Research Design

¡Supera tus tareas y exámenes ahora con Quizwiz!

Spearman rho

A correlational technique used primarily for rank ordered data (ordinal scale); nonparametric

Canonical correlation

A correlational technique used when there are two or more X and two or more Y. (Example: The correlation between (age and sex) and (income and life satisfaction)

Likert scale

A representation of a continuous attitudinal variable; A numerical scale used to assess people's attitudes that includes a set of possible answers and that has anchors on each extreme; True Lickert scale is 5-point and has midpoint, i.e., neither disagree/agree

Delimiting variable

A variable that is constraining generalization of results.

Target population

Population that is of interest to the investigator and about which generalizations of study results are intended. To whom do you want to generalize results? "Universe" For example, you want to generalize your findings to all elementary school teachers.

Power rule of thumb

Power needs to be .8 or better (Beta error of 80%). Calculate power by 1-probability of a Type 2 error.

Mixed methods--triangulation

Qualitative and quantitative done simultaneously

Q-M-R-I-C: Alignment of the Chain of Reasoning

Question-Method-Results-Interpretation-Conclusion

Cluster Sampling

Random, but random by clusters/groups of individuals (i.e., a randomly selected class of students, a randomly selected block of residents)

Precision of measurement

Refers to the validity and reliability of the score you get; lack of error and being on target with what you're trying to measure.

RP--RPS--RQ--RH--RNH

Research Problem--Research Problem Statement--Research Question--Research Hypothesis--Research Null Hypothesis

Same Thing in 3 Theories 1. true score 2. universe score 3. ability or trait parameter

Same Thing in 3 Theories 1. hypothetical error-free score in classicla test theory 2. Generalizability theory 3. Item Response Theory

SBR

Scientifically Based Research

SRS

Simple Random Sample--Each element has an equal chance of being selected; names out of a hat

Effect size

Smaller differences require a larger sample. Heterogeneous population requires larger sample. Homogeneous population requires smaller sample.

If you don't get variability in your measure then....

you won't find a relationship.

General Evolution of Research

1. Descriptive research 2. Comparative research 3. Experimental research 4. Training designs

Type 1 Error

Rejecting a true null hypothesis; Saying there is a significant difference when there isn't a difference

consequential validity

The way in which the implementation of a test can affect the interpretability of test scores; the practical consequences of the introduction of a test

consequential validity

The way in which the implementation of a test can affect the interpretability of test scores; the practical consequences of the introduction of a test (unintended or intended)

Population

Theoretical group of elements to which we intend to generalize results

Accuracy

Variability is reduced with a larger sample size. Reduced variability leads to increased accuracy.

Bivariate correlational design

Correlational, looks for relationships between variables, also called "zero-order" correlation

Endogenous variable

DV, have arrows pointing to them in a graphic model of the theory

Cross-sectional research design

Data collected at one point in time, giving a snapshot, i.e., comparing Freshmen in 2012 with Seniors in 2012; Can be strengthened by matching for important variables

Factor analysis

a statistical procedure that identifies clusters of related items (called factors) on a test(create subscales); used to identify different dimensions of performance that underlie one's total score

test-criterion relationship

includes concurrent and predictive validity; these were old validity terms that now fit here under evidence based on relations to other variables.

Parametric tests

independent samples t-test, dependent samples t-test, ANOVA, repeated measures ANOVA

Research question

indicates the logic of design, variables, and an indication of sample; should be succinct, clear and complete; usually several RQs in a single study

Sampling error

is directly and inversely related to the sample size and homogeneity of the sample; the bigger the sample, the smaller the error; the more homogeneous the sample, the smaller the error (?)

IV

manipulated variable, the intervention variable

Multiple regression

measure of linear relationship based on several independent variables and a single dependent variable; used to predict and explain; uses a regression equation model (model+error=outcome); an inferential test of statistical significance; determination of the percentage of variation in the outcome that can be predicted by the independent variables--variance is explained by the model/total variance.

Nonparametric tests

median test, Mann-Whitney U (rank ordered data), Wilcoxan Matched Pairs Signed Ranks test, Kruskal-Wallis H test (rank ordered data), Friedman's test (ANOVA of ranks)

Criterion-referenced tests

negatively skewed, restricted range, standard setting problems. (e.g., state by state, NCLB)

Assumptions for parametric tests

normality, homogeneity, interval level variables

construct irrelevant variance

occurs when scores are influenced by factors irrelevant to the construct; measure capture extra "stuff" that is irrelevant to the construct being examined (example--test anxiety that hinders performance on a math test)

DV

outcome variable, usually continuous

Norm-referenced tests

performance reported as compared to normed group; Who is the norm group? That's important; (SAT, Stanford); tends to give general measures; it's difficult to show changes in norm-referenced tests.

