consumer behavior exam 2
what are weathermen less overconfident and better calibrated than doctors
weather men repeat the same risk analysis day after day, get instant feedback, and learn by doing feedback for doctors is not always well defined and sometimes diagnoses remain uncertain
4 ways marketers take advantage of the fact that people tend to be overconfident
weight loss programs gym memberships credit card interest rates putting greens in gold stores
under what conditions is the foot in the door technique the most effective?
when the initial commitments are: - active - public - effortful - internally motivated
what factors contribute to overconfidence
wishful thinking confirmation bias hindsight bias self serving bias
right and wrong way to leverage descriptive norms
you shouldn't emphasize that most people are doing the wrong thing because that makes it seem less wrong and like less of a big deal that it is
2 biases that result from reliance on the availability heuristic
overclaiming ease of recall bias
unity principle
people are more likely to be persuaded by people with whom they share an identity use specific/unique jargon, convey exclusivity, define the out group, invoke family ties
adjustment
people basing their judgements on an initial value (anchor) and adjusting accordingly BUT it's often insufficient, irrelevant, and can happen for many types of estimates
conflicts of interest
people believing their own connections to an issue are enlightening and others' are "biasing"
3 examples of the power of thin slice judgments
people can tell when people are lying based on facial movements honesty, deception, emotions, relationship success, personality, voting behavior, etc.
prospect theory
people choose to take on risk when evaluating potential losses and avoid risks when evaluating potential gains
overclaiming
people claim more responsibility for collective endeavors than is logically possible
diffusion of responsibility
people fail to take responsibility for action or inaction because of the presence of other people sharing the responsibility
insensitivity to sample size
people judge samples as having similar properties to their population and do not take into consideration sample size paying attention to the quality and nUMBER of reviews
bias blind spot
people tend to believe that their own judgments are less prone to bias than others
How to avoid diffusion of responsibility
single out someone and tell them what to do
Internally derived reference point
"fair" price, price often / most often charged, last price you paid, price of brand usually bought
descriptive norms
"how things are" -> what most people in a group think, feel, or do "this is how much energy most people are using" "billions and billions served at McDonalds"
injunctive norms
"how things should be" -> how people should act, feel, and think in a given situation, irrespective of how people typically respond in the setting and people who violate these standards are often judged negatively "eat healthy. get active. make a difference!" = the socially appropriate thing to do is the eat healthy and stay active
externally derived reference point
"regular retail price", what it's placed near, how other items in the line are priced ex: it's hot and you're at the beach. you want a refreshment. how much would you pay for ice cream? pay more for 7 oz in a 5 oz cup compared to 8 oz in a 10 oz cup
system 2 processing
- "reflective" - controlled - effortful - slow and often serial - may be abstract - rule-based
outside view
- considering others' failures - considering their own past failures - other students were better at predicting students' completion times
thin slice judgments
People can make surprisingly accurate judgments quickly and automatically
what is construal
The way in which a person interprets the world around them
what's a central cue
argument strength
what are 3 factors of attitudes formed via the peripheral route?
- central cues (argument strength) - peripheral cues (source factors like likability, attractiveness, status, expertise, etc.) - message factors - # of arguments, length of argument, etc.
3 tactics that marketers can do to leverage the insight that consumers are loss averse
- discounts vs. surcharge framing (10 cent a gallon cash discount, 10 cent a gallon credit surcharge) - save more tomorrow - opt in vs opt out framing
inside view
- focus on plans and intentions and construct a (best-case) scenario in which the task gets done - the imagined scenario is typically optimistic because it sets goals for the participants in the activity - leads to more optimistic predictions
system 1 processing
- intuitive - automative - effortless - rapid and parallel - concrete - associative
what are 3 factors of attitudes formed via the central route?
