Miranda Warning
The Miranda warning must be giving during any stop.
False
The miranda warning must be giving during lineups, show-ups and photographic identifications
False
The U.S. surpeme court established the right to counsel during police interrogation for all criminal suspects in
Miranda vs. Arizona
The Miranda warning must be given to a suspect interrogated in police custody, defined as when the suspect is:
Not free to leave
The fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination comes into play
only at trial
The Miranda warning must be given
only to those suspects interrogated in the custody of police
Which of the following statement would probably constitute an invocation of Miranda rights?
Im done talking to you
A wavier of Miranda is valid even if the suspect thought the questioning was going to be about minor crime and the questioning switched to a more serious crime.
True
The precendent case for analyzing confessions issues is Miranda v. Arizona
True
The soft Miranda warning recited less harshly and directly than is imprinted on most Miranda cards is permissiable if all 4 warnings are adequately conveyed to the suspect
True
The only unincorporated right guaranteed by the 5th amendment is the right to:
a grand jury indictment
No Miranda warning is required if there is no seizure of the person as long the police do not:
convey the message that compliance is required
In Re Gault assured juveniles
due process in the legal system
In which scenario would Miranda warning be required
suspect in custody for unrelated offense