C. J Chapter 5

Ace your homework & exams now with Quizwiz!

Which of the following Supreme Court cases diminish the scope of exclusionary war? A. Illinois v. Rodriguez B. Aguilar v. Texas C. Miranda v. Arizona D. Hayes v. Florida

A

In 2006 the USA PATRIOT Act was repealed.

False

A writ of certiorari A. Allows appellate courts to review the record of a lower court case B. Allows officers to search a suspects home C. Is Latin for an affidavit D. Asks the court to free somebody who has been wrongfully convicted

A

During which Supreme Court Justice's tenure did the rights of individuals expand dramatically? A. Earl Warren B. Warren Burger C. John Ashcroft D. William Rehnquist

A

In the case of U.S. v. Sokolow, the Supreme Court ruled that the legitimacy of stopping and detaining the suspect for investigative purposes when there is probable cause lacking, must be according to ________ criterion. A. Totality of circumstances B. Probable cause C. Best guess D. Certainty

A

In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court recognize the need for emergency searches without a warrant? A. Warden v. Hayden B. Maryland v. Buie D. Mincey v. Arizona D. Arkansas v. Sanders

A

In which of the following cases was it established that an officer must have an arrest warrant to enter a suspect's private residence, unless the suspect gives consent or there are some emergency circumstances? A. Payton v. New York B. Ashcraft v. Tennessee C. US v. Mendenhall D. Stansbury v. California

A

Probable cause is _____ A. A set of facts that cause a reasonable person to believe that a person committed a specific crime B. A precedent-setting term concerned with the use of undercover operations C. A police procedural issue concerned with the use of deadly force D. Illegal explanation for the use of interrogation as a means to elicit a confession

A

Silverthorne Lumber Co v. US is responsible for describing what principle of fourth amendment processes? A. Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine B. Exclusionary rule C. Public safety exception D. Good faith exception

A

The plain view doctrine was set out in ______ A. Harris v. US B. Carroll v. US C. US v. Robinson D. Terry v. Ohio

A

Which 1936 Supreme Court case addressed physical abuse as a means of obtaining a confession? A. Brown v. Mississippi B. Miranda v. Arizona C. Ashcraft v. Tennessee D. Escobedo v. Illinois

A

Which Supreme Court case has become the basis for "stop and frisk"? A. Terry v. Ohio B. Miranda v. Arizona C. Brady v. US D. Argersinger v. Hamlin

A

Which US Supreme Court case was responsible for the creation of the exclusionary rule? A. Weeks v. US B. Chimel v. California C. Powell v. Alabama D. Johnson v. Avery

A

Which case established the minimization requirement for electronic surveillance? A. US v. Scott B. Katz v. US C. Olmstead v. US D. Reno v. ACLU

A

Which of the following Supreme Court cases is concerned with search incident to lawful arrest? A. US v. Robinson B. Illinois v. Krull C. Maryland v. Garrison D. US v. Irizarry

A

Which of the following Supreme Court cases set the "free to leave" test? A. US. v. Mendenhall B. Chimel v. California C. Illinois v. Perkins D. Mapp v. Ohio

A

Which of the following is not an area of communication with which the ECPA deals specifically? A. GPS tracking B. Tracing devices that determine the number from which a call emanates C. Wiretaps and bugs D. Pen registers that record the numbers dialed from telephone

A

Which of the following requires that incriminating evidence be seized by police according to the constitutional specifications of due process or it will not be allowed as evidence in court? A. Exclusionary rule B. Due process rule C. Procedural rule D. Seizure rule

A

_____ is a belief, based on a consideration of the facts at hand and on reasonable inferences drawn from those facts that would induce an ordinarily prudent and cautious person under the same circumstances to conclude that criminal activity is taking place or that criminal activity has recently occurred A. Reasonable suspicion B. Probable cause C. Plainview D. The good faith exception

A

________ cases produce substantial changes both in the understanding of the requirements of due process and in the practical day-to-day operations of the justice system. A. Landmark B. Celebrated C. Sensational D. Crucial

A

A (n) _____ warrant is issued based on probable cause to believe that evidence of a crime, while not currently at the place described, will likely be there when the warrant is executed A. Electronic B. Anticipatory C. Latent D. Plainview

B

In 2005 ________ was appointed Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. A. Warren Burger B. John G. Roberts C. Earl Warren D. William Rehnquist

