Chapter 6

Based on the law of products liability, which of the following is correct? A) A manufacturer should design its products to take into account foreseeable misuse. B) A manufacturer should design its products to take into account all possible misuse. C) A manufacturer should design its products to take into account all possible misuse by the initial purchaser, but need not worry about misuse by other users. D) A manufacturer need only take into account the intended use of its products.

A

) In considering whether a product contains a defective design, the courts will consider the following except: A) the degree of danger posed by the design B) the profitability of the product C) the likelihood of injury D) the social utility of the product E) the cost of producing a safer design

B

Pat is pledging at the Delta Upsilon Delta (DUD) fraternity in order to become a member. As part of his initiation, he must eat a piece of cheese that is on a mousetrap that has been set to trap a mouse. He tries, but the trap slams shut on his nose, injuring him. Pat files a products liability suit against the hardware store which sold the mousetrap to the fraternity members. Which of the following, if true, would allow the hardware store to avoid liability? A) The store exercised reasonable care in selling the mousetrap. B) It was an unforeseeable misuse for anyone to use a mousetrap in this way. C) Any defect in the mousetrap was caused by the manufacturer, not the hardware store. D) Pat was not the purchaser from the hardware store.

B

Which of the following is correct with regard to the crashworthiness doctrine? A) Car manufacturers should make cars with a minimal chance of being involved in an accident. B) Car manufacturers should make cars that are designed so that the risk of injury arising from striking the interior of the car in an accident is minimized. C) Car dealers should train car buyers in order to minimize their chances of being involved in an accident. D) Car manufacturers should design cars to minimize their repair costs in the event of an accident.

B

Which of the following is not a commonly recognized defense in product liability? A) government contractor defense B) state of the art design C) correction of the defect D) assumption of the risk E) unforeseeable misuse of the product

B

Which of the following is not a defect in manufacture? A) failure to properly assemble the product B) failure to properly package the product C) failure to properly test the product D) failure to properly check the quality of the product

B

A seller is being sued by a buyer under a strict liability theory for having sold a defective widget. Which of the following facts would not be beneficial to the seller's defense? A) The seller was not engaged in the business of selling widgets. B) The widget had been altered after the seller sold it. C) The seller had taken all steps possible to ensure a safe product. D) The product was not unreasonably dangerous.

C

Carl wants to recover in a products liability lawsuit because of a couch that he bought. He must prove the following except: A) that the product caused the injury B) that he in fact was injured C) that he had a contractual relationship with the manufacturer D) that the injury resulted from a defect in the product

C

If a manufacturer produces a defective product, sells it to a wholesaler, who sells it to a retailer, who sells it to a consumer, who is injured, which parties in the chain of distribution are potentially liable under strict liability? A) only the manufacturer B) only the manufacturer and wholesaler C) the manufacturer, wholesaler, and retailer D) only the party at fault

C

Which of the following is true in a products liability case? A) The plaintiff must prove the existence of a duty. B) The plaintiff must have purchased the product from the defendant. C) The plaintiff must prove her case with a preponderance of the evidence. D) The plaintiff will lose if she cannot prove proximate causation.

C

A wholesale distributor who is named in a product liability suit based on strict liability could avoid liability if: A) the plaintiff had not purchased the product causing the injury B) the distributor exercised reasonable care in all ways with respect to the product causing the injury C) this product had been used for many years by other users without injury D) this defect which caused the injury occurred after the product left the distributor E) the product has been redesigned to eliminate the problem which caused the injury in this case

D

As Betty is riding her new "LogLeaper XRTSHX 10,000 GTI" mountain bike, the front axle breaks and she is injured. She decides to sue Generalized, the maker of the bike, after learning that all LogLeapers have this problem. She would most likely sue on the basis of: A) negligence in assembly B) failure to warn C) manufacturing defect D) design defect E) defect in packaging

D

Barry buys a new sports car. The car sits low to the ground and because of the styling, visibility, to the rear is limited. About a month after Barry has the car he backs over his pet poodle as he is leaving for work. In his strict liability suit against the car manufacturer, Barry will: A) win because driving a sports car is an inherently dangerous activity B) win on the basis of design defect C) win on the basis of packaging defect because the car could have been packaged in a differently styled body D) lose because he assumed the risk of backing up in a car when he could not see to the rear E) lose because he is not in privity of contract with the car manufacturer

D

In order for the government contractor defense to apply, the following must be present except: A) the government set precise specifications for the product B) the product conformed to the government specification C) the contractor warned the government of any known defects or dangers D) the contractor presented the government with a proposed safer design for the product E) all four of the above must be proven in order for the defense to apply