- persist longer - are more resistent to new persuasion - are more predictive of behavior
3 things that influence ability
- personal expertise - distraction/multi-tasking -message comprehensibility/complex
3 things that influence motivation
- personal involvement/relevance - responsibility/accountability - need for cognition
4 insights of the prospect theory that offer insights to how we construe the world
- we evaluate prospects as changes relative to a reference point - we are less sensitive to each additional unit of change - we are risk averse when choosing among gains, and risk seeking when choosing among losses - we are more sensitive to losses than we are to gains
5 factors that increase likeability
1. physical attractiveness 2. similarity 3. compliments 4. contact and cooperation 5. conditioning and association
2 days marketers can help consumers be better calibrated
1. provide clear, frequent, immediate feedback 2. encourage consumers to construe situations in multiple ways
3 factors that increase conformity
1. the unamity of the majority 2. the public nature of the judgements 3. the size of the group (the bigger the group, the more likely you will conform with them)
representativeness heuristic
making predictions by assuming that a specific instance will be prototypical of and/or similar in essential characteristics to the general category to decide if someone is a lawyer, i compare that person's characteristics to the characteristics of a typical lawyer
what is an attitude
A favorable or unfavorable evaluative reaction to something exhibited in one's beliefs, feelings, or intended behavior
Are we more or less likely to fall prey to the planning fallacy when we are making predictions about our own behavior or others' behavior? Why?
more
Is making a detailed plan likely to make you more or less susceptible to the planning fallacy? Why?
more
what two factors determine whether consumers process persuasive messages via the central or peripheral route?
motivation and ability
3 cues that signal authority
titles clothing trappings
what is more likely to have an influence in terms of the affect heuristic
vivid, relatable examples instead of cold, hard, statistics
likeability principle
we are more likely to say yes to someone we know and like
loss aversion
we are more sensitive to losses than we are to gains
how can marketers increase availability
Marketers can make recall feel easier and thus increase availability via... - Personal experience - Vividness - Recency
introspection illusion
we treat conscious introspections as a sovereign source of evidence in making self assessments and give less consideration to our behavior we do the opposite when assessing other people by placing less diagnostic weight on others' introspection and more weight on their behavior
what are the key features of the ELM model?
ELM makes predictions about how persuasive communication, and whether we take the central or peripheral route which route we take depends on our ability and motivation
What are two ways that marketers can help consumers avoid the planning fallacy?
Encourage consumers to take an outside view - Focus on other peoples' experiences AND why we might have similar experiences Focus on relevant past experiences AND why this might turn out like before Consult an unbiased outside observer (Observers naturally tend to take an outside view)
how can marketers use gain/loss framing to leverage the insight that consumers are risk averse when choosing among gains, and risk seeking when choosing among losses?
Gain Frame Program A: Preferred!- 200 customers will be saved Program B:There is a 1/3 probability that 600 customers will be saved, and 2/3 probability that no customers will be saved Loss Frame Program C: 400 customers will be injured Program D: Preferred! There is a 1/3 probability that no customers will be injured and 2/3 probability that 600 customers will be injured
boston surcharge example
In Boston, you must pay a surcharge for bags. Other places will offer a discount if you bring your own bag. Charging the surcharge is more effective at getting people to bring their own bags because of the fine. If people miss out on the discount, it is more acceptable than paying a fine.
social proof principle
One important means that people use to decide what to believe or how to act in a situation is to look at what other people are believing or doing there
authority principle
People often defer to authorities in a relatively automatic fashion, and there is a tendency to do so in response to the mere symbols of authority rather than to its substance
Reject-then-retreat (door in the face)
Start with a big request, then bring it down (increases yes's by 40%)
Milgram experiment on obedience
Studied authority Used fake electric shock to simulate a person in distress and ultimately dying
affect heuristic
The tendency to consult one's emotions instead of estimating probabilities objectively.
risk aversion
The tendency to prefer a sure gain of a moderate amount over a riskier outcome, even if the riskier outcome might have a higher expected payoff.
