Shelby County v. Holder

Lakukan tugas rumah & ujian kamu dengan baik sekarang menggunakan Quizwiz!

Judgment

5-4

Procedure

District court upheld sections 4 and 5 and sent it to the supreme court

Issues

Does the renewal of Section 5 of the Voter Rights Act under the constraints of Section 4(b) exceed Congress' authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments, and therefore violate the Tenth Amendment and Article Four of the Constitution?

Extra Notes

How acceptable does it have to be? They need a new coverage formula

Opinion

Majority Opinion: Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito Yes, Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act is unconstitutional. Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. delivered the opinion of the 5-4 majority. The Court held that Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act imposes current burdens that are no longer responsive to the current conditions in the voting districts in question. Although the constraints this section places on specific states made sense in the 1960s and 1970s, they do not any longer and now represent an unconstitutional violation of the power to regulate elections that the Constitution reserves for the states. The Court also held that the formula for determining whether changes to a state's voting procedure should be federally reviewed is now outdated and does not reflect the changes that have occurred in the last 50 years in narrowing the voting turnout gap in the states in question. Congress should rewrite a new formula. In his concurring opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas argued that Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act is unconstitutional in addition to Section 4. He wrote that the blatant discrimination against certain voters that Section 5 was intended to prohibit is no longer evident. Without such extraordinary circumstances, Congress cannot constitutionally justify placing the burden of Section 5 on the states in question. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote a dissent in which she argued that Congress' power to enforce the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments encompasses legislative action such as the Voting Rights Act. The legislative history and text of the Amendments as well as previous judicial precedent support Congress' authority to enact legislation that specifically targets potential state abuses. However, Congress does not have unlimited authority but must show that the means taken rationally advance a legitimate objective, as is the case with the Voting Rights Act. The evidence Congress gathered to determine whether to renew the Voting Rights Act sufficiently proved that there was still a current need to justify the burdens placed on the states in question. She also argued that, by holding Section 4 unconstitutional, the majority's opinion makes it impossible to effectively enforce Section 5. Justice Stephen G. Breyer, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, and Justice Elena Kagan joined in the dissent. • Court should defer to the legislature Court strikes down coverage formula in Section 4 and tells congress to fix this which they don't so states are now free to make changes without supervision? • Now what? Try a 14th amendment suit? • But sect 2 is better

Holding

Section 4(b) (coverage formula) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 is unconstitutional.

Facts

Shelby County, Alabama, filed suit in district court and sought both a declaratory judgment that Section 5 and Section 4(b) are unconstitutional and a permanent injunction against their enforcement. The district court upheld the constitutionality of the Sections and granted summary judgment for the Attorney General. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held that Congress did not exceed its powers by reauthorizing Section 5 and that Section 4(b) is still relevant to the issue of voting discrimination

Source of Law

Voting Rights Act

Section 4

which contains the coverage formula that determines which jurisdictions are subjected to preclearance based on their histories of discrimination in voting

Section 5

which requires certain states and local governments to obtain federal preclearance before implementing any changes to their voting laws or practices; and


Set pelajaran terkait

calm the mind and soothe the skin

View Set

Weekly Challenge 1 (Google Data Analytics)

View Set

Risk Management and Employee Rights

View Set

Pediatric Hesi Case Study: Dehydration

View Set

Ch. 2 Hardware - Adaptive Learning Assignment

View Set

Chapter 3 life policy provisions, riders and options

View Set