Miranda Warning

The Miranda warning must be giving during any stop.

False

The miranda warning must be giving during lineups, show-ups and photographic identifications

False

The U.S. surpeme court established the right to counsel during police interrogation for all criminal suspects in

Miranda vs. Arizona

The Miranda warning must be given to a suspect interrogated in police custody, defined as when the suspect is:

Not free to leave

The fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination comes into play

only at trial

The Miranda warning must be given

only to those suspects interrogated in the custody of police

Which of the following statement would probably constitute an invocation of Miranda rights?

Im done talking to you

A wavier of Miranda is valid even if the suspect thought the questioning was going to be about minor crime and the questioning switched to a more serious crime.

True

The precendent case for analyzing confessions issues is Miranda v. Arizona

True

The soft Miranda warning recited less harshly and directly than is imprinted on most Miranda cards is permissiable if all 4 warnings are adequately conveyed to the suspect

True

The only unincorporated right guaranteed by the 5th amendment is the right to:

a grand jury indictment

No Miranda warning is required if there is no seizure of the person as long the police do not:

convey the message that compliance is required

In Re Gault assured juveniles

due process in the legal system

In which scenario would Miranda warning be required

suspect in custody for unrelated offense