Mixed methods-exploratory

qualitative and then quantitative

Mixed methods--explanatory

quantitative and then qualitative

Research hypothesis

succinct, specific statement that indicates a testable prediction about the nature of the relationship between two or more variables, i.e., "There is a positive relationships between ____ and ____." "Students in X condition will demonstrate more Y than students in Z condition."

What are the components of statistical significance?

sample size, difference in the means, and standard error of the means

Beta weight

standardized regression coefficient; used to describe skewness and kurtosis

Standard error of measurement

the difference between the actual score and the highest or lowest hypothetical score; unrelated to the accuracy of scoring. (from VA DOE handout)

Measurement

the process of assigning numbers or looking at a variable quantitatively (usually with a scale)

dummy variable

the way a dichotomous independent variable is represented in regression analysis by assigning a 0 to one group and a 1 to the other; identify a group (i.e., 0 for male and 1 for female)

Goal of measurement

to capture the DV with PRECISION, SUFFICIENT VARIABILITY, and SENSITIVITY to investigate relationships and/or differences

Histogram

used for continuous categories, i.e., 1-3, 4-6., 7-9

Bar chart

used for discrete categories, i.e., chocolate, vanilla, strawberry

Confounding variable

variable that can't be separated out from the levels of IV; a function of the experimental design

Moderating variable

variable that changes (intensifies, weakens or reverses) the nature of the relationship between two other variables.

Systematic sampling

when you have a list and you select every nth person on the list, (every 9th, 10th, etc.); This is just as good as SRS and even better if you can rank order your list.

***Advantages of SEM over ANOVA & regression

-can include observed and latent variables and relationshipsamong latent constructs can be examined -Several DVs can be studied in a single analysis -Equation residuals can be correlated in SEM

Generalizability Theory/IRT (Measurement error)

...

To increase variability in DV measure...

...use a scale with more choices (i.e., 7 point scale instead of 3 point scale) ....if you must use dichotomous questions, use MORE questions.

True Experimental design

with randomization or random assignment

AERA

American Educational Research Association

Method

Consider Sampling, Instrumentation and Procedures/Intervention; Method--SIP

Types of evidence that rule out random sources of error

1. stability (test-retest) 2. equivalence (alternate-form) 3. stability and equivalence 4. internal consistency 5. agreement (inter-tester; inter-rater) 6. generalizability theory

Rules of thumb for sample size

1. Comparative research--15-20 in each group 2. Correlational research--at least 30 for bivariate 3. Multiple regression--60+30 for each new variable 4. Experimental--15+ (Need more for applied research; Need 8 per group with random assignment and homogeneity of group)

Types of Nonprobability Sampling

1. Convenience (available; haphazard) 2. Purposeful (purposive; judgmental) 3. Quota (keep sampling until you get what you need, i.e., enough male teachers) 4. Volunteers

Types of nonexperimental research

1. Descriptive 2. Comparative (differences...What is difference between _____ and ____? 3. Correlational (relationships...can be bivariate, multivariate, predictions, correlational path analysis) 4. Causal comparative or ex post facto

Principles of scientific, evidence-based inquiry

1. Pose good questions that are testable (can get empirically-based answers) and that impact knowledge 2. Link to theory 3. Methods appropriate to RQs 4. Coherent, explicit chain of reasoning 5. Replicate and generalize appropriately 6. Disclose and dissiminate

How do you know that you are using a measurement with precision, sufficient variability and sensitivity?

1. Read the literature. 2. Pilot test.

Types of Probability Sampling

1. SRS 2. Systematic 3. Stratified 4. Cluster

How to design research to maximize differences and/or relationships

1. Select variables that will be sufficiently sensitive. Sometimes the more specific the concept variable the better (i.e. academic self concept vs. self-concept) 2. Develop/select measures that provide variability. 3. Select samples that provide high variability for targeted variables.

Types of longitudinal research

1. Trend--selecting samples from a changing population (having 5th grade teachers complete survey every year--won't be the same teachers, but it will always be 5th grade teachers and show trends of 5th grade teachers) 2. Cohort--Selecting samples from the same population--A sample of 1999 grads one year and another sample of 1999 grads every five years thereafter. 3. Panel--using the same sample throughout--the same participants over time/high attrition rate

Power is related to...

