fallacy of Denying the Antecedent

If A, then B. Not A. So, Not B.

What is the form of the fallacy of Denying the Antecedent

If A, then B. Not A. So, Not B.

1. A hypothetical syllogism has the following form:

If A, then B; If B, then C; So, if A, then C

1. The fallacy of denying the antecedent has the following form:

If A, then B; Not A; So, not B.

1. The argument form "If A then B; Not B; So, not A" is called

Modus Tollens

Statistical Syllogism

N% of Fs are Gs X is an F So, X is a G

Enumerative Induction

N% of observed Fs have been Gs So, probably N% of Fs are Gs

Not being able to figure out a counterexample proves

Nothing

1. An invalid argument form in one that has

Some invalid substitution instance

Negation of a statement

The denial of the statement

A good counterexample shows that the argument form is not valid by showing that

The form does not preserve the truth in every instance

Antecedant

The if-clause of a conditional (not including the word "if")

Inductive Logic

The part of logic that is concerned with the study of methods of evaluating arguments for strength and weakness.

Deductive Logic

The part of logic that is concerned with the study of methods of evaluating arguments for validity and invalidity.

Conjuncts

The statements comprising a conjunction

Disjuncts

The statements comprising a disjunction

Logic

The study of methods for evaluating whether the premises of an argument adequately support its conclusion.

Consequent

The then-clause of a conditional (not including the word "then")

1. All invalid arguments can have false premises and a true conclusion.

True

1. In "If Suzie goes to the party, then John will go," the antecedent is "Suzie goes to the party.

True

29. A conditional statement is the same thing as a hypothetical statement

True

A statement is either true or false

True

1. When "or" is taken in the exclusive sense, the statement "We'll go swimming or hiking" says what?

We'll go swimming or hiking, but not both

Argument from Analogy

X and Y share properties F, G, and H X also has property I So, Y probably has property I

An argument form is

a pattern of reasoning

buttercup is a yellow parakeet this is

a statement

pigs can fly this is

a statement

A categorical statement is

a statement that relates two classes or categories

1. Which of the following is a substitution instance of the argument form "All A are B; No B are C; So, no A are C"?

a. All dogs are fish; No dogs are mammals; So, no fish are mammals. b. All dogs are mammals; No fish are mammals; So, no dogs are fish. c. All mammals are dogs; No mammals are fish; So, no fish are dogs. d. All fish are dogs; No dogs are mammals; So, no fish are mammals

Which of the following is an example of a conditional statement?

a. All whales are mammals. b. It's not the case that Sue loves Bill. c. If Pamela loves Joe, then Joe loves Pamela. d. Either Bob or Jim will ask Mary to the dance

1. The fallacy of affirming the consequent has the following form

a. If A, then B; B; So, A.

1. The statement "If Monarchos wins the Belmont Stakes, then Monarchos will be a Triple Crown winner" is a disjunction.

false

9. All valid arguments have true conclusions

false

A good counterexample employs well-known truths for its premises and conclusion.

false

A substitution instance of an argument form may valid even if the argument form itself is invalid

false

All arguments have more than one premise

false

All sentences are statements

false

An argument is any set of statements

false

"go to your room!" this is

not a statement

1. An argument that results from uniformly replacing letters in an argument form with terms or statements is a substitution instance of that form.

true

1. If an argument form is invalid, then so is every substitution instance of that argument form

true

A counterexample proves that an argument form is invalid

true

An argument that results from uniformly replacing letter in an argument form with terms or statements is a substitution of that form

true

An arguments conclusion is affirmed on the basis of its premises.

true

Commands are not statements

true

More than one argument can have the same form

true

More than one argument is the same thing as a hypothetical statement

true

The statements comprising an "either-or" sentence are called disjuncts

true


Related study sets

1st Quarter Literature Exam 1 PT 2

View Set

SmartBook Chapter 10 (MKTG 4400)

View Set