B

In which of the following cases did the US Supreme Court extend the protection against warrantless searches to overnight guests residing in the home of another? A. US v. Leon B. Minnesota v. Olson C. Brady v. US D. Miranda v. Arizona

B

The 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case U.S. v. Leon established A. Warrantless searches B. The good faith exception C. The exclusionary rule D. The plain view doctrine

B

The US Supreme Court decided in Illinois v. Perkins that A. The police must obtain a warrant to secure a wire tap B. Inmates freely talking about their crimes to an undercover officer posing as an inmate are not protected by Miranda C. Defendants have the right to an attorney at a lineup D. Spontaneous statements are protected by Miranda

B

The applicability of constitutional rights to all citizens, regardless of state law or procedure is guaranteed by the _____ amendment A. Sixth B. 14th C. Eighth D. Fourth

B

Unreasonable searches and seizures are prohibited by the _____ A. Fifth amendment B. Fourth amendment C. Protection clause D. Equality statute

B

Which Supreme Court ruling applied the principles developed in Weeks vs US to trials in state courts? A. Horton v. California B. Mapp v. Ohio C. Illinois v. Gates D. US v. Leon

B

Which US Supreme Court made the exclusionary rule applicable to criminal prosecutions at the state level? A. Eisenhower court B. Warren court C. Rehnquist court D. Burger court

B

An officer's authority to detain occupants of a dwelling incident to the execution of a valid search warrant is ________. A. Limited by the sixth amendment B. Limited to a pat down C. Absolute and unqualified D. As broad as the warrant allows

C

Illegal principle that excludes from introduction at trial any evidence later developed as a result of an illegal search or seizure is called A. Compelling interest B. Latent evidence C. Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine D. Good-faith exception

C

In California v. Carney (1985), the Court extended police authority to conduct warrentless searches of vehicles to include A. Motorcycles B. Bicycles C. Motor homes D. Airplans

C

In Wells, the Court held that ____ authorizing the search of a vehicle for inventorying purposes were necessary before such a discovery could be legitimate A. Comprehensive criteria B. Fair yardsticks C. Reasonable parameters D. Standardized criteria

C

In which of the following cases did the US Supreme Court rule that the suspect of a robbery cannot be ordered to undergo surgery because such a magnitude of intrusion into his body was unacceptable under the right to privacy guaranteed by the fourth amendment? A. Olmstead v. US B. US v. Montoya de Hernadez C. Winston v. Lee D. Hayes v. Florida

C

Jake and Mary are married and own their home. The police come to the house and ask for permission to search the house for drugs. Jake gives his consent to the search, but Mary says no because she has hidden some drugs in the kitchen. The police come in and search, over Mary's objection, since Jake said it was OK. They find Mary's drugs. Which of the following is legally correct in the ensuing trial? A. The drugs cannot be used at Mary's trial because the police violated the plain view doctrine B. The drugs can be used at Mary's trial because the exclusionary rule does not apply in drug cases C. The drug cannot be used in Mary's trial because she did not consent to the search D. The drugs can be used at Mary's trial because the police had Jake's consent to search the house

C

To elicit a confession, police departments cannot hire professionals skilled in the art of psychological manipulation because of the decision in the case of A. Arizona v. Fulminate B. Miranda v. Arizona C. Leyra v. Denno D. Escobedo v. Illinois

C

What legal concept provides the basis of suspicion less searches when Public Safety is at issue? A. Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine B. Reasonable suspicion C. Compelling interest D. Probable cause

C

Which US Supreme Court case made the exclusionary rule applicable to seizures by federal officers? A. Powell v. Arizona B. Chimel c. California C. Weeks v. US D. Johnson v. Avery

C

Which famous 1966 US Supreme Court case provided for the advisement of rights to criminal suspects prior to questioning? A. Mapp v. Ohio B. Tennessee v. Garner C. Miranda v. Arizona D. Chimel v. California

C

An officer knocks on the door of a suspected drug dealer, who invites the officer into the house. While in the kitchen, the officer notices a marijuana plant on the windowsill. The officer may legally seize the plant under the _____ doctrine A. Emergency search of property B. Good-faith C. Emergency search of a person D. Plain view

D

In ______, the US Supreme Court stated that considerations of public safety can be overiding and negate the need for rights advisement prior to limited questioning A. Terry v. Ohio B. Mapp v. Ohio C. Miranda v. Arizona D. New York v. Quarles

D

Police officers are not allowed to randomly stop citizens for questioning when they don't suspect them of breaking the law. This rule was established in A. Horton v. California B. Arizona v. Hicks C. US v. Irizarry D. Brown v. Texas

