M9 Peer Review Process
During an official course review, the Course Representative is never consulted.
False
In a QM-Managed Review, the team members make all their decisions as a group.
False
In an official QM Peer Review, all the reviewers on the peer review team can be from the same institution as the course to be reviewed.
False
Peer Reviewers should write recommendations only for Specific Review Standards that are "Not Met."
False
The Team Chair completes the Course Worksheet.
False
The active course review period is approximately five weeks.
False
The entire reviewer team re-reviews the course if it does not meet expectations upon the initial review.
False
You cannot be a Peer Reviewer if your institution does not subscribe to Quality Matters.
False
Which of the following types of review lead to QM certification if the course meets expectations? Select all that apply.
Official, QM-Managed Reviews Official, Subscriber-Managed Reviews
Which of the following statements about the composition of the QM Peer Review team is true?
The roles of the Subject Matter Expert (SME) and the External Reviewer can be filled by the same person.
In an official review, a team of three reviewers reviews the course.
True
In an official review, the Team Chair must be a Master Reviewer.
True
QM suggests reviewing "mature" courses (courses that have been offered at least two times).
True
QM's overall goal is to provide a system for the improvement of course quality.
True
Reviewers do not assign points for each of the Specific Review Standards; pre-assigned points are assigned based on "majority rules."
True
The Course Worksheet provides the review team with initial information about the course.
True