1. effect size 2. n (sample size) 3. p-value

External sources of measurement error

1. procedures, items, context (M&J "Random"); 2. bias from researchers administering measure; 3. observer bias

Types of regression

1. simultaneous--enter model into SPSS 2. Stepwise--most common; as variable goes in, the computer enters variable that is most related and then moves to the next variable 3. Heirarchical--research determines order of variable entry and controls/adjusts for effect of that variable 4. Logistical--has to do with the odds of something happening; dichotomous DV 5. Discriminant function-dichotomouse DV; used to determine if student will fit into certain group or not.

Evidence for reliability

1. stability (high correlation between test--restest score) 2. equivalence (high correlation between alternate form of measurement given) 3. internal consistency (most commonly used evidence for reliability; use Cronbach's alpha to report reliability between test items) 4. agreement--(inter-tester and inter-rater reliability) 5. generalizability theory--reliability is seen as a characteristic of the use of the test scores rather than a property of the test itself

Type 2 Error

Accepting a false null hypothesis; Failing to find a difference when there is a difference.

What is purpose of SEM?

Allows you to study and test complex relationships among variables where variables may be observed or unobserved; model-based approach--we can test theoretical models to evaluate their validity, see if the theorized model fits what happens in the real world. Structural Equation Modeling is used to determine whether a hypothesized theoretical model is consist with data collected; model is hypothesized apriori; SEM confirms a model; it evaluates the measurement model and the path model; sometimes called causal modeling

Structural Equation Modeling

Also known as latent variable modeling; Provides data on fit between theory and model; Can incorporate latent variables; Variables not measured, only approximated Included in the SEM diagram; Need LISREL software; used a lot in EdPsych

Evaluation (as related to measurement)

Determining the meaning of the measurement numbers; determining the merit/worth of the measurement

Stratified sampling

Divide population first and then select from the separate groups. This can be used to enhance accuracy of estimates. If you stratify and select from each group, you reduce standard error. Advantages of stratified sampling are 1) more representative sample and 2) reduced standard error.

Effect size rule of thumb...

Effect size should be .33 or greater.

Causal Comparison Design

Existing groups that experience different interventions that are not controlled by experimenter; Looks like an experiement; Natural experiment with intervention, but the intervention was not controlled by the researcher

About standardization...

Greater flexibility almost inevitably increases measurement error, but the sacrifice in reliability may reduce construct irrelevance or construct underrepresentation in the assessment, which may improve validity. Hmmmmm......

Test-criterion relationship

How accurately do test scores PREDICT criterion performance? This is used as evidence for validity.

Operational definition

How the conceptual definition is measured for the study, i.e, the specific scale used

exogenous variable

IV, arrow point away from them to the DV/endogenous variable

Internal sources of measurement error

within the subject subject bias social desirability luck health demand characteristics (M&J "Participant")

Consequences of using a sample that is too small...

Increased chance of high variability in the sample. Increased chance of committing a Type 2 error (fail to find an exisiting difference)

Proportional stratified sampling

Insure proportionate representation of specific variables in sample. For example, if 75% of teachers are female, and you insure 75% of your sample is female

Ex post facto design

Like an experimental design, except that it already happened, so researcher is studying after the fact, did not create/plan/control experiment; Existing groups with different "interventions" in the past

Classical Test Theory (Measurement error)

Observed score = true score + error (internal and external error) + bias

Extraneous variable

Outside variable that may affect the dependent variable, i.e. lighting, noise, etc. Outside of the experiment design

Quasi experimental design

without randomization or random assignment

Benefits of SEM

Structural Equation Modeling can be used 1) to investigate directional influence and causal relations of multiple variables 2) to study the relationship among latent constructs that are indicated by multiple measures; 3) with experimental and non-experimental data 4) cross-sectional or longitudinal data

Survey or Study Population

The accessible population; population from whom you drew your sample. For example, you selected your sample from elementary teachers in Hanover County, Virginia.

Population size

The bigger the population, the lower the sample size required. Think of rent chart example in notes.

Validity

The degree to which evidence and theory support the interpretations of the test scores; need sound scientific base for the proposed score interpretations; tests can be used/interpreted in more than one way and each way must be validated

Sampling error

The difference between the sample statistic and the population parameter; the degree to which your sample results do not accurately reflect the population reality

Construct validity

The extent to which there is evidence that a test measures a particular hypothetical construct; Researchers look for evidence based on test content, response processes (how did the participant answer--was the answer based on the construct being measured or something else? For example, on mathematical reasoning test, did the participant demonstrate math reasoning or simply utilize a memorized algorithm? On a test to measure extroversion and introversion, were the responses influenced by social conformity?)

Number of Variables Studied

The mor variables you study, the more subjects you need.

