cases
Pierce the corporate veil
A court holds shareholders personally liable for the debts of the corporation
Corporate Social Responsibility
Companies' acknowledged responsibility to society
Weirum v. RKO General
KHJ radio station (KHJ), owned by RKO General, Inc. (RKO) (defendant), conducted a contest one summer where listeners were invited to follow and locate one of KHJ's disc jockeys, Steele
Bowman v. Monsanto
Monsanto Company (Monsanto) (plaintiff) developed and patented a soybean seed with a genetic modification that enabled the soybean to survive exposure to certain herbicides. Monsanto only sold these patented seeds to purchasers who agreed to a licensing agreement
McDonalds v. Quality Inn Hotel
Quality Inns International, Inc. (Quality) (plaintiff) marketed a new chain of hotels to be called "McSleep Inn."
Vana White v. Samsung
Samsung alleging infringement of various intellectual property rights arising from an ad consciously depicting a robot standing in front of what is instantly recognizable as the Wheel of Fortune game board.
Suzuki and Consumer Reports
Samurai experienced what they deemed as an unacceptable amount of tipover while undertaking the severe turn.
Articles of Incorporation
The document filed with a state government to establish the existence of a new corporation.
Midler v. Ford
against Ford Motor Company for a series of commercials in the 1980s which used a Midler impersonator
Fiduciary Duties
and the person to whom he owes the duty,
Liebeck v. McDonalds
coffee
NFIB v. Sebelius
including a requirement for most Americans to have health insurance by 2014.
Russell Christoff
nestle misapropriation
Volkswagen v. Woodson
olkswagen retailer in New York. On a drive to Arizona, the residents got in a car accident while driving through Oklahoma. A defective gas tank in the car allegedly caused the acciden
Faverty v. McDonalds
too many shifts
Elk School District v. Newdow
ven if they choose not to participate - to the words "under God" violates the establishment clause of the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment.
State of Washington v. Arlene's Flowers
was filed by a gay couple after Stutzman denied floral arrangements for their wedding. The couple had been customers of Stutzman's shop for nine years, but when they asked her to provide flowers for their wedding, the florist declined
