Argument 3 script
line 2
AVs are not merely cutting-edge technology. They also bring with them complex ethical landscape that demands our attention.
line 6
Additionally, a study by Wang et al. (2020) indicates a critical gap in addressing ethical challenges within autonomous vehicles. Proposed solutions lack completeness and realism.
line 7
Furthermore, manufacturers and policy makers offer different ethical priorities.
line 1
Hello everyone, I'm Carlo Allan Laynes, and I am here to discuss our third argument: Life threatening ethical dilemmas concerning the decision-making of autonomous vehicles in critical situations.
line 3
In 2018, an Uber self-driving car accident in Tempe, Arizona, faced a scenario where split-second decision were required to ensure the safety of both the passenger and the pedestrian. Unfortunately, this led to a tragic pedestrian fatality.
line 5
In a study by Awad et al. 2018, cultural variations present a significant hurdle in programming ethical decisions for these vehicles. The existence of different cultural values makes uniform decision-making a complicated task.
line 8
This evidence suggests that the current solutions are still in development and may not entirely reflect the practical real-world implementation of resolving the ethical challenges related to AVs. Thus suggesting a need for a more unified and practical ethical framework for implementation.
line 4
This incident sheds light on the complex decisions AVs may encounter.