power of first impressions
Todorov's face judgment study people were shown pictures of candidates for congress and predicted the winners based on who looked more competent
availability heuristic
making a decision based on the answer that most easily comes to mind
heuristic
a mental shortcut used in judgment and decision making can lead to faulty beliefs and subotpimal decisions
aggregated losses
adding shipping into the cost of an order, including dessert or beverages with a meal, one price for an entire set
3 common marketing tactics that take advantage of reference dependence
advertising sale items and raising the price on non sale items multi unit pricing (4 for $2) quantity limits (limit 12 per customer)
foot in the door technique
asking for a small commitment and, after gaining compliance, asking for a bigger commitment
scarcity principle
asserts that opportunities seem more valuable when their availability is limited
what point does conformity level off
at numbers beyond 4
scope insensitivity
cognitive bias that occurs when the valuation of a problem is not valued with a multiplicative relationship to its size
what is framing
describing the same options in different ways can lead to different preferences and choices the way in which we construe that information is what differs
what point does the "bat and ball" problem illustrate
dual process theory illustrates the power of system 1 to throw an answer into our heads without recruiting system 2 to think about things more deeply
pluralistic ignorance
error of assuming that no one in a group perceives things as we do
Asch Experiment
experimented how people would rather conform than state their own individual answer even though they know the group's answer is wrong
what's a peripheral cue
factor that's external to the merits of an argument and can be used to provide a low-effort basis for determining whether an attitude object should be positively or negatively evaluated
best feedback to combat overconfidence
feedback that is: unambiguous frequent immediate
loss and gain framing example
forgoing a possible gain doesn't feel as bad as incurring a fine having to pay a surcharge feels worse than forgoing a possible gain or bonus people are more upset when it's framed as a loss than a gain
how to dispel pluralistic ignorance
hold a peer session about pluralistic ignorance
why does the reject then retreat technique / door in the face technique work?
if people see the second request as a concession, they feel inclined to respond with a concession of their own the second request appears even smaller in comparison to the larger request, and we now have 2 chances of being sucessful
normative reasons for conforming
in the service of avoiding the disapproval, scorn, or ostracism that accompanies norm violations people don't want to be labeled as jerks of weirdos
informational reasons for conforming
in the service of learning what is right or appropriate in a situation sometimes people don't know what to do
2 biases that result. from reliance on a representativeness heuristic
insensitivity to sample size regressive fallacy
seggregate gains
itemize all the things you get in a package present as a list of individual items
how can marketers leverage diminishing marginal utility
losses are more acceptable when integrated and gains are more valued when segregated
consistency principle
once we make a choice or take a stand, we feel pressured to behave consistently with that commitment
not framing example
our new fan uses 50% less energy than our old fan vs. our new fan uses twice as much energy as our old fan
framing example
our new fan uses 50% less energy than our old fan vs. our old fan uses twice as much energy as our new fan
regressive fallacy
people make predictions that expect exceptional results to continue as if the correlation between past performance and future performance was perfect, failing to account for natural fluctuations
ease of recall bias
people tend to overweigh the importance of recent events and their vividness in our memory
how does opt in vs opt out framing impact people's choices
people tend to retain the default or status quo, because the disadvantages of leaving it loom larger than advantages
overconfidence
people's subjective confidence in their judgments is reliably greater than their objective accuracy if people were perfectly calibrated, their 90% confidence intervals would include the correct answer 90% of the time
2 reasons why scarcity works
rareness signals value reactance --> people desire things they're told they cannot have
what are three aspects of the reciprocity principle that make it so influential
reciprocity is powerful, often more than other factors applies even to uninvited first favors can spur unequal exchanges
What are Cialdini's 6 principles of persuasion?
reciprocity, consistency, social proof, authority, liking, scarcity
peripheral route
requires little thought and relies on judgmental heuristics focuses on anything but the argument strength such as context, how attractive the arguer is, whether they like the expert or not, etc.
2 ways in which framing choices as gains vs. losses affects our judgments and decision
risk aversion for gain VS. risk seeking for losses
reference point
standard comparison against which an observed price is compared
central route
strength of arguments determine the persuasive outcome what's the quality of the argument, etc.
planning fallacy
tendency for people to overestimate their rate of work or underestimate how long it'll take for them to get things done
identificable victim effect
tendency to offer greater assistance to an identifiable victim as opposed to a larger, unnamed statistical group of people
third person effect
tendency to think we are less influenced than others by ads and other persuasive messages
differences of opinion
the greater the difference in opinion, the more people believe their own opinions are valid, and others' opinions are "biased"
what is the reciprocity principle
the rule that one should pay back in kind what one receives from others
anchoring
the tendency, in making judgements, to rely on the first piece of information encountered or information that comes most quickly to mind