Political Science Research Methods Midterm
steps for developing theories of change
1. Issue/goal identification 2. Backward mapping - we trace our intervention and our processes back from the ultimate outcomes that we would like to see while identifying intermediate and immediate outcomes. 3. Identify benchmarks for each outcome in order so we may identify progress. 4. Trace benchmarks to the activities that will produce our desired outcomes and then trace these back to the resources that are present. 5. Identify the causal links that connect resources to programs and results
3 conditions justified true belief must satisfy
1. belief condition 2. truth condition 3. justification condition
3 guidelines the US government bases research on
1. beneficence 2. respect for others 3. justice
logic model characteristics
1. challenges 2. inputs 3. outputs 4. outcomes
casual arguments
1. co-vary 2. follow temporal order 3. specific causal mechanism 4. not spurious
good research question characteristics
1. interesting 2. not already have a definitive answer 3. be testable 4. iterative proves
3 groups of empirical research
1. quantative 2. qualitative 3. mixed-methods
characteristics of the best theories and hypotheses
1. testable 2. generalizable 3. parsimonious 4. good causal arguments
5 factors that dictate research design
Sampling Validity Reliability Bias/Error Ethical Issues
internal validity
ability to establish causality, depends on true randomness of sampling procedures
external validity
ability to generalize
comparison cases
allow us to collect data from more than one situation
respondent validation
allows respondents to view our results before they are released
ethnography
an in-depth data collection and analysis effort about some group of people/phenomena
empirical analysis
analysis of how things actually are in reality
Comprehensive Community Change Initiatives
are used to describe community change initiatives that are focused on making broad-based improvements in stressed communities
logic models
are used to identify the key elements of an issue and look at the linkages between them
normative analysis
based on how things ought to be
inductive reasoning
begin with facts to form theories
deductive reasoning
begin with theories to apply to instances
interpretists
believe that knowledge is socially constructed and situated, making truth imposable to obtain
positivists
believe that world is comprised of realities and truths and the accumulation of evidence will best enable us to understand reality
transparency
clearly articulating our data collection process for public consumption
triangulation
collects information on a single topic from a variety of sources using a variety of methods
etic
conducted by an outside observer, believed to be objective and culturally neutral and is driven by empirical data (quantative)
degree of control
describes the conditions in and around the conditions we wish to study
non-experimental design types
direct obserbation focus group case study content analysis elite interview survey
before-and-after designs
do not use control groups, always use pretests and posttests, and use intervention analysis over time
randomness can be achieved by
ensuring that individuals have average characteristics, ensuring that groups have average characteristics, randomly assigning individuals to groups with similar conditions, or ensuring matching characteristics
independent variable
explanation (x)
factorial designs
generally use one control and several experimental groups
logic model
graphic representation of a theory of change
inductivism
holds that science requires the collection of data and testing of hypotheses that are unbiased
snowball sampling
identify a few units within a population that fit our criteria and acquire, from our initial sample, other sources to interview
grand theory
includes the big ideas that guide the types of research questions we ask
paradigms
incremental and cumulative study using common ways of thinking about problems
emic
information refers to research that is conducted and written from the perspective and cultural lens of the subject (qualitative)
exploratory research
investigates a new phenomena and contributes to the development of new theories
quota sampling
involves determining in advance which characteristics of a population we want to focus on and selecting a sample in proportion to those characteristics
theory of change
is a theoretical description of a problem, a program that will address the problem, and the expected outcomes of the program
middle-range theory
is concerned with developing explanations for specific phenomenon
rationalist justification
knowledge is more than sensory perceptions. We can "know" information that we cannot experience
multiple-pretest design
many pretests and one posttest
quasi-experimental design types
nonequivililent control group design before-and-after designs factorial designs
multiple-posttest design
one pretest and many posttests
dependent variable
phenomena (y)
research design
plan to go about collecting data
meta-theories
present a perspective combining metaphysics and epistemology and tend to guide our methodologies
empirical theory
reformulates the research question based on current knowledge from research, observation, and logic about the phenomena under investigation
two major errors in qualitative research
researcher bias reactivity
quasi-experimental designs
resemble experimental designs but fail to qualify as "pure" experiments due to some failure of the design itself
structured interviews
seek to identify numbers of responses that fall into pre-determined categories
limitations to experimental designs
selection bias attrition endogenous change history/external events contamination low external validity
experimental design
studies the effect of one specific variable in an environment that is sufficiently highly controlled as to rules out other possible explanations.
epistemology
study of knowledge
metaphysics
study of reality
axiology
study of values
researcher bias
the assumptions a researcher brings to the research process may influence the outcomes of the research
reactivity
the effect that researchers have on subjects that would not have happened if the researcher were not there
empiricist justification
the source of all knowledge comes down to immediate sensory experience.
post-normal science
the values inherent in the study of matters of public concern are evidence of an environment different from the physical world
falsification
theorized by Karl Popper and believed that no matter how much data we collect, they will not be sufficient to warrant any universal statements
grounded theory
theory that emerges from exploratory research grounded in interpretations of observations
randomized comparative change design
uses a pretest and a posttest
randomized comparative posttest design
uses only a posttest
nonequivalent control group design
utilize both a control and experimental group, assignments to each group are made on a case-by-case basis as individuals become available, or some similar characteristic of an overall group is used to select members
iterative process
we continually review and refine our work while we are working in each step and across the steps