D

Little Bobby, 5 years old, finds his older brother's "Extendo Sword," which is a toy sword about a foot long which springs out to 5 feet long when a button is pushed on the handle. His mother tells him to put it down because he will hurt someone if he's not careful. Bobby pushes the button when the sword is pointed toward his face and, just as all properly functioning "Extendo Swords" do, the sword shoots out. Bobby is injured and, under products liability, sues the toy store which sold the toy. Bobby will most likely: A) lose because of contributory negligence by playing with the sword after being told not to B) lose if he cannot prove negligence on the part of the toy store C) win on the basis of a manufacturing defect D) win on the basis of a design defect E) lose if the defendant can show that the sword was a state-of-the-art design

D

Which of the following could not give rise to a strict liability in tort action for products liability? A) buying a new car from a Genard Motors dealer B) buying food at a Joke-in-the-Box restaurant C) buying a prescription which was filled in a drug store D) buying legal services for the drafting of a will

D

Dangerous Products, Inc. is currently the defendant in several products liability cases. Which of the following situations would provide the weakest defense for the manufacturer? A) The plaintiff had received a recall notice addressing the defect which caused the injury, but did not respond to the recall and continued to use the product. B) The plaintiff was misusing the product, an electric sander, to remove the outer layer of his facial skin in order to improve his facial complexion. C) The plaintiff had taken one of the company's lawn mowers and modified it to be a ceiling fan which he attached to his bedroom ceiling. D) The injury occurred when a boy used a drill to drill a hole in his younger brother's arm because the younger brother had broken the older brother's toy car. E) The plaintiff was misusing an electric wood saw because the owner's manual said to only use it to cut with (along) the grain of the wood and the plaintiff was using it to cut across the grain, causing it to kick up and injure the plaintiff.

E

Irma bought a new Zenith car from the Zenith dealership. As Irma was driving it, one of the wheels fell off, causing the car to crash and Irma to be injured. It can be shown that the manufacturer negligently attached the wheel to the axle. Irma wants to sue the Zenith manufacturer. Under which of the following causes of action can Irma sue the dealership? A) breach of warranty of merchantability B) negligence C) strict liability D) A, B, and C E) A and C only

E

Someone who is injured by a product that he/she purchased new could recover on the basis of: A) breach of warranty B) breach of warranty or negligence C) breach of warranty or strict liability D) negligence or strict liability E) breach of warranty, negligence, or strict liability

E

What are sellers responsible to provide for regarding the assembly of products they sell? A) rebates B) adequate instructions for safe assembly C) adequate instructions for use of the product D) A and B E) B and C

E

Which of the following best describes a defect in packaging under products liability? A) The packaging of a product, such as a bottle or can, causes an injury to the user. B) The packaging of a product is such that it allows the product to spoil. C) The packaging of a product contains misleading or deceptive information about the product contained inside. D) The packaging of a product fails to contain necessary warnings about the dangers associated with a product. E) The packaging of a product allows children to access a product, such as drugs or poisons, that is generally safe when used as directed, but can be harmful if not used properly.

E

When a product is found to be defective because of a failure to warn, it means: A) that the manufacturer made an unreasonably dangerous product about which consumers should have been told B) that the product would not have been unreasonably dangerous if consumers had been warned about certain dangers of the product C) a state of the art design is accepted so long as consumers are warned that there are no safer designs available D) that the manufacturer did not meet its duty to warn against all possible dangers that might exist in connection with a product

B

A public policy reason for imposing strict product liability on all in the chain of distribution is which of the following? A) These parties are able to insure against product liability costs. B) These parties should be punished for putting dangerous products on the market. C) Consumers should be able to choose dangerous products if they want to. D) Negligence was making it too easy for plaintiffs to recover.

