Management Chapter 6
firm-level strategy
corporate strategy that addresses question "how should we compete against a particular firm?"
core capabilities
internal decision making routines, problem solving processes, & organizational cultures that determine how efficiently inputs can be turned into outputs -intangible
dogs
low share, low growth; often unprofitable and should be sold or closed down/liquidated
corporate-level strategy
overall organizational strategy that answers question "what business(es) are we in or should we be in? -2 approaches: portfolio & grand strategy
BCG matrix
portfolio strategy developed by the BCG that categorizes a corporation's businesses by growth rate and relative market share and helps managers decide how to invest corporate funds
focus strategy
posit. strategy of using cost leadership or differentiatio to produce a specialized product or service for a limited, specially targeted group of customers in partic geographic region/market segment -work in market niches (ex: Axe body spray)
nonsubstitutable resource
resource that produces value or competitive advantage and has no equivalent substitutes or replacements -ex: iTunes
strategic reference points
strategic targets managers use to measure whether a firm has developed the core competencies it needs to achieve a sustainable competitive advantage -choice to seek or avoid risk depend on whether top mgmt views company as falling above or below these strategic reference points -ex: competitor's prices -when company is performing above, IRONICALLY: risk-averse (conservative, defensive) -when company is performing below, risk-taking (daring, offensive, nothing to lose)
distinctive competence
what a company can make, do, or perform better than its competitors -ex: quality & reliability -tangible (faster, cheaper, better) -cannot be sustained for long without superior core capabilities
shadow-strategy task force
a committee within a company that analyzes the company's own weaknesses to determine how competitors could exploit them for competitive advantage
industry-level strategy
a corporate strategy that addresses the question "how should we compete in this industry?"
strategic dissonance
a discrepancy between a company's intended strategy & the strategic actions managers take when implementing the strategy
resources
assets, capabilities, processes, employee time, info and knowledge that org uses to improve effectiveness & efficiency and create & sustain competitive advantage
imperfectly imitable resource
resource that's impossible or extremely costly/difficult for other firms to duplicate -ex: Apple app store's closed platform
rare resource
resource that's not controlled or possessed by many competing firms -ex: Apple operating system
strategic group
group of companies within an industry against which top managers compare, evaluate, and benchmark strategic threats & opportunities -direct competitors or companies w/ similar strategy
stars
high growth, high share; needs substantial investment but produces sizable profits
cash cows
high share, low growth; highly profitable
benchmarking
identifying outstanding practices, processes, and standards at other companies and adapting them to your own company
Step 1 (assess need for strategic change)
-avoid competitive inertia -look for strategic dissonance
corporate-level vs industry-level vs firm-level strategies
-corporate level: what business to be in -industry level: how to compete within an industry -firm level: when, where, & what strategic actions should be taken against a direct competitor
drawbacks of portfolio strategy
-evidence suggests that acquiring unrelated businesses is not useful and actually riskier than single, undiversified businesses -dysfunctional consequences when companies are categorized as stars, cash cows, dogs, question marks--> BCG often yields incorrect judgement about companies' potential bc relies on past performance (poor indicator of future performance) -using BCG can weaken the strongest performer of portfolio: cash cows -labeling top performer as cash cow can harm eployee morale
portfolio strategy theories
-more businesses in which corporation competes, smaller its overall chances of failing -companies can reduce risk even more through unrelated diversification -acquiring new businesses is preferred method of unrelated diversification -investing profits/CF from mature, slow-growth businesses into newer, faster-growing businesses can reduce long-term risk
positioning vs. adaptive strategies
-positioning: aims to minimize effects of industry competition and build sustainable competitive advantage -adaptive: aims to choose industry-level strategy that's best suited to changes in the organization's external environment
3 steps of strategy making process
1. assess need for strategic change 2. conduct situational analysis 3. choose strategic alternatives
3 basic questions to formulate effective strategies
1. what business are we in? 2. how should we compete in this industry? 3. who are our competitors, and how should we respond to them?
competitive inertia
a reluctance to change strategies or competitive practices that have been successful in the past -ex: Sony-too many products in too many divisions, too many people, extreme costs
situational (SWOT) analysis
assessment of S&W in an organization's internal environment and the opportunities & threats in its external environment -begins w/ assessment of distinctive competencies & core capabilities
grand strategy
broad strategic plan to help an org acheive its strategic goals and guide the strategic alternatives that managers of individual businesses/subunits may use -3 kinds: growth, stability, and retrenchment/recovery
core firms
central companies in a strategic group -ex: Lowe's = core firm in Home Depot's strategic group
Porter's 5 industry forces that determine levels of competition in an industry (potential for long-term profitability)
character of rivalry, threat of new entrants, threat of substitute products/services, bargaining power of suppliers, bargaining power of buyers -stronger forces = less attractive to investors bc harder to be profitable
reactors
companies that don't follow a consistent adaptive strategy but instead react to changes in the external environment after they occur -poorest performers of the 4, approach = inherently unstable
defenders
companies using adaptive strategy aimed at defending strategic positions by seeking moderate, steady growth and offering a limited range of high-quality products/services to a well-defined set of customers
prospectors
companies using adaptive strategy that seeks fast growth by searching for new market opportunities, encouraging risk taking, and being the 1st to bring innovative new products to market -like gold miners who prospect for gold nuggets (new products) in hope that nuggets will lead them to rich deposit of gold (fast growth)
analyzers
companies using adaptive strategy that seeks to minimize risks and maximize profits by following/imitating proven successes of prospectors -blend of defender & prospector -seek moderate, steady growth and limited opportunities for fast growth -ex: Redbox/Netflix
sustainable competitive advantage