Power

The power of your results is directly and positively related to sample size and homogeneity of sample; The higher the power, the greater faith you have in failing to reject the null (i.e., your nonsignificant results become more important)

predictive validity

The success with which a test predicts the behavior it is designed to predict; it is assessed by computing the correlation between test scores and the criterion behavior. (Fits under test-criterion relationship and evidence based on relations to other variables)

Correlation does not imply causation!!!

True experimental design is needed to demonstrate causation.

Logistic Regression

Typically dichotomous DV with multiple IV with fewer assumptions and odd ratio results; Involving outcomes that are categorical. The dependent/criterion variable only has two values - the occurrence or nonoccurrence of an event (or presence/absence of a condition) typically coded 0, 1. The independent/predictive variables can be continuous, ordinal or categorical.

Discriminant function analysis

Typically dichotomous DV with multiple IV; Is used to determine which variables discriminate between two or more naturally occurring groups. Discriminant function analysis is multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) reversed. In MANOVA, the independent variables are the groups and the dependent variables are the predictors. In DA, the independent variables are the predictors and the dependent variables are the groups. As previously mentioned, DA is usually used to predict membership in naturally occurring groups. It answers the question: can a combination of variables be used to predict group membership? Usually, several variables are included in a study to see which ones contribute to the discrimination between groups.

Sensitivity of measurement

Use a measure that has the possibility of showing relationships; Consider everything that contributes to the variability; Established standardized instruments may be less sensitive to specific DV in the study.

Intervening or mediating variables

Variables inside the individual (such as thoughts, feelings, or psychological responses) that come between the stimulus and a response). Not measured, but helpful in explaining why something is happening.

latent variable

Variables which aren't directly observed, but inferred by responses to a number of other variables that serve as indicators (e.g. extraversion, intelligence)

Conceptual definition

What the researcher is trying to measure, the abstract concept, what the concept really is, really means

Collinearity

When IVs are highly related. For multiple regression, there is the assumption that IVs are NOT highly related.

Disproportionate stratified sampling

When you purposefully tweak the proportionate representation of a specific variable in your sample. For example, if you want to compare gender differences between teachers, you may need to use diproportionate stratified sample to get enough males in your sample (50/50) even though there are many more female teachers than males in the population.

Mixed design

a design with within subjects factor and between subjects factor

Research problem statement

a single sentence that indicates in general language what will be researched

multiple regression

a statistical technique that predicts values of one variable on the basis of two or more other variables; The great value of multiple regression is in the ability to predict one score based on multiple other scores; In multiple regression, an independent variable is often called a predictor and the dependent variable is called the criterion. Ideally, the IVs are independent of one another, although this is seldom completely true. When IVs correlate, it is said that there is multicollinearity, or just collinearity. Example:

Correlation matrix

a table presenting the correlations among several variables

Mediator variable in a path model

a variable that serves as BOTH a source variable and a result variable; it affects AND is affected by other variables in the model

generalizability theory

an alternate view of reliability, where reliability is seen as a characteristic of the use of the test scores, rather than a property of the scores themselves; attempts to answer the question: "in what situations/conditions is this test reliable?"; examines sources of consistency and inconsistency in test scores (using ANOVA) and attempts to identify and label any systematic sources of error or interactions between error sources; considers the use of the test across different settings looking at systematic error; not looking for overall reliability; will say that the test is reliable in these specific settings and these specific populations

Path analysis models

an extension of multiple regression in that it involves various multiple regression models or equations that are estimated simultaneously; can be used to examine mediation effects; can be used to examine causal hypotheses between IV and DV

parametric tests

assume a normal distribution, selection of participant is independent, data must represent interval and ratio scale, have more power than non parametric tests

SEM is sometimes called...

causal modeling covariance structure analysis path analysis

Single subject design

experimental design, but not group data

construct underrepresentation

failure to capture important components of a construct; part of the construct is not covered by the measure

Measurement error

hypothetical difference between observed score and true/universe score; random and unpredictable


Conjuntos de estudio relacionados

Wk 2 Fundamentals: CH 7, Maternal Child Nursing Care- Chapter 28, Ch 8 Fund/Review Questions- Caring for Patients w/ Chronic Illness Wk 2, Ch 11 Fund-Review Questions/ Developmental Theories Wk 3, Ch 11 Fund- Developmental Theories Wk 3, week 2 Mater...

View Set

NCLEX STYLE REVIEW QUESTIONS FOR NURSE PROCESS, LEGAL, PROFESSIONALISM, AND ETHICS

View Set

Chapter 7: PTSD, dissociative disorders, and somatic symptom disorders

View Set

Soc Sci Intro + Section 1: Physical Properties of Water (4-9)

View Set