Business Law

Interactive Data Corp. hired Foley as an assistant product manager, and over the next six years Interactive steadily promoted him. Interactive officers repeatedly told Foley that he would have his job as long as his performance was adequate. They also distributed an employee handbook that specified termination guidelines that included a mandatory seven-step pre-termination procedure. Foley learned that his supervisor was under investigation by the FBI, and he told Interactive officers. Shortly thereafter, Interactive fired Foley. He sued, claiming that Interactive could only fire him for good cause, after the seven-step procedure. Who wins?

Foley wins because he and Interactive had a bilateral, express employment contract that incorporated the seven steps

Chef Jacquie is scheduled to teach a cooking class to three students. The class tuition is $1,100 per student. In the class each student cooks a French meal under Jacquie's expert supervision, and receives a cookbook (worth $30) and a cooking pan (worth $150). Tory, one of the students, tells Jacquie the day before the class that she will be unable to attend and requests a refund. Jacquie denies the refund and Tory sues. Tory claims that the UCC should govern the contract, and Jacquie argues that it should be covered by the common law. Who is right?

Jacquie, because the class is primarily a service.

Mrs. Martin tells some neighborhood kids that she will pay $100 if any of them mows her lawn. Jake goes to a hardware store and purchases a lawnmower for $60, and then mows Mrs. Martin's lawn. Jake has entered into what types of contract?

Jake has made a unilateral contract with Mrs. Martin and a bilateral contract with the hardware store.

Olivia agrees that she will bring Desiree a cherry pie every Monday for a month in exchange for $15 per week. Olivia delivers a pie to Desiree for four weeks, and Desiree pays her each time. Olivia continues to deliver Desiree pies every Monday, and Olivia continues to pay, for another five weeks. On the tenth week, Olivia brings a pie and Desiree refuses to pay. Olivia sues for payment. What result?

Olivia will win. The court will rule that they had an implied contract

While George travels for two months, Mary agrees to house and care for George's three horses at her stables. The parties agree that Mary will pick up the horses on the first day of George's trip and George will pay Mary when he returns. George returns home from his travels and finds that Mary never picked up the horses. George sues. What result?

The court will apply common law and Mary will lose.

For the past seven years, Sommerset Storage, Inc. has hired Mountbattan Tax Associates to prepare its annual tax return. This year the parties agree to their usual $1,000 fee, but Mountbatten finds a loophole in the tax code and gets Sommerset a return four times the usual amount. Mountbattan then requests that Sommerset pay $4,000 to reflect the increased tax returns. There is nothing in their contract about increased fees, but Mountbatten argues it would be unjust for Sommerset not to pay extra. Sommerset refuses and Mountbatten sues. What result?

The court will uphold the original contract and Mountbatten will lose.

While negotiating with Stewart to purchase his house, Yasmine asks him about the condition of the roof. "Excellent," he replies. "It is only 2 years old, and should last 25 more." In fact, Stewart knows that the roof is 26 years old and has had a series of leaks. The parties sign a sales contract for $600,000. A week before Yasmine is to pay for the house and take possession, she discovers the leaks and learns that a new roof will cost $35,000. What kind of contract exists between Yasmine and Stewart?

Voidable by Yasmine

Central Maine Power Co. (CMPC) made a promotional offer in which it promised to pay a substantial sum to any homeowner or builder who constructed new housing with electric heat. To qualify for the offer, Motel Services, Inc. (MSI) decided to install electrical heat in a housing project it was constructing in Waterville, Maine. MSI built the units and requested payment for the full amount of the promotional offer. Is CMPC obligated to pay? Why or why not?

Yes, CMPC is obligated to pay, because this was a unilateral contract and MSI performed.

Riley, age 16, and Samuel, age 36, enter into a contract in which Riley will sell Samuel his car for $11,000. The next day, Samuel decides he no longer wants the car and tries to get out of the contract. Samuel argues that because Riley is a minor, the contract is void. If Riley wants to enforce the contract, will he be able to?

Yes, the contract is voidable and only Riley can cancel it.

The Hoffmans owned and operated a successful small bakery. Lukowitz, an agent of Red Owl Stores, told them that for $18,000, Red Owl would build a store and fully stock it for them to operate. The Hoffmans sold their bakery and purchased a lot on which Red Owl was to build the store. Lukowitz then told the Hoffmans that the price had gone up to $26,000. The Hoffmans borrowed the extra money from relatives, but then Lukowitz informed them that the cost would be $34,000. Negotiations broke off and the Hoffmans sued. The court determined that there was no contract. Can the Hoffmans recover any money?

Yes. They can most likely recover damages based on promissory estoppel