A

Justin buys a computer from a retailer and his son is injured when the glass on the monitor shatters while he is using it. He sues the wholesaler only and the jury determines that this was a manufacturing defect that existed when the computer left the factory and caused the son's injury. The jury determined that the wholesaler was only 5-percent responsible, the retailer 20-percent, and the manufacturer 75-percent. Justin can: A) recover the full amount of his damages from the wholesaler B) recover only 5 percent of his damages from the wholesaler C) recover 20 percent from the retailer, but none from the parties he did not deal with D) not recover because he (the son) was not the one who bought the computer

A

Power Tool Company manufactures table saws. These saws have several safety devices including a permanent blade guard. This guard keeps the user's hands from touching the blade while it is moving. Ralph buys a Power table saw, but he takes off the blade guard because it inhibits the type of work he wants to do. Later, Ralph is injured while using the saw. If the blade guard had been left on, Ralph would not have been injured. Ralph sues Power Tool Co. under a strict liability theory. The best defense that Power could raise based on these facts is: A) supervening event B) assumption of risk C) generally known dangers D) state of the art E) misuse of the product

A

The doctrine that imposes liability on a seller of a product only if the seller sold the defective product directly to the injured party is known as: A) privity of contract B) resolution of contractual relationships C) doctrine of direct commercial contacts D) doctrine of merchants' liability limitations

A

What is the significance of a "defect" in a products liability case based on strict liability? A) It is not necessary, but can be used to eliminate the need to prove that there was an injury. B) It is a required element in the proof of such a case. C) Its presence would allow punitive damages to be awarded. D) Its presence would eliminate liability for the defendant. E) The party who caused the defect is the only one who can be held liable.

B

In order to recover in a products liability case based on strict liability, the plaintiff must prove that the product had a defect: A) that was caused by the defendant B) of any type C) that made the product unreasonably dangerous D) that affected the value of the product E) that the defendant knew existed

C

JKL, Inc. manufactures small appliances, including toasters. JKL learns that its toasters are defective and might cause serious harm to a user. Which of the following statements is not true? A) JKL must make a reasonable effort to notify purchasers and users of this defect. B) JKL must correct the defect. C) If a user gets a notice of the defect, but continues to use the product without having it repaired or replaced, and is subsequently injured, JKL is probably still liable for the injury. D) One reasonable way to notify purchasers of the defect is by mail.

C

Paul purchased a deluxe motor home from Wide Open Spaces Motor Homes. In a products liability suit against Wide Open Spaces Motor Homes Corporation, Paul must show which of the following in order to recover? A) Wide Open Spaces was the manufacturer of the motor home, and not just a dealer. B) The negligence of Wide Open Spaces led to Paul's injury. C) A "defect" made the motor home unreasonably dangerous, leading to an injury. D) Paul was not misusing the motor home when the injury occurred. E) The motor home was new when Paul purchased it.

C

Sean has a 6-year-old car which he bought 2 years ago directly from its original owner. Eight months ago he received a recall notice about a safety problem with the brakes. He never responded to the notice. Yesterday Sean was driving when the brakes failed and caused him to strike and injure a pedestrian. Which of the following is true in lawsuits against the car's manufacturer? A) The pedestrian cannot recover due to the fact that the pedestrian was not using the car. B) Sean can recover despite having received the recall notice. C) The pedestrian cannot recover because the correction of a defect defense will apply even though Sean did not take the car in for the repair. D) Neither party can recover if Sean's car was one of only a few of these cars that actually had a brake defect. E) The pedestrian could not recover due to assumption of the risk.

C

Under the judicial philosophies developed in the area of product liability: A) it does not pay to sue because of the high cost of legal expenses B) the doctrine of privity of contract will prevent liability C) the doctrine of privity of contract has been greatly reduced in importance D) most consumers cannot recover because the UCC has been written to protect merchants

C

Which of the following best describes the defense of correction of a defect? A) The defense applies if a product is redesigned such that future production does not contain the defect. B) The defense applies only if the particular sample of the item was repaired, thus fixing the defect. C) The defense applies in a situation where a user received a recall notice to correct the defect but did not comply with the notice. D) It applies only if the manufacturer replaces the defective product at no additional charge to the owner.

C

Which of the following is true about statutes of limitation and statutes of repose? A) Statutes of limitation, but not statutes of repose, set time limits on bringing legal actions. B) Neither type of statute applies in the event of serious injuries. C) These statutes are federal law and apply nationwide even to state law actions. D) A statute of repose requires that a claim be brought within the specified number of years that the product was originally sold.

D

Which of the following would be a supervening event from the standpoint of a car manufacturer that has been sued in strict liability for an injury caused by one of its cars? A) A redesign of the particular model car such that the ones being currently manufactured do not have the defect which led to the injury. B) A recall notice sent to the car owner which was ignored. C) An enactment, after the date of the injury, of a new safety regulation that would have prevented the injury. D) The fact that the defect was caused by the car dealer when the car dealer was installing accessories for the purchaser.

D

Who can recover for their injuries under product liability law? A) someone who purchases a product new B) someone who uses a product with the owner's permission C) a nonuser such as a bystander D) A and B only E) A, B, and C

E