Critical Thinking

Pataasin ang iyong marka sa homework at exams ngayon gamit ang Quizwiz!

Disagreeing

"That's not true." "I don't think so." "Actually" "I think..."

Confirms, false and true

(Universal) A,E (All and No) Confirms or false (Particular) I,O (Some and Some Not) Proves true

Premise Indicators

-Because -The reason is? -But and and (show multiple premises) First, second, third, Finally...

Adding (agree and adding)

-Can be same or new topic "I don't think so either" I know how you feel..

Subcontraries (across bottom)

-Can both be true but no both false.

INDUCTIVE

-Claim to be strong not valid -can be strong or weak (Inductive, in strong, in weak)

Subalternation

-Down the sides *Truth flows down *False flows up false floats up Truth sinks down

DEDUCTIVE

-Have strongest claim: validity Not all are valid.

Contradiction (Diagonal)

-One always true the other always false.

ContrApOsition

-Switch and negate (opposite) -only valid for A and O (All and Some Not)

ConvErsIon

-Switches the subject and predicate. -only valid for E and I (No and Some)

Conclusion Indicators

-This is evident that... -Hence -therefore -It obviously follows that... -So, -Thus -Consequently

Observation

-Valid for all forms -Changes All to No or -Changes Some to Some Not

Contraries (across top)

-can both be false but not both true.

To determine the conclusion

1. Find the indicator word 2. Is the indicator a conclusion or primes indicator -Generally indicators point forward or can be in the middle of the statement.

Square set up

A (All)........................... E (No) I (Some)...................... O (Some Not) Universal on top Particular on bottom

Universal Forms

A and E (All and No)

Cogent

A strong inductive argument with TRUE premises. Cogent=strong+True premises UNcogent=weak or false premises

Validity

A valid argument is such that if the premises were true then the conclusion would also be true. (Premises MAKE the conclusion true. Even if the premises are NOT true.) ARGUMENT CAN BE VALID AS LONG AS THE REASONING IS LOGICAL. ALL or nothing, no degrees of validity.

Form A

All

Challenging (Asking for justification WITHOUT disagreeing)

Asking for the reason.... What evidence/reason.... What makes you think... How do you know.... Can you give me a reason... Why would you think that...

Clarifying (asking that the speaker make the claim more precise)

Asking what do you mean by... I've never heard of.... Do you mean A or do you mean B? What exactly do you mean? I really have no idea what you are talking about.

What is an argument?

Consists of one or more statements (premises) which are claimed (inferential claim) to be an objectively good reason to believe another statement (conclusion).

Disjunctive Statements

Contain "or" A or B.

Disagrees with the conclusion

Disagrees with the conclusion

Disagrees with the conditional premise

Disagrees with the first premise

Disagrees with the Other premise

Disagrees with the second premise

Particular Forms

I and O (Some and Some Not)

Hypothetical Syllogism

If A then B*. If B* then C. If A then C. And If A* then B. If C then A*. If C then B.

Modus Ponens

If A then B. A. B. Invalid: If A, then B. B.** A.**

Modus Tollens

If A then B. Not B. Not A. Invalid If A then B. Not A.** Not B.**

Invalid Hypothetical Syllogism

If A* then B. If A* then C. If B then C. and If A then B*. If C then B*. If A then C. The A and B can not line up on first two lines.

ARGUMENTS

Inductive -Weak -strong *cognet Deductive -invalidity -Valid *Sound

All arguments are divided into two groups:

Inductive and deductive

Strong

Is such that the truth if the premises makes the conclusion PROBABLY true. -Can have degrees of Strength.

Weak

Is such that the truth of the premises DOES NOT make the conclusion likely to be true. -Can have degrees of weakness

Commits the circumstantial Fallacy

Makes issue of personal motives

Commits the Fallacy of Abuse

Name calling

Form E

No

A single Particular example that mathces

Proves true

QUIZ 1

QUIZ 1

QUIZ 2

QUIZ 2

QUIZ 4 Logical forms A,E,I,O

QUIZ 4

QUIZ 5 Conversion, Contraposition, Observation

QUIZ 5

QUIZ 6 Square of Opposition

QUIZ 6

QUIZ 7

QUIZ 7

QUIZ 8 Responding to arguments

QUIZ 8

QUIZ 3

Quiz 3

Invalidity

Regardless of truth an argument can still be invalid. Invalidity means faulty reasoning.

Form I

Some

Form O

Some NOT

Sound vs Cognet

Sound=valid+true premiseS unsound=invalid or false premise Cogent=strong+True premises UNcogent=weak or false premises

A deductive argument cannot be almost valid.

True

A deductive argument cannot be half valid

True

All cogent arguments are strong.

True

All sound arguments have a true conclusion

True

All sound arguments have true premises.

True

An Argument's being sound implies that it is valid.

True

An argument must have 2 or more premises.

True

An argument with all true premises and a false conclusion cannot be valid

True

An argument's being invalid implies that it is sound.

True

An argument's being invalid implies that it is unsound

True

An argument's being sound implies that it is valid

True

Arguments with false conclusions are never sound.

True

Cogent inductive arguments have true premises.

True

Deductive arguments are either valid or invalid

True

Every argument makes an inferential claim.

True

False sentences are statements.

True

If all premises are true and the conclusions is false, then the argument cannot be valid.

True

If an argument is strong and has true premises, then the conclusion is probably true.

True

If an argument is uncogent but strong, then it must have false premises.

True

If an argument is weak then it cannot be cogent.

True

Some inductive arguments are stronger than others.

True

Some inductive arguments are weaker than others

True

Some inductive arguments are weaker than others.

True

Some inferential claims are false.

True

Some valid arguments have false conclusions.

True

The conclusion of a strong argument with true premises will be probably true.

True

The difference between an inductive and a deductive argument is in the kind of inferential claim they make.

True

The inferential claim of an inductive argument is that the conclusion is probably true given the premises.

True

if an argument is valid and has true premises, then the conclusion cannot be false.

True

An argument must have at least one premise.

True (An argument must have one or more premises.)

A valid argument would be unsound if it had false premises.

True (Having false premises in one way to be unsound. Unsound=invalid or has at least one false premise.)

If an argument is uncogent and has true premises, then it must be weak.

True (If it were strong with true premises it would be cogent.)

The conclusion of a valid argument with true premises will be true.

True (That's basically what "valid" means)

All invalid arguments are unsound.

True Unsound=invalid or false

Unsound

When an argument is invalid and/or has at least one false premise unsound=invalid or false premise

Sound arguments

When an argument is valid AND has true premises. Sound=valid+true premiseS

Premises

claims that are to be objectively good reason to believe another statement (the conclusion)

A single Universal example that matches only

confirms.

A single Universal form that states the opposite proves

false

Inferential claim

is usually implicit (implied) rather than explicit (stated). No inferential claim, no argument

Deductive arguments are either valid or invalid.

true

Some inferential claims are false

true

Sound deductive arguments always have true conclusions.

true


Kaugnay na mga set ng pag-aaral

Corporate Finance Practice Problems

View Set

Jackson and the Age of the Common Man/ Age of Democracy

View Set

Marketing Final Exam Review (Multiple Choice)

View Set

National Electrical Code (NEC) Article 220.

View Set

chapter 15 - advertising and public relations

View Set