D

What two principles are considered the Miranda triggers? A. Arrest and waiver B. Stop and frisk C. Arrest and interrogation D. Custody and interrogation

D

Which 1987 Supreme Court case supported the use of evidence obtained with a search warrant that was inaccurate in its specifics? A. Chimel v. California B. Miranda v. Arizona C. Aguilar v. Texas D. Maryland v. Garrison

D

Which amendment guarantees against self-incrimination? A. 14th amendment B. Fourth amendment C. Eighth amendment D. Fifth amendment

D

Which of the following Supreme Court cases determined that "inadvertence" is no longer a necessary condition to ensure the legitimacy of seizure under the Plainview doctrine? A. Maryland v. Garrison B. Chimel v. California C. Illinois v. Krull D. Horton v. California

D

Which of the following US Supreme Court cases held that electronic eavesdropping was a search and seizure under the Fourth amendment? A. Schmerber v. California B. Olmstead v. US C. Lee v. Florida D. Katz v. US

D

Which of the following cases emphasizes the totality of circumstances approach? A. Brown v. Mississippi B. US v. Leon C. Mapp v. Ohio D. Illinois v. Gates

D

Which of the following is not a justification for emergency warrantless searches? A. Danger to life B. Danger of escape C. Danger of the removal or destruction of evidence D. Danger to property

D

Which of the following is not one of the major areas of due process requirements of relevance to the police? A. Evidence and investigation B. Interrogation C. Arrest D. Incarceration

D

______ holds that evidence of an offense that is collected or obtained by law enforcement officers in violation of a defendant's constitutional rights is inadmissible for use in a criminal prosecution in a court of law A. Probable cause B. Plain view C. Inherently coercive D. Exclusionary rule

D

According to the verdict in U.S. v. Irizarry, the plain-view doctrine applies if officers move objects so they can see evidence otherwise hidden from view

False

Evidence seized by police officers who are proceeding on a warrant but violate the knock-and-announce rule will be subject to the exclusionary rule

False

Police officers may enter a home to conduct a warrantless search even if one of the residents does not give permission

False

Supreme court rulings prohibit officers from searching arrestees of the opposite sex

False

The sole condition for an emergency warrantless search is a probable cause to believe that there is an emergency threat of destruction of evidence.

False

A "knowing waiver" of rights requires that the defendant be able to understand the consequences of not invoking the Miranda rights

True

Harris v. U.S. sets out the plain-view doctrine.

True

In California v. Hodari D., the court ruled that suspects who flee from officers and throw away evidence as they retreat may be arrested based on the nature of the abandoned evidence

True

In Illinois v. Caballes, the US Supreme Court has held that the use of a drug-sniffing dog during a routine and lawful traffic stop is permissible and may not even be a search within the meaning of the fourth amendment

True

In Richards v. Wisconsin, the Supreme Court favored "no knock" entry when the police have a reasonable suspicion that knocking and announcing their presence would be dangerous or futile

True

In technical terms, an arrest occurs whenever a law-enforcement officer restricts a person's freedom to leave

True

In the 1960s, the US Supreme Court accelerated the process of guaranteeing individual rights in the face of criminal prosecution

True

Officers are usually required to submit an affidavit demonstrating probable cause to a magistrate or prosecutor in order to obtain an arrest warrant

True

Officers need to provide Miranda warnings only in situations involving both arrest and custodial interrogation

True

Probable cause is the minimum standard necessary for an arrest under any circumstance

True

Rights are concerned with procedure, that is, with how police and other actors in the criminal justice system handle each part of the process of dealing with suspects.

True

The U.S. Supreme Court established the public safety exception to the Miranda rule in New York v. Quarles

True

The court recognized a suspect's right to have legal counsel present during interrogation in Escobedo v. Illinois.

True

Warrantless searches of a vehicle are permitted if officers have probable cause to believe contraband is present

True

When using phone taps, police must stop monitoring the call when it becomes obvious the conversation is innocent

True


Related study sets

Starting Out with Python, 3e Ch 4

View Set

Audit Chapter 5 Risk Assessment: Internal Control Evaluation

View Set

Biology Exam 2 - Mastering Bio HW

View Set

Ch. 14 Express & Implied Warranties

View Set

L3 Soil components and soil formation

View Set

Cardiovascular Priority Questions

View Set

A&P- The Nervous System mastering questions

View Set