M9 Peer Review Process

During an official course review, the Course Representative is never consulted.

False

In a QM-Managed Review, the team members make all their decisions as a group.

False

In an official QM Peer Review, all the reviewers on the peer review team can be from the same institution as the course to be reviewed.

False

Peer Reviewers should write recommendations only for Specific Review Standards that are "Not Met."

False

The Team Chair completes the Course Worksheet.

False

The active course review period is approximately five weeks.

False

The entire reviewer team re-reviews the course if it does not meet expectations upon the initial review.

False

You cannot be a Peer Reviewer if your institution does not subscribe to Quality Matters.

False

Which of the following types of review lead to QM certification if the course meets expectations? Select all that apply.

Official, QM-Managed Reviews Official, Subscriber-Managed Reviews

Which of the following statements about the composition of the QM Peer Review team is true?

The roles of the Subject Matter Expert (SME) and the External Reviewer can be filled by the same person.

In an official review, a team of three reviewers reviews the course.

True

In an official review, the Team Chair must be a Master Reviewer.

True

QM suggests reviewing "mature" courses (courses that have been offered at least two times).

True

QM's overall goal is to provide a system for the improvement of course quality.

True

Reviewers do not assign points for each of the Specific Review Standards; pre-assigned points are assigned based on "majority rules."

True

The Course Worksheet provides the review team with initial information about the course.

True