Contract Law Ch 10

a breach by anticipatory repudiation does not require the on breaching party to reduce the damages that would be recoverable in a breach of contract action

FALSE

a unilateral contract can be breached by either the offeror or the offeree

FALSE

after a breach by anticipatory repudiation, the nonbreaching party may cease any present and future performance but must wait until the time for performance to come and go before seeking a remedy for breach

FALSE

the party who breaches a contract is always the offeror

FALSE

a bilateral contract can be breached by either the offeror or the offeree

TRUE

a breach by anticipatory repudiation is also called an anticipatory breach

TRUE

a contract may be breached in one of two ways - a breach by anticipatory repudiation or a breach by nonperformance

TRUE

article 2 of the UCC has three section that deal exclusively with breach of anticipatory repudiation

TRUE

in an employment contract for a specified term of employment, the employee is selling a specific period of time so when the employer breaches by anticipatory repudiation, the employee must make an effort to use this time to mitigate damages

TRUE

some courts do not apply the doctrine of breach by anticipatory repudiation to contract where all the remains is the payment of money

TRUE

the doctrine of breach by anticipatory repudiation presents nonbreaching parties with the opportunity to cease relying on future performances that will never occur and instead mitigate the damages recoverable in a breach of contract action

TRUE

the party who breaches a contract is always the promisor

TRUE