Interpersonal Comm Final
reactance theory
how individuals react when their freedom to choose is restricted.
manifestations of jealousy
Cognitive- Suspicious thoughts, worries Emotional- Feeling sad, fearful Behavioral- Confronting other, questioning partner
conflict styles (CACAC)
Competing, avoiding, collaborating, comprimising, accomodating
Communication Stages of Disengaging Relationships
Differentiating Disintegrating Stagnating Terminating
explanations for jealousy
Evolutionary perspective Adaptive significance Paternity confidence (male jealousy) Mate selection (female jealousy) Self-evaluation maintenance theory Occurs when comparisons are made Comparisons on important dimensions
Dialectical Tensions in Relationship Breakup
Termination vs. continued connection Initiator vs. caretaker Openness vs. closedness
committed relationship types
Traditional (about 20%) Independent (about 22%) Separate (about 17%) What about the other 40%?
value stage
attachment due to value/belief similarity
stimulus stage
attraction to physical appearance
P variables
attributes of person evaluating the other includes: expectations, social skills
O variables
attributes of the person being evaluated includes: physical attractiveness, personality
E variables
attributes of the physical and social environment includes: proximity, pleasantness
cross complaining
both partners are complaining, one about a and the other about b, so they never solve one problem but complain about both
role stage
commitment due to successful performance of relationship roles
components of conflict
communicative acts of each person meanings the two have for their relationship meanings attatched to these acts by each person
2 types of conflict
content, relationship
sources of conflict
control over resources, preferences and nuisances, values, beliefs, nature of the relationship
gottman's 3 patterns that predict divorce
criticism, defensiveness, contempt, stonewalling
early stages: unproductive conflict communication
cross complaining, negative climates
social groups shape the meaning of behaviors with
cultural differences, social communities
conflict definition
disagreement among or between connected individuals when people who depend on each other express different views, interest or goals they percieve as opposing
responses to conflict
exit, neglect, loyalty, voice
attributions
explanations for why something happened
Barriers that can increase attraction
external barriers, barriers within the relationship
behavioral independence
frequent, strong, diverse, enduring
couple types
hostile/engaged hostile/detached
Knapp's interaction theory
initiating, experimenting, intensifying, integrating, bonding
need fulfillment
intimacy, being nurturing, assistance, reassurance of own worth
middle stages: unproductive conflict communication
kitchen sinking, frequent interruptions
Adjudication
litigation, lawyers, judges are important. Third party makes decisions for the couple. members of the couple lose some power, a competitive process, a win lose mentality
principles of conflict
natural, covert/overt, passive agression
divorce mediation
neutral third party helps couple resolve differences. transition from one form of the relationship to a new one, mediator helps partners participate in negotiation to create desirable outcome for both parties.
assumptions of divorce mediation
people make better decisions for themselves than do outsiders, people are more likely to abide by rules they helped to create, trained mediators are necessary to help, both parties must assume responsibility for failed marriage
distress maintaining attributions
positive behaviors are external, negative are internal
relationship enhancing attributions
positive behaviors are internal, negative behaviors are external
relational culture
privately developed and executed system of understandings that coordinate attitudes, actions, and identities of partners
magic 5:1 ratio
ratio of positive to negative interactions positively expressed by showing interest, being affectionate, thoughtful, etc.
social exchange model of relationship development
rewards and costs, expectations, alternatives, investments
characteristics of individuals in relational cultures
richness, efficiency, uniqueness, pacing, openness, spontaneity, evaluation
indicators of relational culture
rules, personalized language
theories of relational development
stage, social exchange theory, dialectical theory
Stimulus value role theory of relational development
stimulus stage, value stage, role stage
factors affecting conflict
time, gender, children
Gottman's 3 styles of successful couples
validating, avoiding, volatile
P x O variables
variables that are unique to the relationship between O and P similarity between P and O Complementary between P and O reciprocal liking
self serving bias
your motives are good, theirs are bad
jealousy
An aversive emotional experience characterized by feelings of anger, sadness, and fear, induced by the threat or actual loss of a relationship to a real or imagined rival
cohabitation
Has increased 900% in the past 50 years 70% of women aged 30-34 have cohabitated 2/3 of marriages occur among couples who cohabitated Predicted by length of time in the relationship Differences according to education
Relational power
Weaker, less involved partner induce jealousy in other Effort to gain power in the relationship
constructive conflict comm
early stages middle- bracketing later- contradicting
functions of relational culture
establish boundaries between us and others regularizes our intentions
later stages: unproductive conflict communication
excessive meta communication