Econ 101 Final
Competitive mergers
Bad for rivals but good for consumers
Beat
Bama
Supply side ultimately
Be far from competitor. Increase market power and prices. Increase profit margin
For bank accounts and Implicit
Calculate the interest but don't use money invested
Make benefits and costs
Can remove middle man. But lose benefits like vertical integration and blunt incentives
perfect price discrimination
Charging exactly the reservation price to charge highest price and make every sale
Best response in game theory is
Choice that yields highest payoff riven other players choices
Moral hazard
Choices you make when you returns actions aren't fully observable
Simultaneous game
Choose without knowing other players choice
Non price competition
Compete to win costumers by differentiating your product and positioning it differently
Price competition
Compete to win customers via lower prices
Multiple equilibrium can occur jn
Coordination and anti coord games
Demand side strategies to battle entry
Create customer lock in
focal point
Cue from outside game that helps you coordinate. Like lunch ar noon example
Relationship specific investments are more valuable when
Current business relationship continues
Set your price via what curve
Demand curve. Look up for price and down for quantity
Competition yields production when
Demand equals marginal cost
Supply side strategies to combat entry
Develop cost advantages
If price competition is intense you should
Differentiate your product
Adverse selection of sellers
Due to difficulty selling high quality goods, more likely to see low quality goods sold when quality can't be observed
What 2 things are true in nash
Each players choice is best response to expected choice of other and each players expectation is correct
Anti collusion laws
Ensure businesses agree to not compete
imperfect competition
Facing some competitors and or selling products thst differ a little from those competitors
First vs second
First you can be aggressive. Second you can be flexible
Fixed costs and variable costs over time
Fixed spread out and eventually decrease while variable increase over time
What's used to best represent sequential games
Game tree
Example of bargaining power of buyers
Gm buying parts from suppliers
Anti competitive merger
Good for rivals bad for consumers
Conditions for price disc
Have market power, can prevent resale, and can target right prices to right customers
Market with price discrimination quantity and price
Higher quanitty and lower price
Look forward
In games that play out over time you should look forward to anticipate consequences of choices
When isn't cooperation an eq
In one shot or finitely repeated
Product dif reduces
Incentive for rival to undercut you with prices
Hold up problem
One side in a relationship specfiicc investment tries to renegotiate to give other a worse deal
Nash Equilibrium
Outcome where choice each player makes is best response to choices others are playing
Marginal revenue is ultimately
Output minus discount
Principal agent problem
Person is hired to do something on someone's behalf but their actions aren't fully monitornwke
Demand side considerations for positioning
Position good to be attractive to as many customers as possible. Aka be close to your rival
Supply side considerations
Position to be as different from competitors as possible
Short run economic profit
Production capacity and number of competitors can't change
Price competition is easier when
Products are extremely similar, prices are easily observed, and switching costs are low
Market power allows you to
Pursue independent pricing strategies
In the long run, free entry
Pushes economic profits down to 0
If price competition is subdued
Put yourself as close to rival as possible
Backward induction solution
Reason backward to solve sequential games and find eq
Ways to beat hold up
Reputation and repeated interactions. Vertical integration
Five forces framework
Reveals sources of profitibility and threats to it
Output effect
Revenue increase from selling one more unit
Discount effect
Revenue loss from cutting price on all units sold
Accounting profit
Revenue minus explicit costs
Long run profit
Rivals can increase or decrease production and leave or enter
Assyemtric info and sellers
Sellers of high quality goods don't sell but low do
Solutions to adverse selection of buyers
Sellers use info related to costs, offer different contracts and govt
Segment your marekt
Separate market into groups whose demand differs then target those groups differently
Key to price discrimination
Set prices close to and just below someone's marginal benefit
Why does marginal revenue curve more sharply than firm demand
Since you lose money the more you sell via discount effect
Substitutes are a big threat when
Switching costs are low
Examples of demand side to keep customers locked in
Switching costs, reputation and loyal costumers, and network effects
Anti corod
Take different but complimentary action for best response
Economic profit
Total revenue minus both explicit and implicit costs
Hold up problem leads to
Underinvestment. As it lowers your desire to do things that would lower your bargaining power and leads rk investments that improve your next best alt instead
Selective discounts help solve
Underproduction problem
Ways to solve coordination problems
Use communication, focal points as well as culture and norms, and laws
Search goods
Use informative advertising and can be easily evaluated before buying
Solutions to adverse selection of sellers
Use third part verifiers, allow sellers to signal quality via things like reviews, and government can force info to be revealed
Strategic plan
Used for indefinitely repeated. List of instructions thst describes how to respond ro any possible situation
Prune the tree
Used to solve game trees. Find beer responses for rival then remove choices they wouldn't make
Strategic interactions
When your best choice may depend on what others choose and when their best choices may depend on what you choose
How should you solve finitely repeated games
Work backward
When advertising, make sure
You increase your firm demand, not market
Grim trigger
start with cooperation; if opponent ever defects, you defect every time thereafter
Bargaining power
Ability to negotiate a new deal. Determined by next best alternative
Failure to cooperate
Agreements to cooperate aren't always credible, eq isn't always best outcome, and temptation to undercut dominates
In a monopoly the market demand curve is
Also the firm demand curve
Perfect competition
Market where everyone sells an identical good with many buyers and sellers. No market power
Natural monopoly
Market where irs cheapest for a single businesses to service the market
Supply side to get special advantages
Mass produce better, research and develop advantages, and have good access to inputs via suppliers to lower average cost and make more profit
Reservation price
Max price someone would pay for a product
Adverse selection of buyers
Mix of buyers is skewed toward high cost buyers making some oeoooe not able to buy products rhey want
Reason backward
Analyze last period of take to find consequences of first action
Profit margin
Average revenue minus average cost
Market power and quantity
Leads to inefficiently smaller quantity
Payoff table
Lists all choices to show possible outcomes
Self selection via hurdle method
Low marginal benefit customers leap hurdle and pay low price while high don't care
Ways to solve moral hazard
Make hidden actions observable via monitoring, provide complements, and use pay for performance
Successful advertising and elasticity
Makes your curve less elastic
monopolistic competition
Many small businesses compete each selling differentiated products. Some market power via differentiated product