competitive advantage that other companies have tried unsuccessfully to duplicate and have, for the moment, stopped trying to duplicate -goal of most organizational strategies
response
competitive countermove, prompted by rival's attack, to defend or improve a company's market share or profit -2 kinds of responses: mirror/match competitor's move or respond along a different dimension than competitor -ex: B&N lowered price of Nook Simple Touch vs. Kindle letting customers get rid of ads for a fee -large market commonality (overlap): less motivation to attack, more likely to respond to attack bc a lot is at stake -resource similarity affects response capability (how quickly/forcefully a company can respond to an attack) -strong resource similarity-> match strategic moves (firm is less likely to attack firms w similar levels of resources bc unlikely to gain advantage if firm strikes back)
attack
competitive move designed to reduce a rival's market share or profits -ex: Amazon introduced Special Offers Kindle priced lower than any of B&N's nooks -if 1 firm is substantially stronger than another, attack is more likely to produce sustained advtg -more moves a company initiates against competitors, and greater the tendency to respond, better the performance
portfolio strategy
corporate-level strategy that minimizes risk by diversifying investment among various businesses or product lines -acquire (acquisitions-preferred method-or develop internally) companies that fit well w/ rest of portfolio, sell those that don't
Porter's 3 positioning strategies
cost leadership, differentiation, focus
unrelated diversification
creating or acquiring companies in completely unrelated businesses -way for company to reduce risk even more than acquisitions
related diversification
creating or acquiring companies that share similar products, manufacturing, marketing, tech, or cultures -contrary to predictions of portfolio strategy, this is prob best approach of helping managers decide what companies to buy/sell -key: create/buy companies with similar core capabilities
4 kinds of adaptive strategies
defenders, prospectors, analyzers, reactors
market commonality
degree to which 2 companies have overlapping products, services, or customers in multiple markets -more markets in which there is overlap, more intense the direct competition
resource similarity
extent to which a competitor has similar amounts and kinds of resources (assets, capabilities, processes, info used to create/sustain a competitive advantage)
secondary firms
firms in a strategic group that follow strategies related to but somewhat different from those of the core firms -ex: 84 lumber = secondary firm for Home Depot (caters to supplying professional contractors, doesn't have assistance available to average consumer)
question marks
low share, high growth; good potential-may become stars but investing in these is riskier
strategic reference point theory
managers choose between 2 basic alternative strategies: 1. conservative, risk-avoiding strategy (aims to protect an existing competitive advantage) 2. aggressive, risk-seeking strategy (aims to extend or create a sustainable competitive advantage)
2 factors that determine extent to which firms will be in direct competition with each other
market commonality, resource similarity
bargaining power of buyers
measure of influence customers have on firm's prices -if company sells popular product/service to multiple buyers, has more power to set prices -if comp is dependent on a few high-volume buyers, buyers have bargaining power to dictate prices
character of the rivalry
measure of intensity of competitive behavior between companies in an industry -more cutthroat rivalry, less attractiveness & profitability
threat of new entrants
measure of the degree to which barriers of entry make it easy or difficult for new companies to get started in an industry -easy entrance, more competition, lower prices and profits -barriers: large capital requirements, need for specialized knowledge
threat of substitute products/services
measure of the ease with which customers can find substitutes for an industry's products or services -if customers can easily find substitutes, higher competition, lower profits
bargaining power of suppliers
measure of the influence that suppliers of parts, materials, and services to firms in an industry have on the prices of these inputs -if there are few suppliers or company is dependent on 1 supplier with specialized skills/knowledge, supplier has bargaining power to dictate price levels -ex: oil industry
cost leadership
positioning strategy of producing a product/service of acceptable quality at consistently lower production costs than competitor can, so the firm can offer the product/service at the lowest price in the industry -protects companies by deterring new entrants (have to match prices), forces down prices of substitute products/services, attracts bargain-seeking buyers, increases bargaining power w suppliers
differentiation
positioning strategy of providing a product/service that is sufficiently different from competitors offerings that customers are wiling to pay a premium price for it -reduces threat of substitute products, makes it easier to retain customers and harder for new entrants trying to attract new customers
competitive advantage
providing greater value for customers than competitors can -ex: iPad's sleek design & Apple's company reputation for easy to use, innovative products (iphone/ipod)
valuable resource
resource that allows companies to improve efficiency & effectiveness -value affected by change in customer demand/preferences, competitor's actions, & technology -ex: iPad's touch screen, large app selection, intuitive operating system
direct competition
rivalry between 2 companies that offer similar services/products, acknowledge each other as rivals, and act/react to each other's strategic actions -most companies in an industry do not directly compete with each other (McDonalds/Red Lobster, for ex.) -2 strategic moves firms can make: attack/response
diversification
strategy for reducing risk by buying a variety of items (stocks or types of businesses) so that the failure of 1 stock/business doesn't doom the entire portfolio
stability strategy
strategy that focuses on improving the way in which the company sells the same products or services to the same customers -companies use this when external environment doesn't change much or after they've struggled w periods of explosive growth
growth strategy
strategy that focuses on increasing profits revenues, market share, or the # of places in which the company does business -ways to grow: 1. externally: merging with/acquiring companies in same or different businesses 2. internally: directly expanding comp's existing business or creating and growing new businesses
retrenchment strategy
strategy that focuses on turning around very poor company performance by shrinking the size or scope of business -steps: 1. cost reductions (fire employees, close poorly performing stores, close entire lines of products) 2. recovery: strategic actions taken after retrenchment to return to a growth strategy
4 conditions for resources to be used to achieve sustainable competitive advantage
valuable, rare, imperfectly imitable, nonsubstitutable