terms

What is the difference between an inductively strong argument and an inductively weak one?

An inductive argument that succeeds in providing probable-but not conclusive-logical support for its conclusion is said to be strong. An inductive argument that fails to provide such support is said to be weak.

What logical conclusion can you draw about an argument that is valid but has a false conclusion?

At least one of the premises is false

What is the term for strong arguments that have true premises?

Cogent

The terms valid and invalid apply to what types of arguments?

Deductive argument

Deductive Argument

Intended to provide conclusive support for its conclusion.

What kind of guarantee does a deductive argument provide when it is valid?

It has the kind of logical structure that guarantees the truth of the conclusion if the premises are true.

Is it possible for a valid argument to have true premises and a false conclusion?

No

Are inductive arguments truth-preserving? Why or why not?

No because as it is possible for the premises in a strong inductive argument to be true while the conclusion is false.

Can an inductive argument guarantee the truth of the conclusion if the premises are true? Why or why not?

No. An inductive argument is intended to provide only probable support for its conclusion.

What is the term for valid arguments that have true premises?

Sound

Can a valid have false premises and a false conclusion? False premises and true conclusion?

Yes;Yes

What is a deductive argument?

An argument intended to provide logically conclusive support for its conclusion.

Valid

A deductive argument that succeeds in providing conclusive support for its conclusion.

What is an inductive argument?

An argument intended to provide probable, not conclusive, support for its conclusion.

In what way are conclusions of deductive arguments absolute?

Either the conclusion is true or it is not. There is no sliding scale of truth or falsity.