24

Which options correctly identify the legal issues in the case of Riley v. California? Select all that apply. US Supreme Court: Riley v. California

.25 right: whether David Riley's Eighth Amendment rights were violated whether David Riley's Fourth Amendment rights were violated

Read the sentences. Carolyn forgot to set her alarm. She arrived at the theater in time for the performance. Which option best combines these sentences?

Although Carolyn forgot to set her alarm, she arrived at the theater in time for the performance.

Read the passage. I was waiting in line at the department store return counter. I got more and more frustrated. Calls were constantly being taken by the clerk on her cell phone. Which option shows the best way to revise the passage for clarity and cohesion?

As I waited in line at the department store's return counter, I became more and more frustrated because the clerk was constantly taking calls on her cell phone.

In Riley v. California, which fact helped the court determine that this case's search and seizure was unreasonable? US Supreme Court: Riley v. California

Cell phones do not pose an immediate physical threat to police officers; therefore, this search and seizure action was a violation of Fourth Amendment rights.

If you look in a thesaurus to find synonyms for the word anarchy, which words are you most likely to find? Select all that apply.

Chaos disorder

In the court case Ingraham v. Wright, the court ruling determined that _[blank]_. Which option best completes the sentence? US Supreme Court: Ingraham v. Wright

Eighth Amendment protections do not apply in cases of corporal punishment in public schools

Read the excerpt from "US Supreme Court: Ingraham v. Wright." Elimination or curtailment of corporal punishment would be welcomed by many as a societal advance. But when such a policy choice may result from this Court's determination of an asserted right to due process, rather than from the normal processes of community debate and legislative action, the societal costs cannot be dismissed as insubstantial. Which option best explains how this information fits into the chain of legal reasoning? US Supreme Court: Ingraham v. Wright

It is part of the analysis in the case, because it considers whether local regulations could be limited if the court finds that students' rights were violated.

Which options accurately describe how the US Supreme Court's conclusion regarding Ingraham v. Wright compared with the decisions of the lower courts? Select all that apply. US Supreme Court: Ingraham v. Wright

It supported the District Court's decision that the students' constitutional rights had not been violated.. It overruled the Court of Appeals' decision, which found that the students were indeed subjected to cruel and unusual punishment.

In the chain of legal reasoning, the rule must be _[blank]_and _[blank]_. Which words correctly complete the sentence?

NOT: Claimed; stated cited; explained

Which option correctly describes the function of the conclusion in the chain of legal reasoning?

NOT: The conclusion shows whether the rule has been supported in a previous court case. The conclusion proposes a specific issue that relates to a specific rule.

Read the sentence. The realization that the sun rises and sets, the moon waxes and wanes, and the ebbing and flowing of the tides can inspire belief in an orderly universe. Which option shows the best way to rewrite the sentence?

NOT: The realization that the sun rises and sets, the moon waxes and wanes, and the ebb and flow of the tides can inspire belief in an orderly universe. The realization that the sun rises and sets, the moon waxes and wanes, and the tidal ebb and flow can inspire belief in an orderly universe.

Which option most accurately explains how an evaluation of the facts led to the conclusion of the case Riley v. California? US Supreme Court: Riley v. California

NOT: Warrantless search and seizure is an unconstitutional violation of human rights; therefore, searches of individual phones are now outlawed unconditionally. Warrantless search and seizure is permitted when a police officer feels his or her life is in danger; therefore, the search of this individual's phone was lawful.

A court's legal decision should always be based on _[blank]_. Which option best completes the sentence?

reasoning